Magnetoencephalography in stroke recovery and rehabilitation

Frontiers in Neurology

Volumn 7, Issue MAR, 2016, Pages

  Paggiaro, Andrea ^a   Birbaumer, Niels ^a,b   Cavinato, Marianna ^a   Turco, Cristina ^a   Formaggio, Emanuela ^a   Del Felice, Alessandra ^c   Masiero, Stefano ^c   Piccione, Francesco ^a  

^a IRCCS SAN CAMILLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Brain computer interface; Connectivity; Magnetoencephalography; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONSTRAINT MOVEMENT THERAPY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; KINEMATICS; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOVEMENT THERAPY; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROREHABILITATION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84964642766     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16642295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00035     Document Type: Review

References (120)

1. Stefan H, Hummel C, Scheler G, Genow A, Druschky K, Tilz C, et al. Magnetic brain source imaging of focal epileptic activity: a synopsis of 455 cases. Brain (2003) 126:2396-405. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg239
2. Knowlton RC, Razdan SN, Limdi N, Elgavish RA, Killen J, Blount J, et al. Effect of epilepsy magnetic source imaging on intracranial electrode placement. Ann Neurol (2009) 65:716-23. doi:10.1002/ana.21660
3. Hari R, Kujala MV. Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. Physiol Rev (2009) 89:453-79. doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2007
4. Wilson HS. Continuous head-localization and data correction in a whole-cortex MEG sensor. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol (2004) 2004:56. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2007.02.051
5. Gavaret M, Badier JM, Marquis P, Bartolomei F, Chauvel P. Electric source imaging in temporal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol (2004) 21:267-82. doi:10.1097/01.WNP.0000139929.06455.82
6. Wennberg R, Valiante T, Cheyne D. EEG and MEG in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: where do the spikes really come from? Clin Neurophysiol (2011) 122:1295-313. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.11.019
7. Ahlfors SP, Han J, Lin FH, Witzel T, Belliveau JW, Hämäläinen MS, et al. Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources. Hum Brain Mapp (2010) 31:140-9. doi:10.1002/hbm.20851
8. Dehghani N, Cash SS, Halgren E. Topographical frequency dynamics within EEG and MEG sleep spindles. Clin Neurophysiol (2011) 122:229-35. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.06.018
9. Cohen D, Cuffin BN. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol (1983) 56:38-51. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90005-6
10. Birbaumer N, Murguialday AR, Cohen L. Brain-computer interface in paralysis. Curr Opin Neurol (2008) 21:634-8. doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e328315ee2d
11. Wang W, Collinger JL, Perez MA, Tyler-Kabara EC, Cohen LG, Birbaumer N, et al. Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am (2010) 21:57-78. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.003
12. Dimyan MA, Cohen LG. Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke. Nat Rev Neurol (2011) 7:76-85. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.200
13. Buch E, Weber C, Cohen LG, Braun C, Dimyan MA, Ard T, et al. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke (2008) 39:910-7. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505313
14. Birbaumer N, Kimmel HD, editors. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. (1979).
15. Niso G, Bruña R, Pereda E, Gutiérrez R, Bajo R, Maestú F, et al. Towards an integrated toolbox to characterize functional and effective brain connectivity. Neuroinformatics (2013) 11:405-34. doi:10.1007/s12021-013-9186-1
16. Braitenberg V, Schüz A. Anatomy of the Cortex: Statistics and Geometry. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Publishing (1991).
