Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke: Transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy

Stroke

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1383-1388

  Taub, Edward ^a   Uswatte, Gitendra ^a   Mark, Victor W ^a,b,c   Morris, David M ^a   Barman, Joydip ^a   Bowman, Mary H ^a   Bryson, Camille ^a   Delgado, Adriana ^a   Bishop Mckay, Staci ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^c The University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

Author keywords

constraint induced movement therapy; hemiplegia; shaping; stroke rehabilitation; task practice; transfer package

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FOLLOW UP; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MOVEMENT THERAPY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TELECONSULTATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARM; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84876863154     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000559     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741-754.
2. Hoare B, Wasiak J, Imms C, Carey L. Constraint-induced movement therapy in the treatment of the upper limb in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007:Art. No.: CD004149. DOI:004110.001002/14651858. CD14004149.pub14651852.
3. Shaw SE, Morris DM, Uswatte G, McKay S, Meythaler JM, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy for recovery of upper-limb function following traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:769-778.
4. Mark VW, Taub E, Bashir K, Uswatte G, Delgado A, Bowman MH, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy can improve hemipa-retic progressive multiple sclerosis. Preliminary fndings. Mult Scler. 2008;14:992-994.
5. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilita-tion-a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237-251.
6. Morris DM, Shaw SE, Mark VW, Uswatte G, Barman J, Taub E. The infuence of neuropsychological characteristics on the use of CI therapy with persons with traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2006;21:131-137.
7. Mark VW, Taub E, Uswatte G, Bashir K, Cutter GR, Bryson C, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for the lower extremities in multiple sclerosis: case series with 4-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013, in press.
8. Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, Morris D, Crago JE, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1045-1049.
9. Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM. The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42:241-256.
10. Morris D, Taub E, Mark V. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy): characterizing the intervention protocol Eura Medicophys. 2006;42:257-268. PMID17039224.
11. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
12. Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:Art. No.: CD004433. DOI: 004410.001002/14651858.CD14004433. pub14651852.
13. Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on chronic stroke patients: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586-592. PMID10066856.
14. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, Villringer K, Villringer A, Taub E, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a powerful new technique to induce motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:624-628. PMID10378486.
15. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kölbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1374-1377. PMID12370871.
16. Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:204-209.
17. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Barman J, Crago J. Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of constraint-induced movement therapy to treatment outcome. NeuroRehabilitation. 2006;21:147-156.
18. Ploughman M, Corbett D. Can forced-use therapy be clinically applied after stroke? An exploratory randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1417-1423.
19. Gauthier LV, Taub E, Perkins C, Ortmann M, Mark VW, Uswatte G. Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:1520-1525.
20. Taub E, Uswatte G, Bowman MH, Mark VW, Delgado A, Bryson C, et al. Effect of CI therapy on arm use in chronic stroke patients with plegic hands. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:86-94.
21. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW III, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor defcit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-354.
22. Skinner BF. The Behavior of Organisms. New York, NY: Appleton-Century- Crofts; 1938.
23. Skinner BF. The Technology of Teaching. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1968.
24. Taub E, Crago J, Burgio L, Groomes T, Cook EW, DeLuca S, et al. An operant approach to overcoming learned nonuse after CNS damage in monkeys and man: the role of shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;61: 281-293. PMC1334416.
25. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67:1189-1194.
26. Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1498-1501.
27. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635-1639.
28. Morris D, Uswatte G, Crago J, Cook EW, III, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity motor function following stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:750-755.
29. Hodics TM, Nakatsuka K, Upreti B, Alex A, Smith PS, Pezzullo JC. Wolf Motor Function Test for characterizing moderate to severe hemipa-resis in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1963-1967.
30. Keppel G, Zedeck S. Data Analysis for Research Designs: Analysis of Variance and Multiple Regression/Correlation Approaches. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company; 1989.
31. Uswatte G, Taub E. Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes: lessons from Constraint-Induced Movement therapy. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:34-42.
32. Keith RA. Conceptual basis of outcome measures. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74:73-80.
33. Granger CV. The emerging science of functional assessment: our tool for outcomes analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:235-240.
34. Taub E, Lum PS, Hardin P, Mark VW, Uswatte G. AutoCITE: automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists. Stroke. 2005;36:1301-1304.