Chromosome conformation capture technologies and their impact in understanding genome function

Chromosoma

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 33-44

  Sati, Satish ^a,b   Cavalli, Giacomo ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS   (France)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

3C; ChIA PET; Chromosome conformation capture; Genome structure and function; Hi C

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOME; EPIGENETICS; GENOME; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; CONFORMATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

DNA BINDING PROTEIN;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMES; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84964681430     PISSN: 00095915     EISSN: 14320886     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-016-0593-6     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Andrey G et al (2013) A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 340:1234167. doi:10.1126/science.1234167
2. Apostolou E et al (2013) Genome-wide chromatin interactions of the Nanog locus in pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 12:699–712. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.013
3. Bantignies F et al (2011) Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 144:214–226. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.026
4. Belmont AS (2002) Mitotic chromosome scaffold structure: new approaches to an old controversy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:15855–15857. doi:10.1073/pnas.262672799
5. Branco MR, Pombo A (2006) Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol 4:e138. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040138
6. Cattoni DI, Valeri A, Le Gall A, Nollmann M (2015) A matter of scale: how emerging technologies are redefining our view of chromosome architecture. Trends Genet 31:454–464. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2015.05.011
7. Cavalli G, Misteli T (2013) Functional implications of genome topology. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:290–299. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2474
8. Comet I, Schuettengruber B, Sexton T, Cavalli G (2011) A chromatin insulator driving three-dimensional Polycomb response element (PRE) contacts and Polycomb association with the chromatin fiber. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:2294–2299. doi:10.1073/pnas.1002059108
9. Cremer C, Cremer T, Gray JW (1982) Induction of chromosome damage by ultraviolet light and caffeine: correlation of cytogenetic evaluation and flow karyotype. Cytometry 2:287–290. doi:10.1002/cyto.990020504
10. Cremer M et al (2003) Inheritance of gene density-related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei. J Cell Biol 162:809–820. doi:10.1083/jcb.200304096
11. Cremer T, Cremer C (2006) Rise, fall and resurrection of chromosome territories: a historical perspective. Part II. Fall and resurrection of chromosome territories during the 1950s to 1980s. Part III. Chromosome territories and the functional nuclear architecture: experiments and models from the 1990s to the present. Eur J Histochem 50:223–272
12. Croft JA, Bridger JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore WA (1999) Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 145:1119–1131
13. Dekker J (2006) The three ‘C’ s of chromosome conformation capture: controls, controls, controls. Nat Methods 3:17–21. doi:10.1038/nmeth823
14. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N (2002) Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295:1306–1311. doi:10.1126/science.1067799
15. Dixon JR et al (2012) Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485:376–380. doi:10.1038/nature11082
16. Dostie J et al (2006) Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res 16:1299–1309. doi:10.1101/gr.5571506
17. Dryden NH et al (2014) Unbiased analysis of potential targets of breast cancer susceptibility loci by Capture Hi-C. Genome Res 24:1854–1868. doi:10.1101/gr.175034.114
18. Duan Z et al (2012) A genome-wide 3C-method for characterizing the three-dimensional architectures of genomes. Methods 58:277–288. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.06.018
19. Ferraiuolo MA, Sanyal A, Naumova N, Dekker J, Dostie J (2012) From cells to chromatin: capturing snapshots of genome organization with 5C technology. Methods 58:255–267. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.10.011
20. Fraser J, Rousseau M, Shenker S, Ferraiuolo MA, Hayashizaki Y, Blanchette M, Dostie J (2009) Chromatin conformation signatures of cellular differentiation. Genome Biol 10:R37. doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-4-r37
21. Fullwood MJ et al (2009) An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 462:58–64. doi:10.1038/nature08497
22. Gall JG (2003) The centennial of the Cajal body. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:975–980. doi:10.1038/nrm1262
