Mental imaging of motor activity in humans

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 735-739

  Jeannerod, Marc ^a   Frak, Victor ^a  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES COGNITIVES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN MAPPING; HUMAN; IMAGERY; IMAGINATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0032763133     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00038-0     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Parsons L.M., Fox P.T., Downs J.H., Glass T., Hirsch T.B., Martin C.C., Jerabek P.A., Lancaster J.L. Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature. 375:1995;54-58.
2. Parsons L.M., Gabrieli J.D.E., Phelps E.A., Gazzaniga M.S. Cerebrally lateralized mental representations of hand shape and movement. J Neurosci. 18:1998;6539-6548. In this paper, two split-brain subjects had to make handedness judgements for drawings representing right- or left-hand shapes shown in different orientations and presented to one visual hemifield (and thus to one hemisphere). Response accuracy was good when the side of the hand shown to the hemisphere corresponded to the side of the hand controlled by that hemisphere, but was severely degraded for the opposite combination. Hence, the authors conclude that mentally simulating one's action and recognising handedness both depend on lateralised mechanisms.
3. Johnson S.H. Cerebral organization of motor imagery. Contralateral control of grip selection in mentally represented prehension. Psychol Sci. 9:1998;219-222.
4. Gentilucci M., Daprati E., Gangitano M. Implicit visual analysis in handedness recognition. Conscious Cogn. 1998.
5. Wohlschläger A., Wohlschläger A. Mental and manual rotation. J Exp Psychol [Hum Perc Perf]. 24:1998;397-412.
6. Wexler M., Kosslyn S.M., Berthoz A. Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition. 68:1998;77-94.
7. Parsons L.M., Fox P.T. The neural basis of implicit movements used in recognising hand shape. Cogn Neuropsychol. 15:1998;583-615.
8. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psycol [Hum Perc Perf]. 24:1998;830-846.
9. de'Sperati C., Stucchi N. Recognizing the motion of a graspable object is guided by handedness. Neuroreport. 8:1997;2761-2765.
10. Jeannerod M. To act or not to act. Perspectives on representation of actions. Q J Exp Psychol. 52:1999;1-29.
11. Gallese V., Goldman A. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cog Sci. 12:1998;493-501.
12. Schwartz D.L., Black T. Inferences through imagined actions. Knowing by simulated doing. J Exp Psychol [Hum Perc Perf]. 25:1999;116-136.
13. Jeannerod M. Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia. 33:1995;1419-1432.
14. Sirigu A., Duhamel J.-R., Cohen L., Pillon B., Dubois B., Agid Y. The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science. 273:1996;1564-9999.
15. Decety J., Jeannerod M. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality. Does Fitts' law hold in motor imagery? Behav Brain Res. 72:1996;127-134.
16. Jeannerod M., Decety J. Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 5:1995;727-732.
17. Grafton S.T., Arbib M.A., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G. Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. 2. Observation compared with imagination. Exp Brain Res. 112:1996;103-111. This positron emission tomography study compared cortical activation during motor imagery of grasping movements with that during observation of the same movements being performed by an actor. In the latter condition, SMA, lateral area 6, area 45 in the inferior frontal gyrus and area 40 in the posterior parietal lobe were shown to be involved.
18. Mellet E., Petit L., Mazoyer B., Denis M., Tzourio N. Reopening the mental imagery debate. Lessons from functional anatomy. Neuroimage. 8:1998;129-139.
19. Deiber M.P., Ibanez V., Honda M., Sadato N., Raman R., Hallett M. Cerebral processes related to visuomotor imagery and generation of simple finger movements studied with positron emission tomography. Neuroimage. 7:1998;73-85. This positron emission tomography study stresses the fact that neural networks activated during motor imagery and motor performance are distinct. In the 'imagine only' condition, activation was oberved in the contralateral infero-parietal cortex, preSMA, anterior cingulate, premotor cortex and dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex. In the 'imagine, then move' condition, an additional activation was found in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex and lateral cerebellum. In addition, in the latter condition, activity was decreased in the inferior prefrontal cortex, suggesting that this area is involved in motor inhibition during motor imagery.
