Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): Limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 266, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 119-145

  Campbell, C S ^a   Evans, R C ^b   Morgan, D R ^c   Dickinson, T A ^d   Arsenault, M P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^b ACADIA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA   (United States)

^d DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ancient radiation; cpDNA; GBSSI; Gene duplication; Hybridization; Pyreae; Pyrodae; Rapid

Indexed keywords

MALOIDEAE; ROSACEAE; ROSOIDEAE;

EID: 34547814274     PISSN: 03782697     EISSN: 16156110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-007-0545-y     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (74)

1. Aldasoro J. J., Aedo C. and Navarro C. (2005). Phylogenetic and phytogeographical relationships in Maloideae (Rosaceae) based on morphological and anatomical characters. Blumea 50: 3-15
2. Campbell C. S., Baldwin B. G., Donoghue M. J. and Wojciechowski M. F. (1995). A phylogeny of the genera of Maloideae (Rosaceae): Evidence from Internal Transcribed Spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences and congruence with morphology. Amer. J. Bot. 82: 903-918
3. Challice J. (1973). Phenolic compounds of the subfamily Pomoideae: A chemotaxonomic survey. Phytochemistry 12: 1095-1101
4. Challice J. S. (1974). Rosaceae chemotaxonomy and the origins of the Pomoideae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 239-259
5. Challice J. and Kovanda M. (1978). Flavonoids as markers of taxonomic relationships in the genus Sorbus in Europe. Preslia 50: 305-320
6. Chevreau E., Lespinasse Y. and Gallet M. (1985). Inheritance of pollen enzymes and polyploid origin of apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 268-277
7. Donoghue M. J. and Sanderson M. J. (1992). The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. In: Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. and Doyle, J. J. (eds) Molecular systematics of plants, pp 340-368. Chapman and Hall, New York
8. Doyle J. J. and Doyle J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15
9. Evans R. C. (1999) Molecular, morphological, and ontogenetic evaluation of relationships and evolution in Rosaceae. Ph.D. thesis, Botany Department, University of Toronto.
10. Evans R. C., Alice L. A., Campbell C. S., Kellogg E. A. and Dickinson T. A. (2000). The granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene in Rosaceae: multiple putative loci and phylogenetic utility. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 17: 388-400
11. Evans R. C. and Campbell C. S. (2002). The origin of the apple subfamily (Rosaceae: Maloideae) is clarified by DNA sequence data from duplicated GBSSI Genes. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1478-1484
12. Evans R. C. and Dickinson T. A. (1999). Floral ontogeny and morphology in subfamily Spiraeoideae Endl. (Rosaceae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 160: 981-1012
13. Evans R. C. and Dickinson T. A. (2005). Floral ontogeny and morphology in Gillenia (''Spiraeoideae'') and subfamily Maloideae C. Weber (Rosaceae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 166: 427-447
14. Farr D. F. (1989). Fungi on plants and plant products in the United States. APS Press, St. Paul, Minn
15. Farr D. F., Rossman A. Y., Palm M. E., McCray E. B. (2005) Fungal databases, Systematic Botany & Mycology Laboratory. Agricultural Research Service, United States Dept. of Agriculture.
16. Felsenstein J. (1978). Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27: 401-410
17. Felsenstein J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791
18. Fiala K. I. and Sokal R. R. (1985). Factors determining the accuracy of cladogram estimation: evaluation using computer simulation. Evolution 39: 609-622
19. Fishbein M., Hibsch-Jetter C., Soltis D. E. and Hufford L. (2001). Phylogeny of Saxifragales (angiosperms, eudicots): analysis of a rapid, ancient radiation. Syst. Biol. 50: 817-847
20. Fishbein M. and Soltis D. E. (2004). Further resolution of the rapid radiation in Saxifragales (angiosperms, eudicots) supported by mixed-model Bayesian analysis. Syst. Bot. 29: 883-891
21. Godron D. A. (1874). De l'hybridité dans le genre Sorbier. Rev. Sci. Nat. 4: 443-447
22. Graham S. (1997) Phylogenetic analyses of breeding-system evolution in heterostylous monocotyledons. Ph.D. thesis, Botany Department, University of Toronto.
23. Hasegawa M., Kishino H. and Yano T. (1985). Dating of the human-ape split by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Molec. Evol. 21: 160-174
24. Huelsenbeck J. P. (1995). Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44: 17-48
25. Hutchinson J. (1964). The genera of flowering plants, vol. 1, Dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford
26. Ishikawa S., Kato S., Imakawa S., Mikami T. and Shimamoto Y. (1992). Organelle DNA polymorphisms in cultivated apple and rootstocks. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 963-967
27. Jones G. N. (1946). American species of Amelanchier. Urbana, Illinois
28. Kalkman C. (1973). The Malesian species of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Blumea 21: 413-442
29. Kalkman C. (2004). Rosaceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) The families and genera of vascular plants, pp 343-386. Springer, Berlin
30. Kovanda M. (1965). On the generic limits in the Maloideae. Preslia 37: 27-34
31. Liljefors A. (1934). Uber normale und apospore Embryosackentwicklung in der Gattung Sorbus, nebst einigen Bemerkungen uber die Chromosomenzahlen. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 28: 290-299
32. Liljefors A. (1953). Studies on propagation, embryology and pollination in Sorbus. Acta Horti Berg. 16: 277-329
33. Linder C. R. and Rieseberg L. H. (2004). Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 1700-1708
