Phylogeny of Rosa sections Chinenses and Synstylae (Rosaceae) based on chloroplast and nuclear markers

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 87, Issue , 2015, Pages 50-64

  Zhu, Zhang Ming ^a,b   Gao, Xin Fen ^a   Fougère Danezan, Marie ^a,c  

^a CHENGDU INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c KEY LABORATORY OF TROPICAL FOREST ECOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Hybridization; Incongruence; Phylogeny; Rosa; Section Chinenses; Section Synstylae

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; GENETIC MARKER; PLANT DNA;

BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; FAR EAST; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; PHYLOGENY; ROSE;

BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, PLANT; FAR EAST; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; ROSA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

CANIDAE; ROSACEAE;

EID: 84964213237     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Aguilar J.F., Rossello J.A., Feliner G.N. Nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) concerted evolution in natural and artificial hybrids of Armeria (Plumbaginaceae). Mol. Ecol. 1999, 8:1341-1346.
2. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19:716-723.
3. Anderson E. Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution 1948, 2:1-9.
4. Atienza S.G., Torres A.M., Millan T., Cubero J.I. Genetic diversity in Rosa as revealed by RAPDs. Agric. Conspec. Sci. 2005, 70:75-85.
5. Barrie F.R. Report of the general committee: 9. Taxon 2006, 55:795-800.
6. Barton N.H. The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10:551-568.
7. Baurain D., Brinkmann H., Philippe H. Lack of resolution in the animal phylogeny: closely spaced cladogeneses or undetected systematic errors?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:6-9.
8. Bruneau A., Starr J.R., Joly S. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Rosa: new evidence from chloroplast DNA sequences and an appraisal of current knowledge. Syst. Bot. 2007, 32:366-378.
9. Calvino C.I., Martinez S.G., Downie S.R. The evolutionary history of Eryngium (Apiaceae, Saniculoideae): rapid radiations, long distance dispersals, and hybridizations. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 46:1129-1150.
10. Campbell C.S., Evans R.C., Morgan D.R., Dickinson T.A., Arsenault M.P. Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history. Plant Syst. Evol. 2007, 266:119-145.
11. Cole P., Melton B. Self-and cross-compatibility relationships among genotypes and between ploidy of the rose. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1986, 111:122-125.
12. Crépin F. Sketch of a new Classification of Roses 1889, Spottiswoode & Company, Printers.
13. Cronn R., Wendel J.F. Cryptic trysts, genomic mergers, and plant speciation. New Phytol. 2004, 161:133-142.
14. Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doallo R., Posada D. JModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:772.
15. De Riek J., De Cock K., Smulders M.J.M., Nybom H. AFLP-based population structure analysis as a means to validate the complex taxonomy of dogroses (Rosa section Caninae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 67:547-559.
16. Drummond A.J., Suchard M.A., Xie D., Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1969-1973.
17. Edelman, D.W., 1975. The Eocene Germer Basin Flora of South-Central Idaho [M.S. Thesis], Moscow, University of Idaho, 142pp.
18. Eriksson T., Hibbs M.S., Yoder A.D., Delwiche C.F., Donoghue M.J. The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of chloroplast DNA. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2003, 164:197-211.
19. Erlanson E.W. Phylogeny and polyploidy in Rosa. New Phytol. 1938, 37:72-81.
20. Focke W.O. Neue Beobachtungen über Artenkreuzung und Selbsterilitat. Abh. Natwiss. Ver. Brem. 1897, 14:297-304.
21. Fougère-Danezan M., Joly S., Bruneau A., Gao X.F., Zhang L.B. Phylogeny and biogeography of wild roses with specific attention to polyploids. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115:275-291. 10.1093/aob/mcu245.
22. Gao Y.D., Harris A.J., Zhou S.D., He X.J. Evolutionary events in Lilium (including Nomocharis, Liliaceae) are temporally correlated with orogenies of the Q-T plateau and the Hengduan Mountains. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 68:443-460.
23. Graham, G.G., Primavesi, A.L., 1993. Roses of Great Britain and Ireland. BSBI Handbook, No. 7 Botanical Society of the British Islas, London, p. 208.
24. Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41:95-98.