23. Gavrilov AA, Golov AK, Razin SV (2013a) Actual ligation frequencies in the chromosome conformation capture procedure. PLoS One 8:e60403. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060403
24. Gavrilov AA, Gushchanskaya ES, Strelkova O, Zhironkina O, Kireev II, Iarovaia OV, Razin SV (2013b) Disclosure of a structural milieu for the proximity ligation reveals the elusive nature of an active chromatin hub. Nucleic Acids Res 41:3563–3575. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt067
25. Ghavi-Helm Y, Klein FA, Pakozdi T, Ciglar L, Noordermeer D, Huber W, Furlong EE (2014) Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature 512:96–100. doi:10.1038/nature13417
26. Grob S, Schmid MW, Luedtke NW, Wicker T, Grossniklaus U (2013) Characterization of chromosomal architecture in Arabidopsis by chromosome conformation capture. Genome Biol 14:R129. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-11-r129
27. Hagege H et al (2007) Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3C-qPCR). Nat Protoc 2:1722–1733. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.243
28. Handoko L et al (2011) CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nat Genet 43:630–638. doi:10.1038/ng.857
29. Heitz E (1928) Das Heterochromatin der Moose. Jahrb Wiss Botanik 69:762–818
30. Horike S, Cai S, Miyano M, Cheng JF, Kohwi-Shigematsu T (2005) Loss of silent-chromatin looping and impaired imprinting of DLX5 in Rett syndrome. Nat Genet 37:31–40. doi:10.1038/ng1491
31. Hsieh TH, Weiner A, Lajoie B, Dekker J, Friedman N, Rando OJ (2015) Mapping nucleosome resolution chromosome folding in yeast by Micro-C. Cell 162:108–119. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.048
32. Hughes JR et al (2014) Analysis of hundreds of cis-regulatory landscapes at high resolution in a single, high-throughput experiment. Nat Genet 46:205–212. doi:10.1038/ng.2871
33. Imakaev M et al (2012) Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nat Methods 9:999–1003. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2148
34. Jager R et al (2015) Capture Hi-C identifies the chromatin interactome of colorectal cancer risk loci. Nat Commun 6:6178. doi:10.1038/ncomms7178
35. Jin F et al (2013) A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 503:290–294. doi:10.1038/nature12644
36. Kalhor R, Tjong H, Jayathilaka N, Alber F, Chen L (2012) Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nat Biotechnol 30:90–98. doi:10.1038/nbt.2057
37. Kolovos P et al (2014) Targeted chromatin capture (T2C): a novel high resolution high throughput method to detect genomic interactions and regulatory elements. Epigenetics Chromatin 7:10. doi:10.1186/1756-8935-7-10
38. Lajoie BR, van Berkum NL, Sanyal A, Dekker J (2009) My5C: web tools for chromosome conformation capture studies. Nat Methods 6:690–691. doi:10.1038/nmeth1009-690
39. Le TB, Imakaev MV, Mirny LA, Laub MT (2013) High-resolution mapping of the spatial organization of a bacterial chromosome. Science 342:731–734. doi:10.1126/science.1242059
40. Lieberman-Aiden E et al (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326:289–293. doi:10.1126/science.1181369
41. Lomvardas S, Barnea G, Pisapia DJ, Mendelsohn M, Kirkland J, Axel R (2006) Interchromosomal interactions and olfactory receptor choice. Cell 126:403–413. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.035
42. Ma W et al (2015) Fine-scale chromatin interaction maps reveal the cis-regulatory landscape of human lincRNA genes. Nat Methods 12:71–78. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3205
43. Marbouty M et al (2015) Condensin- and replication-mediated bacterial chromosome folding and origin condensation revealed by Hi-C and super-resolution imaging. Mol Cell 59:588–602. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.020
44. Maurano MT et al (2012) Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337:1190–1195. doi:10.1126/science.1222794
45. McCord RP et al (2013) Correlated alterations in genome organization, histone methylation, and DNA-lamin A/C interactions in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Genome Res 23:260–269. doi:10.1101/gr.138032.112
46. Mifsud B et al (2015) Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C. Nat Genet 47:598–606. doi:10.1038/ng.3286
47. Misteli T (2010) Higher-order genome organization in human disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a000794. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000794
48. Nagano T et al (2013) Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502:59–64. doi:10.1038/nature12593
49. Nagano T, Varnai C, Schoenfelder S, Javierre BM, Wingett SW, Fraser P (2015) Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation. Genome Biol 16:175. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0753-7