17. Brookes MJ, Zumer JM, Stevenson CM, Hale JR, Barnes GR, Vrba J, et al. Investigating spatial specificity and data averaging in MEG. Neuroimage (2010) 49:525-38. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.043
18. van Drongelen W, Yuchtman M, Van Veen BD, Van Huffelen AC. A spatial filtering technique to detect and localize multiple sources in the brain. Brain Topogr (1996) 9:39-49. doi:10.1007/BF01191641
19. van Veen BD, Van Drongelen W, Yuchtman M, Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng (1997) 44:867-80. doi:10.1109/10.623056
20. Sekihara K, Nagarajan SS, Poeppel D, Marantz A, Miyashita Y. Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng (2001) 48:760-71. doi:10.1109/10.930901
21. Sekihara K, Nagarajan SS, Poeppel D, Marantz A. Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer technique in the presence of correlated neural activities: effects on signal intensity and time-course estimates. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng (2002) 49:1534-46. doi:10.1109/TBME.2002.805485
22. Sekihara K, Nagarajan SS, Poeppel D, Marantz A, Miyashita Y. Application of an MEG eigenspace beamformer to reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources. Hum Brain Mapp (2002) 15:199-215. doi:10.1002/hbm.10019
23. Brookes MJ, Vrba J, Robinson SE, Stevenson CM, Peters AM, Barnes GR, et al. Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging. Neuroimage (2008) 39:788-802. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.050
24. Quraan MA, Cheyne D. Reconstruction of correlated brain activity with adaptive spatial filters in MEG. Neuroimage (2010) 49:2387-400. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.012
25. Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput (1994) 32:35-42. doi:10.1007/BF02512476
26. Pasqual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: new method to localize electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol (1994) 18:49-65. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(84)90014-X
27. Hillebrand A, Barnes GR. Beamformer analysis of MEG data. Int Rev Neurobiol (2005) 68:149-71. doi:10.1016/S0074-7742(05)68006-3
28. van Veen BD, Buckley KM. Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering. IEEE ASSP Mag (1988) 5:4-24. doi:10.1109/53.665
29. Michel CM, Murray MM, Lantz G, Gonzalez S, Spinelli L, Grave de Peralta R. EEG source imaging. Clin Neurophysiol (2004) 115:2195-222. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.001
30. Gaetz WC, Cheyne DO. Localization of human somatosensory cortex using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography. Neurosci Lett (2003) 340:161-4. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00108-3
31. Cheyne D, Bakhtazad L, Gaetz W. Spatiotemporal mapping of cortical activity accompanying voluntary movements using an event related beamforming approach. Hum Brain Mapp (2006) 27:213-29. doi:10.1002/hbm.20178
32. Buch ER, Modir Shanechi SA, Fourkas AD, Weber C, Birbaumer N, Cohen LG. Parietofrontal integrity determines neural modulation associated with grasping imagery after stroke. Brain (2012) 135(Pt 2):596-614. doi:10.1093/brain/awr331
33. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol (2004) 61:1844-8. doi:10.1001/archneur.61.12.1844
34. Ward NS. Future perspectives in functional neuroimaging in stroke recovery. Eura Medicophys (2007) 43:285-94.
35. Truelsen T, Piechowski-Józwiak B, Bonita R, Mathers C, Bogousslavsky J, Boysen G. Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data. Eur J Neurol (2006) 13:581-98. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01138.x
36. Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jacobi F, Allgulander C, Alonso J, Beghi E, et al. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol (2011) 21:718-79. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.08.008
37. Eliassen JC, Boespflug EL, Lamy M, Allendorfer J, Chu WJ, Szaflarski JP. Brain-mapping techniques for evaluating poststroke recovery and rehabilitation: a review. Top Stroke Rehabil (2008) 15:427-50. doi:10.1310/tsr1505-427
38. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke (2003) 34:2181-6. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD
39. Young J, Forster A. Review of stroke rehabilitation. BMJ (2007) 334:86-90. doi:10.1136/bmj.39059.456794.68
40. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol (2009) 8:741-54. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4
41. Rehme AK, Eickhoff SB, Wang LE, Fink GR, Grefkes C. Dynamic causal modeling of cortical activity from the acute to the chronic stage after stroke. Neuroimage (2011) 55:1147-58. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.014
42. Crofts JJ, Higham DJ, Bosnell R, Jbabdi S, Matthews PM, Behrens TE, et al. Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke. Neuroimage (2011) 54:161-9. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.032
43. Grefkes C, Fink GR. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain (2011) 134:1264-76. doi:10.1093/brain/awr033
44. Fornito A, Zalesky A, Bassett DS, Meunier D, Ellison-Wright I, Yücel M, et al. Genetic influences on cost-efficient organization of human cortical functional networks. J Neurosci (2011) 31:3261-70. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4858-10.2011
45. Passingham RE, Stephan KE, Kötter R. The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci (2002) 3:606-16. doi:10.1038/nrn893
46. Nomura EM, Gratton C, Visser RM, Kayser A, Perez F, D'Esposito M. Double dissociation of two cognitive control networks in patients with focal brain lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2010) 107:12017-22. doi:10.1073/pnas.1002431107
47. Laughlin SB, Sejnowski TJ. Communication in neuronal networks. Science (2003) 301:1870-4. doi:10.1126/science.1089662