34. Lo E., Stefanovic S., Dickinson T. A., in press. Crataegus and Mespilus (Pyreae, Rosaceae) - two genera or one? Syst. Bot.
35. McDade L. A. (1995). Hybridization and phylogenetics. In: Hoch, P. C. and Stephenson, A. G. (eds) Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics, pp 305-331. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis
36. Morgan D. R., Soltis D. E. and Robertson K. R. (1994). Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 890-903
37. Nelson-Jones E. B., Briggs D. and Smith A. G. (2002). The origin of intermediate species of the genus Sorbus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 953-963
38. Oddou-Muratorio S., Petit R. J., Guerroue B. L., Guesnet D. and Demesure B. (2001). Pollen- versus seed-mediated gene flow in a scattered forest tree species. Evolution 55: 1123-1135
39. Petit R. J., Pineau E., Demesure B., Bacillieri R., Ducousso A., Kremer A. (1997) Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94.
40. Phipps J. B., Robertson K. R., Rohrer J. R. and Smith P. G. (1991). Origins and evolution of subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 16: 303-332
41. Posada D. and Crandall K. A. (1998). Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818
42. Potter D., Eriksson T., Evans R. C., Oh S.-H., Smedmark J., Morgan D., Kerr M., Robertson K. R., Arsenault M., Dickinson T. A., Campbell C. S., In press. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 266: 5-43.
43. Rambaut A. (2002). Se-Al: sequence alignment editor. University of Oxford, Oxford, England
44. Raspé O. A., Jacquemart L. and De Sloover J. (1998). Isozymes in Sorbus aucuparia (Rosaceae: Maloideae): genetic analysis and evolutionary significance of zymograms. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 159: 627-636
45. Raspé O. and Kohn J. R. (2002). S-allele diversity in Sorbus aucuparia and Crataegus monogyna (Rosaceae: Maloideae). Heredity 88: 458-465
46. Rieseberg L. H. and Soltis D. E. (1991). Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol. Trends Pl. 5: 65-84
47. Robertson K. R., Phipps J. B., Rohrer J. R. and Smith P. G. (1991). A synopsis of genera of the Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 16: 376-394
48. Roemer M. J. (1847) Familiarum naturalium regni vegetabilis synopses monographicae. III. Rosi-florae. Amygdalacearum et Pomacearum. Weimar, Landes-Industrie-Comptoir.
49. Rohrer J. R., Robertson K. R. and Phipps J. B. (1991). Variation in structure among fruits of Maloideae (Rosaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1617-1635
50. Rohrer J. R., Robertson K. R. and Phipps J. B. (1994). Floral morphology of Maloideae (Rosaceae) and its systematic relevance. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 574-581
51. Rokas A., Kruger D. and Carroll S. B. (2005). Animal evolution and molecular signature of radiation compressed in time. Science 310: 1933-1938
52. Ronquist F. and Huelsenbeck J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574
53. Sang T. (2002). Utility of low-copy nuclear gene sequences in plant phylogenetics. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Molec. Biol. 37: 121-147
54. Savile D. B. O. (1979). Fungi as aids in higher plant classification. Bot. Rev. 45: 380-495
55. Sax K. (1931). The origin and relationships of the Pomoideae. J. Arnold Arbor. 12: 3-22
56. Sax K. (1932). Chromosome relationships in the Pomoideae. J. Arnold Arbor. 13: 363-367
57. Sax K. (1933). The origin of the Pomoideae. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 30: 147-150
58. Simmmons M. P. and Ochoterena H. (2000). Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381
59. Spjut R. W. (1994). A systematic treatment of fruit types. Bronx, New York
60. Sterling C. (1964). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. III. Pomoideae: Crataegus, Hesperomeles, Mespilus, Osteomeles. Amer. J. Bot. 51: 705-712
61. Sterling C. (1965a). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. IV. Pomoideae: Chamaemeles, Cotoneaster, Dichotomanthes, Pyracantha. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 47-54
62. Sterling C. (1965b). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. V. Pomoideae: Amelanchier, Aronia, Malacomeles, Malus, Peraphyllum, Pyrus, Sorbus. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 418-426
63. Sterling C. (1965c). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. VI. Pomoideae: Eriobotrya, Heteromeles, Photinia, Pourthiaea, Raphiolepis, Stranvaesia. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 938-946
64. Sterling C. (1966). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. VII. Pomoideae: Chaenomeles, Cydonia, Docynia. Amer. J. Bot. 53: 225-231
65. Swofford D. L. (2001). PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA
66. Talent N. and Dickinson T. A. (2005). Polyploidy in Crataegus and Mespilus (Rosaceae, Maloideae): evolutionary inferences from flow cytometry of nuclear DNA amounts. Canad. J. Bot. 83: 1268-1304
67. Vidal J. E. (1965). Notes sur quelques Rosacées Asiatique (II) (Photinia, Stranvaesia). Adansonia 5: 221-237
68. Weeden N. and Lamb R. (1987). Genetics and linkage analysis of 19 isozyne loci in apple. J. Amer. Hort. Soc. 112: 865-872
69. Wilson M. A., Grant B. and Clegg M. T. (1990). Chloroplast DNA evolves slowly in the palm family (Arecaceae). Molec. Biol. Evol. 7: 303-314
70. Wolfe J. A. and Wehr W. (1988). Rosaceous Chamaebatiaria-like foliage from the Paleogene of western North America. Aliso 12: 177-200
71. Yang Z. (1994a). Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. J. Molec. Evol. 39: 294-307
72. Yang Z. (1994b). Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. Molec. Evol. 39: 105-111
73. Zhang L. Q., Pond S. K. and Gaut B. S. (2001). A survey of the molecular evolutionary dynamics of twenty-five multigene families from four grass taxa. J. Molec. Evol. 52: 144-156
74. Zhang S.-Y. (1992). Wood anatomy of the Rosaceae. Rijksherbarium/Hortus Botanicus, Leiden