Caries management through the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach and glass-ionomers: Update 2013

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 5-8

  Frencken, Jo E ^a   Holmgren, Christopher J ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Aide Odontologique Internationale   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER;

ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY;

DENTAL ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS;

EID: 84891318849     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242013000600001     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent. 1996:56(3 Spec No):135-140;discussion 161-3.
2. Leal SC, Abreu DM, Frencken JE. Dental anxiety and pain related to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17 Suppl:84-8.Review.
3. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81.
4. van't Hof MA, Frencken JE, van Palenstein Helderman WH, Holmgren CJ. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for managing dental caries: a meta-analysis. Int Dent J. 2006 Dec;56(6):345-51.
5. de Amorim RG, Leal SC, Frencken JE. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a metaanalysis. Clin Oral Invest. 2012 Apr;16(2):429-41.
6. Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries preventive effect of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants over time: A systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;34(6):403-9. Review.
7. Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S, Bezerra AC, Leal SC. Cariespreventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent teeth: a meta analysis. J Oral Sci. 2009 Sep;51(3):373-82. Review.
8. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent teeth: An update of systematic review evidence. BMC Res Notes. 2011 Jan 28;4:22.
9. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M, et al. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;3:CD001830.
10. Frencken JE, Wolke J. Clinical and SEM assessment of ART high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants after 8-13 years in 4 teeth. J Dent. 2010 Jan;38(1):59-64.
11. Papacchini F, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. J Dent. 2005 Jul;33(6):459-67.
12. Frencken JE, Peters MC, Manton DJ, Leal SC, Gordan VV, Eden E. Minimal Intervention Dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FDI task group. Int Dent J. 2012 Oct;62(5):223-43.
13. Frencken JE, Leal SC. The correct use of the ART approach. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Jan-Feb;18(1):1-4. Review.
14. Fábian Molina G, Cabral RJ, Mazzola I, Brain Lascano L, Frencken JE. Biaxial Flexural Strength of high-viscosity glassionomer cements heat-cured with an LED lamp during setting. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 838460. DOI:10.1155/2013/838460. Epub 2013 Jun12.
15. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Jun;14(3):233-0.
16. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Failure rate of atraumatic restorative treatment using high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement compared to that of conventional amalgam restorative treatment in primary and permanent teeth: a systematic review update. J Minim Interv Dent. 2012;5:63-124. Erratum in: J Minin Interv Dent. 2012:5:209-10.
17. Raggio DP, Hesse D, Lenzi TL, A B Guglielmi C, Braga MM. Is atraumatic restorative treatment an option for restoring occlusoproximal caries lesions in primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012; Nov 28. DOI: 10.1111/. /ipd.12013. Epub ahead of print.
18. Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ. Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2004 Feb;83(2):120-3.
19. Lo ECM, Holmgren CJ, Hu D, Wan H, van Palenstein Helderman W. Six-year follow-up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in Chinese school children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;35(5):387-92.
20. Zanata RL, Fagundes TC, Freitas MC, Lauris JR, Navarro MF. Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):265-71.
21. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, Van't Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition - results after 3 years. Caries Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;36(6):437-44.
22. Farag A, van der Sanden WJM, Abdelwahab H, Mulder J, Frencken JE. 5-Year survival of ART restorations with and without cavity disinfection. J Dent. 2009 Jun;37(6):468-74.
23. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence. BMC Res Notes. 2011 mar 11;4:58. DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-4-58.
24. Massara MLA, Rédua PCB. Manual de referência para procedimentos clínicos em Odontopediatria. 2nd ed. São Paulo. Editora Santos; 2013. In: Massara MLA, Wambier DS, Raggio DP, Imparato JC. Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático; p. 144-5.