48. Buzsáki G, Geisler C, Henze DA, Wang XJ. Interneuron diversity series: circuit complexity and axon wiring economy of cortical interneurons. Trends Neurosci (2004) 27:186-93. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.02.007
49. Achard S, Bullmore E. Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PLoS Comput Biol (2007) 3:e17. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030017
50. Bassett DS, Bullmore ET, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Apud JA, Weinberger DR, Coppola R. Cognitive fitness of cost-efficient brain functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009) 106:11747-52. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903641106
51. van den Heuvel MP, Stam CJ, Kahn RS, Hulshoff Pol HE. Efficiency of functional brain networks and intellectual performance. J Neurosci (2009) 29:7619-24. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1443-09.2009
52. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage (2010) 52:1059-69. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
53. Honey CJ, Sporns O. Dynamical consequences of lesions in cortical networks. Hum Brain Mapp (2008) 29:802-9. doi:10.1002/hbm.20579
54. Alstott J, Breakspear M, Hagmann P, Cammoun L, Sporns O. Modeling the impact of lesions in the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol (2009) 5:e1000408. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000408
55. Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Eickhoff SB, Dafotakis M, Küst J, Karbe H, et al. Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol (2008) 63:236-46. doi:10.1002/ana.21228
56. Rosenblum MG, Pikovsky AS. Detecting direction of coupling in interacting oscillators. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys (2001) 64:045202. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.045202
57. Kaminski MJ, Blinowska KJ. A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biol Cybern (1991) 65:203-10. doi:10.1007/BF00198091
58. Rehme AK, Grefkes C. Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging-based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans. J Physiol (2013) 591:17-31. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2012.243469
59. Burke Quinlan E, Dodakian L, See J, McKenzie A, Le V, Wojnowicz M, et al. Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke. Ann Neurol (2015) 77:132-45. doi:10.1002/ana.24309
60. Bajaj S, Butler AJ, Drake D, Dhamala M. Functional organization and restoration of the brain motor-execution network after stroke and rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci (2015) 9:173. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00173
61. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale. Stroke (2002) 33:1840-4. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000019289.15440.F2
62. Krakauer JW. Arm function after stroke: from physiology to recovery. Semin Neurol (2005) 25:384-95. doi:10.1055/s-2005-923533
63. Shadmehr R, Wise SP. The computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing: a foundation for motor learning. Comput Neurosci (2007) 18:1-3. doi:10.1080/09548980701275714
64. Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost SB, Zoubina EV, Plautz EJ, Mahnken JD, et al. Effects of small ischemic lesions in the primary motor cortex on neurophysiological organization in ventral premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol (2006) 96:3506-11. doi:10.1152/jn.00792.2006
65. Brown CE, Li P, Boyd JD, Delaney KR, Murphy TH. Extensive turnover of dendritic spines and vascular remodeling in cortical tissues recovering from stroke. J Neurosci (2007) 27:4101-9. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4295-06.2007
66. Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci (2009) 10:861-72. doi:10.1038/nrn2735
67. Yu X, Zuo Y. Spine plasticity in the motor cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2011) 21:169-74. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.07.010
68. Roiha K, Kirveskari E, Kaste M, Mustanoja S, Mäkelä JP, Salonen O, et al. Reorganization of the primary somatosensory cortex during stroke recovery. Clin Neurophysiol (2011) 122:339-45. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.06.032
69. Ward NS. Neural plasticity and recovery of function. Prog Brain Res (2005) 150:527-35. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50036-0
70. Nudo RJ. Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2006) 16:638-44. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.004
71. Sawaki L, Butler AJ, Leng X, Wassenaar PA, Mohammad YM, Blanton S, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy results in increased motor map area in subjects 3 to 9 months after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair (2008) 22:505-13. doi:10.1177/1545968308317531
72. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Pasqualetti P, Filippi M, Rossini PM. Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the 'affected' and 'unaffected' hemispheres in human stroke. Brain Res (1998) 803:1-8. doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00505-8
73. Urakami Y. Relationships between sleep spindles and activities of the cerebral cortex after hemispheric stroke as determined by simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings. J Clin Neurophysiol (2009) 26:248-56. doi:10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181af209c
74. Del Felice A, Arcaro C, Storti SF, Fiaschi A, Manganotti P. Electrical source imaging of sleep spindles. Clin EEG Neurosci (2014) 45:184-92. doi:10.1177/1550059413497716
75. Poryazova R, Huber R, Khatami R, Werth E, Brugger P, Barath K, et al. Topographic sleep EEG changes in the acute and chronic stage of hemispheric stroke. J Sleep Res (2015) 24:54-65. doi:10.1111/jsr.12208
76. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol (1996) 75:2144-9.
