The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-art restorations

International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 251-258

  Bonifácio, Clarissa Calil ^a   Hesse, Daniela ^b   Raggio, Daniela Prócida ^b   Bönecker, Marcelo ^b   Van Loveren, Cor ^a   Van Amerongen, W Evert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUJI IX; GLASS IONOMER; HI DENSE; HI-DENSE; MAXXION;

ARTICLE; ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DENTAL ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PROSTHESIS REPAIR; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MOLAR; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH EXFOLIATION; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 84878743883     PISSN: 09607439     EISSN: 1365263X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2012.01259.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Frencken JE. Evolution of the ART approach: highlights and achievements. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17(Suppl): 78-83.
2. Holmgren CJ, Frencken JE. Conclusions from the symposium: two decades of ART: success through research. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17(Suppl): 134-136.
3. Rahimtoola S, van Amerongen E. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities. ASDC J Dent Child 2002; 69: 16-26.
4. Schriks MC, van Amerongen WE. Atraumatic perspectives of ART: psychological and physiological aspects of treatment with and without rotary instruments. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 15-20.
5. Frencken JE, Van't Hof MA, Van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ. Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 120-123.
6. van't Hof MA, Frencken JE, van Palenstein Helderman WH, Holmgren CJ. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for managing dental caries: a meta-analysis. Int Dent J 2006; 56: 345-351.
7. de Amorim RG, Leal SC, Frencken JE. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 429-441.
8. Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Frencken JE, van't Hof M. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars. Am J Dent 2006; 19: 359-363.
9. Topaloglu-Ak A, Eden E, Frencken JE, Oncag O. Two years survival rate of class II composite resin restorations prepared by ART with and without a chemomechanical caries removal gel in primary molars. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13: 325-332.
10. van Gemert-Schriks MC, van Amerongen WE, ten Cate JM, Aartman IH. Three-year survival of single- and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11: 337-343.
11. da Franca C, Colares V, Van Amerongen E. Two-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary molars class I and II restorations. Int J Paediatr Dent 2011; 21: 249-253.
12. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972; 132: 133-135.
13. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. How effective is ART in the management of dental caries? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999; 27: 423-430.
14. Bonifacio CC, Kleverlaan CJ, Raggio DP, Werner A, de Carvalho RC, van Amerongen WE. Physical-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Aust Dent J 2009; 54: 233-237.
15. Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of a condensable metal-reinforced glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Br Dent J 2001; 190: 317-321.
16. Seale NS, Casamassimo PS. Access to dental care for children in the United States: a survey of general practitioners. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1630-1640.
17. Burke FJ, McHugh S, Saw L et al. UK dentists' attitudes and behaviour towards Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for primary teeth. Br Dent J 2005; 199: 365-369.
18. Frencken JE, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P, Pilot T. An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after one year. Int Dent J 1994; 44: 460-464.
19. Kemoli AM, van Amerongen WE. Influence of the cavity-size on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2009; 19: 423-430.
20. Roeleveld AC, van Amerongen WE, Mandari GJ. Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of Class II glass ionomer restorations. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2006; 7: 85-91.
21. Kemoli AM, van Amerongen WE, Opinya G. Influence of the experience of operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations: two-year results. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2009; 10: 227-232.
22. Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR. The Hall Technique; a randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months. BMC Oral Health 2007; 7: 18.
23. Molina GF, Cabral RJ, Frencken JE. The ART approach: clinical aspects reviewed. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17(Suppl): 89-98.
24. Mickenautsch S, Kopsala J, Rudolph MJ, Ogunbodede EO. Clinical evaluation of the ART approach and materials in peri-urban farm schools of the Johannesburg area. SADJ 2000; 55: 364-368.
25. Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM, Yip HK, Smales RJ. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Int Dent J 2004; 54: 42-46.
26. Kemoli AM, Opinya GN, van Amerongen WE, Mwalili SM. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed. Pediatr Dent 2011; 33: 246-251.
27. Mickenautsch S, Munshi I, Grossman ES. Comparative cost of ART and conventional treatment within a dental school clinic. SADJ 2002; 57: 52-58.
28. Shintome LK, Nagayassu MP, Di Nicolo R, Myaki SI. Microhardness of glass ionomer cements indicated for the ART technique according to surface protection treatment and storage time. Braz Oral Res 2009; 23: 439-445.
29. Ersin NK, Candan U, Aykut A, Oncag O, Eronat C, Kose T. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 1529-1536.
30. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14: 233-240.
31. Boon CP, Visser NL, Kemoli AM, van Amerongen WE. ART class II restoration loss in primary molars: re-restoration or not? Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010; 11: 228-231.