20. Sirigu A., Cohen L., Duhamel J.-R., Pillon B., Dubois B., Agid Y., Pierrot-Deseiligny C. Congruent unilateral impairments for real and imagined hand movements. Neuroreport. 6:1995;997-1001.
21. Dominey P., Decety J., Broussolle E., Chazot G., Jeannerod M. Motor imagery of a lateralized sequential task is assymetrically slowed in hemi-Parkinson patients. Neuropsychologia. 33:1995;727-741.
22. Roth M., Decety J., Raybaudi M., Massarelli R., Delon-Martin C., Segebarth C., Morand S., Gemignani A., Decorps M., Jeannerod M. Possible involvement of primary motor cortex in mentally simulated movement. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroreport. 7:1996;1280-1284.
23. Porro C.A., Francescato M.P., Cettolo V., Diamond M.E., Baraldi P., Zuiani C., Bazzocchi M., di Prampero P.E. Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery. A functional magnetic resonance study. J Neurosci. 16:1996;7688-7698.
24. Cochin S., Barthelemy C., Roux S., Martineau J. Observation and execution of movement. Similarities demonstrated by quatified electroencephalography. Eur J Neurosci. 11:1999;1839-1842.
25. Schnitzler A., Salenius S., Salmelin R., Jousmäki V., Hari R. Involvement of primary motor cortex in motor imagery; a neuromagnetic study. Neuroimage. 6:1997;201-208.
26. Lang W., Cheyne D., Hollinger P., Gerschlager W., Lindinger G. Electric and magnetic fields accompanying internal simulation of movement. Cogn Brain Res. 3:1998;125-129.
27. Fadiga L., Buccino G., Craighero L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Pavesi G. Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery. A magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia. 37:1999;147-158. An elegant study of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery of arm and finger movements, using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Motor-evoked potentials were larger for those muscles that were involved in the imagined movement. In addition, TMS applied to the right motor cortex increased corticospinal excitability on the left side only, whereas TMS applied to the left motor cortex increased exctibility bilaterally.
28. Hashimoto R., Rothwell J.C. Dynamic changes in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery. Exp Brain Res. 125:1999;75-81. This study reported the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex during motor imagery of wrist flexion/extension movements. In 5/9 subjects, motor-evoked potentials were larger in the flexor muscle during imagined flexion than during imagined extension, and vice versa for extensor muscles. The H-reflex was not modified during motor imagery, which suggests that the motor system can generate these commands without recourse to sensory feedback.
29. Kasai T., Kawai S., Kawanishi M., Yahagi S. Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery. Brain Res. 744:1997;147-150.
30. Bonnet M., Decety J., Requin J., Jeannerod M. Mental simulation of an action modulates the excitability of spinal reflex pathways in man. Cogn Brain Res. 5:1997;221-228.
31. Yahagi S., Shimura Y., Kasai T. An increase in cortical excitability with no change in spinal excitability during motor imagery. Percept Mot Skills. 83:1996;288-290.
32. Gandevia S.C., Wilson L.R., Inglis J.T., Burke D. Mental rehearsal of motor tasks recruits alpha motoneurons, but fails to recruit human fusimotor neurons selectively. J Physiol. 505:1997;259-266.
33. Crammond D.J. Motor imagery: never in your wildest dream. Trends Neurosci. 20:1997;54-57.
34. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn Brain Res. 3:1996;131-141.
35. Roure R., Collet C., Deschaumes-Molinaro C., Dittmar A., Raqa H., Delhomme G., Vernet-Maury E. Autonomic nervous system responses correlate with mental rehearsal in volleyball training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 78:1998;99-108.
36. Yagüez L., Nagel D., Hoffman H., Canavan A.G.M., Wist E., Hömberg V. A mental route to mental learning. Improving trajectorial kinematics through imagery training. Behav Brain Res. 90:1998;95-106.