77. Shimizu T, Hosaki A, Hino T, Sato M, Komori T, Hirai S, et al. Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain (2002) 125:1896-907. doi:10.1093/brain/awf183
78. Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol (2004) 55:400-9. doi:10.1002/ana.10848
79. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD. Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke. Brain (2008) 131:1381-90. doi:10.1093/brain/awn051
80. Swayne OB, Rothwell JC, Ward NS, Greenwood RJ. Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex (2008) 18:1909-22. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm218
81. Dayan E, Cohen LG. Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron (2011) 72:443-54. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.008
82. Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM, Barman J, Bowman MH, et al. Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke: transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke (2013) 44:1383-8. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000559
83. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke (1999) 30:586-92. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.3.586
84. Ramos-Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, Läer L, Yilmaz O, Brasil FL, et al. Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study. Ann Neurol (2013) 74:100-8. doi:10.1002/ana.23879
85. Corbetta M, Kincade MJ, Lewis C, Snyder AZ, Sapir A. Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nat Neurosci (2005) 8:1603-10. doi:10.1038/nn1574
86. Vuilleumier P, Schwartz S, Verdon V, Maravita A, Hutton C, Husain M, et al. Abnormal attentional modulation of retinotopic cortex in parietal patients with spatial neglect. Curr Biol (2008) 18:1525-9. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.072
87. Mizuno K, Tsuji T, Rossetti Y, Pisella L, Ohde H, Liu M. Early visual processing is affected by clinical subtype in patients with unilateral spatial neglect: a magnetoencephalography study. Front Hum Neurosci (2013) 7:432. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00432
88. Tecchio F, Pasqualetti P, Zappasodi F, Tombini M, Lupoi D, Vernieri F, et al. Outcome prediction in acute monoemispheric stroke via magnetoencephalography. J Neurol (2007) 254:296-305. doi:10.1007/s00415-006-0355-0
89. Rossini PM, Altamura C, Ferreri F, Melgari JM, Tecchio F, Tombini M, et al. Neuroimaging experimental studies on brain plasticity in recovery from stroke. Eura Medicophys (2007) 43:241-54.
90. Hari R, Forss N, Avikainen S, Kirveskari E, Salenius S, Rizzolatti G. Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1998) 95:15061-5. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.15061
91. Avikainen S, Forss N, Hari R. Modulated activation of the human SI and SII cortices during observation of hand actions. Neuroimage (2002) 15:640-6. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1029
92. Järveläinen J, Schürmann M, Avikainen S, Hari R. Stronger reactivity of the human primary motor cortex during observation of live rather than video motor acts. Neuroreport (2001) 12:3493-5. doi:10.1097/00001756-200111160-00024
93. Wilson TW, Fleischer A, Archer D, Hayasaka S, Sawaki L. Oscillatory MEG motor activity reflects therapy-related plasticity in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair (2011) 25:188-93. doi:10.1177/1545968310378511
94. Jeannerod M, Frak V. Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Curr Opin Neurobiol (1999) 9:735-9. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00038-0
95. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage (2001) 14:S103-9. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
96. Burianová H, Marstaller L, Sowman P, Tesan G, Rich AN, Williams M, et al. Multimodal functional imaging of motor imagery using a novel paradigm. Neuroimage (2013) 71:50-8. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.001
97. Di Rienzo F, Guillot A, Mateo S, Daligault S, Delpuech C, Rode G, et al. Neuroplasticity of imagined wrist actions after spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Exp Brain Res (2015) 233:291-302. doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4114-7
98. Fujioka T, Ween JE, Jamali S, Stuss DT, Ross B. Changes in neuromagnetic beta-band oscillation after music-supported stroke rehabilitation. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2012) 1252:294-304. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06436.x
99. Breier JI, Maher LM, Schmadeke S, Hasan KM, Papanicolaou AC. Changes in language-specific brain activation after therapy for aphasia using magnetoencephalography: a case study. Neurocase (2007) 13:169-77. doi:10.1080/13554790701448200
