AFLP markers as a tool to reconstruct complex relationships: A case study in Rosa (Rosaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 353-366

  Koopman, Wim J M ^a,h   Wissemann, Volker ^b   De Cock, Katrien ^c   Van Huylenbroeck, Johan ^c   De Riek, Jan ^c   Sabatino, Gerda J H ^a   Visser, Dirk ^a   Vosman, Ben ^a   Ritz, Christiane M ^d   Maes, Bert ^e   Werlemark, Gun ^f   Nybom, Hilde ^f   Debener, Thomas ^g   Linde, Marcus ^g   Smulders, Marinus J M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

^d FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^e Ecologisch Adviesbureau Maes   (Netherlands)

^f SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^g LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^h Koopman Scientific Services   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP); Bayesian inference; Parsimony; Phylogeny; Rosa; Rosaceae; Roses; UPGMA

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; COMPLEXITY; EVOLUTION; HYBRIDIZATION; MORPHOLOGY; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS;

CANIDAE; ROSA; ROSACEAE;

EID: 41149149173     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.95.3.353     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. ALFARO, M. E., S. ZOLLER, AND F. LUTZONI. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 255-266.
2. ARENS, P., H. COOPS, J. JANSEN, AND B. VOSMAN. 1998. Molecular genetic analysis of black poplar (Populus nigra L.) along Dutch rivers. Molecular Ecology 7: 11-18.
3. BAGLEY, M. J., S. L. ANDERSON, AND B. MAY. 2001. Choice of methodology for assessing genetic impacts of environmental stressors: polymorphism and reproducibility of RAPD and AFLP fingerprints. Ecotoxicology (London, England) 10: 239-244.
4. BROUAT, C., D. MCKEY, AND E. J. P. DOUZERY. 2004. Differentiation in a geographical mosaic of plants coevolving with ants: phylogeny of the Leonardoxa africana complex (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Molecular Ecology 13: 1157-1171.
5. BRUNEAU, A., S. JOLY, J. R. STARR, AND J.-N. DROUIN. 2005. Molecular markers indicate that the narrow Québec endemics Rosa rousseauiorum and Rosa williamsii are synonymous with the widespread Rosa blanda. Canadian Journal of Botany 83: 386-398.
6. BRUNEAU, A., J. R. STARR, AND S. JOLY. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Rosa: new evidence from chloroplast DNA sequences and an appraisal of current knowledge. Systematic Botany 32: 366-378.
7. CREGAN, P. B. 1992. Simple sequence repeat DNA length polymorphisms. Probe 2: 18-22.
8. DEÁK, T., G. FACSAR, AND G. D. BISZTRAY. 2005. Genetic polymorphism of Rosa genotypes native to Hungary. Acta Horticulturae 690: 57-62.
9. DEBENER, T., C. BARTELS, AND L. MATTIESCH. 1996. RAPD analysis of genetic variation between a group of rose cultivars and selected wild rose species. Molecular Breeding 2: 321-327.
10. ERIKSSON, T., M. S. HIBBS, A. D. YODER, C. F. DELWICHE, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2003. The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of chloroplast DNA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 197-211.
11. ERIXON, P., B. SVENNBLAD, T. BRITTON, AND B. OXELMAN. 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 52: 665-673.
12. ESSELINK, G. D., M. J. M. SMULDERS, AND B. VOSMAN. 2003. Identification of cut rose (Rosa hybrida) and rootstock varieties using robust sequence tagged microsatellite site markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 277-286.
13. FARRIS, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
14. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17: 368-376.
15. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 39: 783-791.
16. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity 83: 189-195.