50. Naumova N, Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, Zhan Y, Lajoie BR, Mirny LA, Dekker J (2013) Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342:948–953. doi:10.1126/science.1236083
51. Nora EP et al (2012) Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485:381–385. doi:10.1038/nature11049
52. Phillips-Cremins JE et al (2013) Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 153:1281–1295. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053
53. Pope BD et al (2014) Topologically associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation. Nature 515:402–405. doi:10.1038/nature13986
54. Rao SS et al (2014) A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159:1665–1680. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021
55. Rousseau M, Crutchley JL, Miura H, Suderman M, Blanchette M, Dostie J (2014a) Hox in motion: tracking HoxA cluster conformation during differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res 42:1524–1540. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt998
56. Rousseau M, Ferraiuolo MA, Crutchley JL, Wang XQ, Miura H, Blanchette M, Dostie J (2014b) Classifying leukemia types with chromatin conformation data. Genome Biol 15:R60. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-4-r60
57. Sahlen P et al (2015) Genome-wide mapping of promoter-anchored interactions with close to single-enhancer resolution. Genome Biol 16:156. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0727-9
58. Sandhu KS et al (2012) Large-scale functional organization of long-range chromatin interaction networks. Cell Rep 2:1207–1219. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.022
59. Schoenfelder S et al (2015) The pluripotent regulatory circuitry connecting promoters to their long-range interacting elements. Genome Res 25:582–597. doi:10.1101/gr.185272.114
60. Schoenfelder S et al (2010) Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 42:53–61. doi:10.1038/ng.496
61. Sexton T, Cavalli G (2015) The role of chromosome domains in shaping the functional genome. Cell 160:1049–1059. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.040
62. Sexton T et al (2012) Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148:458–472. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010
63. Simonis M et al (2006) Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet 38:1348–1354. doi:10.1038/ng1896
64. Tang Z et al (2015) CTCF-mediated human 3D genome architecture reveals chromatin topology for transcription. Cell 163:1611–1627. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.024
65. Tiwari VK, Cope L, McGarvey KM, Ohm JE, Baylin SB (2008) A novel 6C assay uncovers Polycomb-mediated higher order chromatin conformations. Genome Res 18:1171–1179. doi:10.1101/gr.073452.107
66. Trosko JE (2003) Human stem cells as targets for the aging and diseases of aging processes. Med Hypotheses 60:439–447. doi:10.1016/s0306-9877(02)00446-2
67. Umbarger MA et al (2011) The three-dimensional architecture of a bacterial genome and its alteration by genetic perturbation. Mol Cell 44:252–264. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.010
68. van de Werken HJ, de Vree PJ, Splinter E, Holwerda SJ, Klous P, de Wit E, de Laat W (2012a) 4C technology: protocols and data analysis. Methods Enzymol 513:89–112. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-391938-0.00004-5
69. van de Werken HJ et al (2012b) Robust 4C-seq data analysis to screen for regulatory DNA interactions. Nat Methods 9:969–972. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2173
70. Vietri Rudan M, Barrington C, Henderson S, Ernst C, Odom DT, Tanay A, Hadjur S (2015) Comparative Hi-C reveals that CTCF underlies evolution of chromosomal domain architecture. Cell Rep 10:1297–1309. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.004
71. Walter C, Schuetzmann D, Rosenbauer F, Dugas M (2014) Basic4Cseq: an R/Bioconductor package for analyzing 4C-seq data. Bioinformatics 30:3268–3269. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu497
72. Wang KC et al (2011) A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature 472:120–124. doi:10.1038/nature09819
73. Williamson I et al (2014) Spatial genome organization: contrasting views from chromosome conformation capture and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genes Dev 28:2778–2791. doi:10.1101/gad.251694.114
74. Wurtele H, Chartrand P (2006) Genome-wide scanning of HoxB1-associated loci in mouse ES cells using an open-ended chromosome conformation capture methodology. Chromosome Res 14:477–495. doi:10.1007/s10577-006-1075-0
75. Zhao Z et al (2006) Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat Genet 38:1341–1347. doi:10.1038/ng1891
76. Zhou X, Lowdon RF, Li D, Lawson HA, Madden PA, Costello JF, Wang T (2013) Exploring long-range genome interactions using the WashU Epigenome Browser. Nat Methods 10:375–376. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2440