100. Breier JI, Juranek J, Maher LM, Schmadeke S, Men D, Papanicolaou AC. Behavioral and neurophysiologic response to therapy for chronic aphasia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (2009) 90:2026-33. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.144
101. Breier JI, Randle S, Maher LM, Papanicolaou AC. Changes in maps of language activity activation following melodic intonation therapy using magnetoencephalography: two case studies. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol (2010) 32:309-14. doi:10.1080/13803390903029293
102. Musso M, Weiller C, Kiebel S, Müller SP, Bülau P, Rijntjes M. Training-induced brain plasticity in aphasia. Brain (1999) 122:1781-90. doi:10.1093/brain/122.9.1781
103. Raboyeau G, De Boissezon X, Marie N, Balduyck S, Puel M, Bézy C, et al. Right hemisphere activation in recovery from aphasia: lesion effect or function recruitment? Neurology (2008) 70:290-8. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000287115.85956.87
104. Belin P, Van Eeckhout P, Zilbovicius M, Remy P, François C, Guillaume S, et al. Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: a PET study. Neurology (1996) 47:1504-11. doi:10.1212/WNL.47.6.1504
105. Léger A, Démonet JF, Ruff S, Aithamon B, Touyeras B, Puel M, et al. Neural substrates of spoken language rehabilitation in an aphasic patient: an fMRI study. Neuroimage (2002) 17:174-83. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1238
106. Meinzer M, Flaisch T, Breitenstein C, Wienbruch C, Elbert T, Rockstroh B. Functional re-recruitment of dysfunctional brain areas predicts language recovery in chronic aphasia. Neuroimage (2008) 39:2038-46. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.008
107. Fridriksson J, Morrow L. Cortical activation and language task difficulty in aphasia. Aphasiology (2005) 19:239-50. doi:10.1080/02687030444000714
108. Pulvermüller F, Hauk O, Zohsel K, Neininger B, Mohr B. Therapy-related reorganization of language in both hemispheres of patients with chronic aphasia. Neuroimage (2005) 28:481-9. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.038
109. Sporns O. The human connectome: a complex network. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2011) 1224:109-25. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05888.x
110. Cumberland Consensus Working Group, Cheeran B, Cohen L, Dobkin B, Ford G, Greenwood R, et al. The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair (2009) 23:97-107. doi:10.1177/1545968308326636
111. Broetz D, Braun C, Weber C, Soekadar SR, Caria A, Birbaumer N. Combination of brain-computer interface training and goal-directed physical therapy in chronic stroke: a case report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair (2010) 24:674-9. doi:10.1177/1545968310368683
112. Caria A, Weber C, Brötz D, Ramos A, Ticini LF, Gharabaghi A, et al. Chronic stroke recovery after combined BCI training and physiotherapy: a case report. Psychophysiology (2011) 48:578-82. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01117.x
113. Silvoni S, Ramos-Murguialday A, Cavinato M, Volpato C, Cisotto G, Turolla A, et al. Brain-computer interface in stroke: a review of progress. Clin EEG Neurosci (2011) 42:245-52. doi:10.1177/155005941104200410
114. Birbaumer N, Cohen LG. Brain-computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J Physiol (2007) 579:621-36. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125633
115. Castel-Lacanal E, Marque P, Tardy J, de Boissezon X, Guiraud V, Chollet F, et al. Induction of cortical plastic changes in wrist muscles by paired associative stimulation in the recovery phase of stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair (2009) 23:366-72. doi:10.1177/1545968308322841
116. Bi GQ, Poo MM. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J Neurosci (1998) 18:10464-72.
117. Clapp WC, Hamm JP, Kirk IJ, Teyler TJ. Translating long-term potentiation from animals to humans: a novel method for noninvasive assessment of cortical plasticity. Biol Psychiatry (2012) 71:496-502. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.08.021
118. Silvoni S, Cavinato M, Volpato C, Cisotto G, Genna C, Agostini M, et al. Kinematic and neurophysiological consequences of an assisted-force-feedback brain-machine interface training: a case study. Front Neurol (2013) 4:173. doi:10.3389/fneur.2013.00173
119. Sacchet MD, Mellinger J, Sitaram R, Braun C, Birbaumer N, Fetz E. Volitional control of neuromagnetic coherence. Front Neurosci (2012) 6:189. doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00189
120. Soekadar SR, Witkowski M, Mellinger J, Ramos A, Birbaumer N, Cohen LG. ERD-based online brain-machine interfaces (BMI) in the context of neurorehabilitation: optimizing BMI learning and performance. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng (2011) 19:542-9. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2166809