Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: A systematic review

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 233-240

  Mickenautsch, Steffen ^a   Yengopal, Veerasamy ^a   Banerjee, Avijit ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Atraumatic restorative treatment; Glass ionomer cement; Longevity; Meta analysis; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY;

ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; TIME;

DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 77952428590     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0335-8     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P (1996) Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent 56: 135-140.
2. Burke FJ, McHugh S, Shaw L, Hosey MT, Macpherson L, Delargy S, Dopheide B (2005) UK dentists' attitudes and behaviour towards atraumatic restorative treatment for primary teeth. Br Dent J 199: 365-369.
3. Czarnecka B (2006) The use of ART technique in modern dental practice: a personal view. J Dent 34: 620.
4. Honkala E, Behbehani J, Ibricevic H, Kerosuo E, Al-Jame G (2003) The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach to restoring primary teeth in a standard dental clinic. Int J Paediat Dent 13: 172-179.
5. Seale NS, Casamassimo PS (2003) Access to dental care for children in the United States. A survey of general practitioners. J Am Dent Assoc 134: 1630-1640.
6. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ (2000) Minimal intervention dentistry-a review. FDI commission project 1-97. Int Dent J 50: 1-12.
7. Ziraps A, Honkala E (2002) Clinical trial of a new glass ionomer for an atraumatic restorative treatment technique in class I restorations placed in Latvian school children. Med Princ Pract 11: 44-47.
8. van't Hof M, Frencken JE, van Palenstein Helderman WH, Holmgren CJ (2006) The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for managing dental caries: a meta-analysis. Int Dent J 56: 345-351.
9. Ericson D, Kidd EAM, McComb D, Mjor I, Noack MJ (2003) Minimally invasive dentistry-concept and techniques in cariology. Oral Health Prev Dent 1: 59-72.
10. Yoshida Y, van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K (2000) Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 79: 709-771.
11. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Leal SC, Oliveira LB, Bezerra AC, Bönecker M (2009) Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: a meta- analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent 10: 41-46.
12. Fuks AB (2002) The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 24: 448-455.
13. Mackert JR Jr (2004) Wahl MJ (2004) Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam? J Calif Dent Assoc 32: 601-610.
14. Frencken JE, Hof MA van 't, van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ (2004) Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 83: 120-123.
15. Sutherland SE (2001) Evidence-based dentistry: part V. Critical appraisal of the dental literature: papers about therapy. J Can Dent Assoc 67: 442-445.
16. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Worthington H, Mäkelä M (2004) Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3: CD001830. doi: 10. 1002/14651858. CD001830. pub2.
17. The Cochrane Collaboration (2006) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4. 2. 6. The Cochrane Collaboration pp 79-89.
18. The Cochrane Collaboration (2006) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4. 2. 6. The Cochrane Collaboration, pp 136-145.
19. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ (1999) Atraumatic restorative treatment for dental caries. STI Book b. v, Nijmegen, p 58.
20. Neto RG, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris JRP, Navarro MF (2008) One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 4: 26-33.
21. Thompson SG (1994) Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ 309: 1351-1355.
22. Frencken JE, Taifour D, Van't Hof MA (2006) Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6. 3 years. J Dent Res 85: 622-626.
23. Frencken JE, Van't Hof MA, Taifour D, Al-Zaher I (2007) Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6. 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 35: 207-214.
24. Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH (2003) Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Quintessence Int 34: 31-37.
25. Kalf-Scholte SM, van Amerongen WE, Smith AJ, van Haastrecht HJ (2003) Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year clinical study in Malawi-comparison of conventional amalgam and ART restorations. J Public Health Dent 63: 99-103.
26. Mandari GJ, Truin GJ, van't Hof MA, Frencken JE (2001) Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years. Caries Res 35: 90-94.
27. Mandari GJ, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA (2003) Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches. Caries Res 37: 246-253.
28. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T, Frencken JE (1996) Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand-survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent 56: 141-145.
29. Rahimtoola S, van Amerongen E (2002) Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities. ASDC J Dent Child 69: 16-26.
30. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van 't Hof MA, Truin GJ (2002) Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years. Caries Res 36: 437-444.
31. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, Van't Hof MA, Truin GJ, van Palenstein Helderman WH (2003) Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation--survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 31: 122-128.
32. Yip KH, Smales RJ, Gao W, Peng D (2002) The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: an evaluation after 12 months. J Am Dent Assoc 133: 744-751.
33. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM (2002) Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Quintessence Int 33: 17-21.
34. Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM, Yip HK, Smales RJ (2004) Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Int Dent J 54: 42-66.
35. The Cochrane Collaboration (2006) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4. 2. 6. The Cochrane Collaboration, pp 97-99.
36. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Götrick B, Bornstein R, Thorell J (1999) Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries. A multi-centre study. Caries Res 33: 171-177.
37. Ngo HC, Mount G, Mc Intyre J, Tuisuva J, Von Doussa RJ (2006) Chemical exchange between glass-ionomer restorations and residual carious dentine in permanent molars: an in vivo study. J Dent 34: 608-613.
38. Smales RJ, Ngo HC, Yip KH, Yu C (2005) Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars. Am J Dent 18: 188-193.
39. ten Cate JM, van Duinen RNB (1995) Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 74: 1266-1271.
40. Chalmers TC, Matta RJ, Smith H Jr, Kunzler AM (1977) Evidence favoring the use of anticoagulants in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 297: 1091-1096.
41. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG (1995) Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. J Am Med Assoc 273: 408-412.
42. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ (1999) Atraumatic restorative treatment for dental caries. STI Book b. v, Nijmegen, pp 76-81.
43. Mickenautsch S, Grossman E (2006) Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): factors affecting success. J Appl Oral Sci 14: 34-36.
44. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357: 1191-1194.