25. Hewitt G.M. Hybrid zones-natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1988, 3:158-167.
26. Hillis D.M., Moritz C., Porter C.A., Baker R.J. Evidence for biased gene conversion in concerted evolution of ribosomal DNA. Science 1991, 251:308-310.
27. Huson D.H., Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:254-267.
28. Jan C.H., Byrne D.H., Manhart J., Wilson H. Rose germplasm analysis with RAPD markers. HortScience 1999, 34:341-345.
29. Jarvis C. Seventy-two proposals for the conservation of types of selected Linnaean generic names, the report of Subcommittee 3C on the lectotypification of Linnaean generic names. Taxon 1992, 41:552-583.
30. Jesse L.C., Moloney K.A., Obrycki J.J. Insect pollinators of the invasive plant, Rosa multiflora (Rosaceae), in Iowa, USA. Weed Biol. Manage. 2006, 6:235-240.
31. Joly S., Starr J.R., Lewis W.H., Bruneau A. Polyploid and hybrid evolution in roses east of the Rocky Mountains. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93:412-425.
32. Joly S., McLenachan P.A., Lockhart P.J. A statistical approach for distinguishing hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting. Am. Nat. 2009, 174:E54-E70.
33. Kevan P.G., Eisikowitch D., Ambrose J.D., Kemp J.R. Cryptic dioecy and insect pollination in Rosa setigera Michx (Rosaceae), a rare plant of Carolinian Canada. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1990, 40:229-243.
34. Knowles L.L., Carstens B.C. Delimiting species without monophyletic gene trees. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:887-895.
35. Koopman W.J.M., Wissemann V., De Cock K., Van Huylenbroeck J., De Riek J., Sabatlno G.J.H., Visser D., Vosman B., Ritz C.M., Maes B., Werlemark G., Nybom H., Debener T., Linde M., Smulders M.J.M. AFLP markers as a tool to reconstruct complex relationships: a case study in Rosa (Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2008, 95:353-366.
36. Ku T.C. Taxa nova Rosacearum Sinicarum (VI). Bull. Bot. Res. 1990, 10:1-15.
37. Ku T.C., Robertson K.R. Rosa Linnaeus. Flora of China 2003, vol. 9:339-381. Science Press/Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing/St, Louis.
38. Linder C.R., Rieseberg L.H. Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91:1700-1708.
39. Linnaeus, C.V., 1753. Species Plantarum, vols. 2. Salvius, Stockholm.
40. Liu J.Q., Sun Y.S., Ge X.J., Gao L.M., Qiu Y.X. Phylogeographic studies of plants in China: advances in the past and directions in the future. J. Syst. Evol. 2012, 50:267-275.
41. Lo E.Y.Y., Stefanović S., Christensen K.I., Dickinson T.A. Evidence for genetic association between East Asian and western North American Crataegus L. (Rosaceae) and rapid divergence of the eastern North American lineages based on multiple DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 51:157-168.
42. Maddison W.P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:523-536.
43. Maddison W.P., Knowles L.L. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:21-30.
44. Mallet J. Hybrid speciation. Nature 2007, 446:279-283.
45. Matsumoto S., Kouchi M., Yabuki J., Kusunoki M., Ueda Y., Fukui H. Phylogenetic analyses of the genus Rosa using the matK sequence: molecular evidence for the narrow genetic background of modern roses. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 1998, 77:73-82.
46. Matsumoto S., Kouchi M., Fukui H., Ueda Y. Phylogenetic analyses of the subgenus Eurosa using the ITS nrDNA sequence. Acta Hort. 2000, 521:193-202.
47. Matthews J.R. Hybridism and classification in the genus Rosa. New Phytol. 1920, 19:153-171.
48. McNeill, J., Barrie, F.R., Buck, W.R., Demoulin, V., Greuter, D.L., Hawksworth, D.L., Herendeen, P.S., Knapp, S., Marhold, K., Prado, J., Proud'Homme van Reine, W.F., Smith, J.F. Wiersema, J.H. (Eds.), 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (Melbourne Code): Adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress, Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Regnum Vegetable, vol. 154, pp. 1-274.
49. Meng J., Fougere-Danezan M., Zhang L.B., Li D.Z., Yi T.S. Untangling the hybrid origin of the Chinese tea roses: evidence from DNA sequences of single-copy nuclear and chloroplast genes. Plant Syst. Evol. 2011, 297:157-170.
50. Mercure M., Bruneau A. Hybridization between the escaped Rosa rugosa (Rosaceae) and native R. blanda in eastern North America. Am. J. Bot. 2008, 95:597-607.
51. Millan T., Osuna F., Cobos S., Torres A.M., Cubero J.I. Using RAPDs to study phylogenetic relationships in Rosa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1996, 92:273-277.
52. Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W., Schwartz, T., 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 2010. IEEE, pp. 1-8.
53. Müller K. SeqState. Appl. Bioinformatics 2005, 4:65-69.
54. Müller K. Incorporating information from length-mutational events into phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 38:667-676.
55. Abbott R.J. Plant invasions, interspecific hybridization and the evolution of new plant taxa. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1992, 7:401-405.
56. Ohba H., Akiyama S., Mikanagi Y. Interspecific hybrids between the Japanese species in Rosa section Synstylae (Rosaceae). J. Jpn. Bot. 2000, 82:45-53.
57. Paun O., Forest F., Fay M.F., Chase M.W. Hybrid speciation in angiosperms: parental divergence drives ploidy. New Phytol. 2009, 182:507-518.
58. Potter D., Gao F., Bortiri P.E., Oh S.H., Baggett S. Phylogenetic relationships in Rosaceae inferred from chloroplast matK and trnL-trnF nucleotide sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 2002, 231:77-89.
59. Potter D., Eriksson T., Evans R.C., Oh S., Smedmark J.E.E., Morgan D.R., Kerr M., Robertson K.R., Arsenault M., Dickinson T.A., Campbell C.S. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 2007, 266:5-43.
60. Qiu X.Q., Zhang H., Wang Q.G., Jian H.Y., Yan H.J., Zhang T., Wang J.H., Tang K.X. Phylogenetic relationships of wild roses in China based on nrDNA and matK data. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2012, 140:45-51.
61. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2009. Tracer v1.5.http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/.
62. Rehder A. New species, varieties and combinations from the herbarium and collections of the Arnold arboretum. J. Arnold Arbor. 1930, XI:161.
63. Rehder A. Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs Hardy in North America 1940, Macmillan, New York. second ed.
64. Rieseberg L.H. The role of hybridization in evolution - old wine in new skins. Am. J. Bot. 1995, 82:944-953.
65. Rieseberg L.H. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1997, 28:359-389.
66. Rieseberg L.H., Soltis D.E. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol. Trend. Plant 1991, 5:65-84.
67. Ritz C.M., Schmuths H., Wissemann V. Evolution by reticulation: European dogroses originated by multiple hybridization across the genus rosa. J. Hered. 2005, 96:4-14.
68. Roberts A.V., Gladis T., Brumme H. DNA amounts of roses (Rosa L.) and their use in attributing ploidy levels. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28:61-71.
69. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Hohna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3.2: efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:539-542.
70. Scalliet G., Piola F., Douady C.J., Rety S., Raymond O., Baudino S., Bordji K., Bendahmane M., Dumas C., Cock J.M., Hugueney P. Scent evolution in Chinese roses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:5927-5932.
71. Scariot V., Akkak A., Botta R. Characterization and genetic relationships of wild species and old garden roses based on microsatellite analysis. J. Am. Soc. Sci. 2006, 131:66-73.
72. Schanzer I.A., Kutlunina N.A. Interspecific hybridization in wild roses (Rosa L. sect. Caninae DC.). Biol. Bull. 2010, 37:480-488.
73. Schanzer I.A., Vagina A.V. ISSR (Inter Simple Sequence Repeat) markers reveal natural intersectional hybridization in wild roses [Rosa L., sect. Caninae (DC.) Ser. and sect. Cinnamomeae (DC.) Ser.]. Wulfenia 2007, 14:1-14.
74. Seringe, N.C., 1818. Observations générales sur les Roses. In: Musée helvétique d'histoire naturelle, (part Botanique). tome I. Genève: Chez l'auteur, Berne, p. 2.
75. Shaw J., Lickey E.B., Schilling E.E., Small R.L. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94:275-288.
76. Simmons M.P., Ochoterena H. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 2000, 49:369-381.
77. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30:1312-1313.
78. Strand A.E., Leebens-Mack J., Milligan B.G. Nuclear DNA-based markers for plant evolutionary biology. Mol. Ecol. 1997, 6:113-118.
79. Sun Y.S., Abbott R.J., Li L.L., Li L., Zou J.B., Liu J.Q. Evolutionary history of Purple cone spruce (Picea purpurea) in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: homoploid hybrid origin and Pleistocene expansion. Mol. Ecol. 2014, 23:343-359.
80. Swofford, D., 2002. PAUP 4.0 b10: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
81. Taberlet P., Gielly L., Pautou G., Bouvet J. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 17:1105-1109.
82. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22:4673-4680.
83. Thory, C.A., 1820. Prodrome de la monographie des espèces et variétés connues du genre rosier, divisées selon leur ordre naturel. P. Dufart, Paris, p. 128.
84. Timme R.E., Kuehl J.V., Boore J.L., Jansen R.K. A comparative analysis of the Lactuca and Helianthus (Asteraceae) plastid genomes: identification of divergent regions and categorization of shared repeats. Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94:302-312.
85. Tsue-Chih K. Taxa nova Rosacearum Sinicarum (III). Bull. Bot. Res. 1981, 1:1-33.
86. Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore D.M., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M., Webb D.A. Roseaceae to Umbelliferae. Flora Europaea 1978, vol. 2:1-455. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
87. Ueda Y., Akimoto S. Cross-and self-compatibility in various species of the genus Rosa. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2001, 76:392-395.
88. Uggla M., Carlson-Nilsson B.U. Screening of fungal diseases in offspring from crosses between Rosa sections Caninae and Cinnamomeae. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2005, 104:493-504.
89. Wang Y.J., Susanna A., Von Raab-Straube E., Milne R., Liu J.Q. Island-like radiation of Saussurea (Asteraceae: Cardueae) triggered by uplifts of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 97:893-903.
90. Wendel J.F., Doyle J.J. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. Molecular Systematics of Plants 1998, vol. II:265-296. Springer.
91. Wendel J.F., Schnabel A., Seelanan T. Bidirectional interlocus concerted evolution following allopolyploid speciation in cotton (Gossypium). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92:280-284.
92. White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S.J.W.T., Taylor J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications 1990, 315-322. Academic Press Inc., San Diego. M.A. Innis, D.H. Gefland, J.J. Sninsky, T.J. White (Eds.).
93. Whitham T.G., Morrow P.A., Potts B.M. Plant hybrid zones as centers of biodiversity: the herbivore community of two endemic Tasmanian eucalypts. Oecologia 1994, 97:481-490.
94. Whitney K.D., Ahern J.R., Campbell L.G., Albert L.P., King M.S. Patterns of hybridization in plants. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2010, 12:175-182.
95. Wissemann V. Genetic constitution of Rosa sect. Caninae (R. canina, R. jundzillii) and sect. Gallicanae (R. gallica). Angew. Bot. 1999, 73:191-196.
96. Wissemann V. Molecular evidence for allopolyploid orign of the Rosa canina - complex (Rosaceae, Rosoideae). J. Appl. Bot. 2002, 76:176-178.
97. Wissemann V. Classification. Encyclopedia of Rose Science 2003, 111-135. Elsevier, London. A. Roberts, T. Debener, S. Gudin (Eds.).
98. Wissemann V., Hellwig F.H. Reproduction and Hybridisation in the Genus Rosa, Section Caninae (Ser.) Rehd. Rehd. Bot. Acta 1997, 110:251-256.
99. Wissemann V., Ritz C.M. The genus Rosa (Rosoideae, Rosaceae) revisited: molecular analysis of nrITS-1 and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer (IGS) versus conventional taxonomy. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2005, 147:275-290.
100. Wu S.Q., Ueda Y., He H.Y., Nishihara S., Matsumoto S. Phylogenetic analysis of Japanese Rosa species using matK sequences. Breed. Sci. 2000, 50:275-281.
101. Wu S., Ueda Y., Nishihara S., Matsumoto S. Phylogenetic analysis of Japanese Rosa species using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 2001, 76:127-132.
102. Xu B., Wu N., Gao X.F., Zhang L.B. Analysis of DNA sequences of six chloroplast and nuclear genes suggests incongruence, introgression, and incomplete lineage sorting in the evolution of Lespedeza (Fabaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 62:346-358.
103. Yang H.M., Zhang Y.X., Yang J.B., Li D.Z. The monophyly of Chimonocalamus and conflicting gene trees in Arundinarieae (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) inferred from four plastid and two nuclear markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 68:340-356.
104. Yokoya K., Roberts A.V., Mottley J., Lewis R., Brandham P.E. Nuclear DNA amounts in roses. Ann. Bot. 2000, 85:557-561.
105. Yü T.T., Lu L.T., Ku T.C. Taxa nova Rosacearum Xizangensium. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 1980, 18:490-503.
106. Yü T.T., Lu L.T., Ku T.C., Kuan K.C., Li C.L. Rosaceae (2). Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae 1985, vol. 37:1-516. Science Press, Beijing.
107. Zou X.H., Ge S. Conflicting gene trees and phylogenomics. J. Syst. Evol. 2008, 46:795-807.