17. HILLIS, D. M., C. MORITZ, AND B. K. MABLE. 1996. Applications of molecular systematics. In D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable [eds.], Molecular Systematics, 515-543. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
18. HÖRANDL, E. 2006. Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa-evolutionary versus cladistic classifications. Taxon 55: 564-570.
19. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 17: 754-755.
20. JAN, C. H., D. H. BYRNE, J. MANHART, AND H. WILSON. 1999. Rose germplasm analysis with RAPD markers. HortScience 34: 341-345.
21. JOLY, S., AND A. BRUNEAU. 2006. Incorporating allelic variation for reconstructing the evolutionary history of organisms from multiple genes: An example from Rosa in North America. Systematic Biology 55: 623-636.
22. JOLY, S., AND A. BRUNEAU. 2007. Delimiting species boundaries in Rosa sect. Cinnamomeae (Rosaceae) in eastern North America. Systematic Botany 32: 819-836.
23. JOLY, S., J. R. STARR, W. H. LEWIS, AND A. BRUNEAU. 2006. Polyploid and hybrid evolution in roses east of the Rocky Mountains. American Journal of Botany 93: 412-425.
24. JONES, C. J., K. J. EDWARDS, S. CASTAGLIONE, M. O. WINFIELD, F. SALA, C. VAN DE WIEL, G. BREDEMEIJER, B. VOSMAN, M. MATTHES, A. DALY, R. BRETTSCHNEIDER, P. BETTINI, M. BUIATTI, E. MAESTRI, A. MALCEVSCHI, N. MARMIROLI, R. AERT, G. VOLCKAERT, J. RUEDA, R. LINACERO, A. VAZQUEZ, AND A. KARP. 1997. Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Molecular Breeding 3: 381-390.
25. KARDOLUS, J. P., H. J. VAN ECK, AND R. G. VAN DEN BERG. 1998. The potential of AFLPs in biosystematics: A first application in Solanum taxonomy (Solanaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 210: 87-103.
26. KLUGE, A. G., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18: 1-32.
27. KOOPMAN, W. J. M. 2005. Phylogenetic signal in AFLP data sets. Systematic Biology 54: 197-217.
28. KOOPMAN, W. J. M., M. J. ZEVENBERGEN, AND R. G. VAN DEN BERG. 2001. Species relationships in Lactuca s.l. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints. American Journal of Botany 88: 1881-1887.
29. LEACHÉ, A. D., AND T. W. REEDER. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Systematic Biology 51: 44-68.
30. LEUS, L., F. JEANNETEAU, J. VAN HUYLENBROECK, E. VAN BOCKSTAELE, AND J. DE RIEK. 2004. Molecular evaluation of a collection of rose species and cultivars by AFLP, ITS, rbcL, and matK. Acta Horticulturae 651: 141-147.
31. LEWIS, P. O., M. T. HOLDER, AND K. E. HOLSINGER. 2005. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology 54: 241-253.
32. LUO, R., A. L. HIPP, AND B. LARGET. 2007. A Bayesian model of AFLP marker evolution and phylogenetic inference. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology (1): article 11.
33. MACE, E. S., C. G. GEBHARDT, AND R. N. LESTER. 1999a. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships in the tribe Datureae (Solanaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 634-641.
34. MACE, E. S., R. N. LESTER, AND C. G. GEBHARDT. 1999b. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among the cultivated eggplant, Solanum melongena L., and wild relatives (Solanaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 626-633.
35. MATSUMOTO, S., M. KOUCHI, H. FUKUI, AND Y. UEDA. 2000. Phylogenetic analyses of the subgenus Eurosa using the ITS nrDNA sequence. Acta Horticulturae 521: 193-202.
36. MATSUMOTO, S., M. KOUCHI, J. YABUKI, M. KUSUNOKI, Y. UEDA, AND H. FUKUI. 1998. Phylogenetic analyses of the genus Rosa using the matK sequence: molecular evidence for the narrow genetic background of modern roses. Scientia Horticulturae 77: 73-82.
37. MATSUMOTO, S., H. WAKITA, AND H. FUKUI. 1997. Molecular classification of wild roses using organelle DNA probes. Scientia Horticulturae 68: 191-196.
38. MAYR, E., AND W. J. BOCK. 2002. Classifications and other ordering systems. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 40: 169-194.
39. MILLAN, T., F. OSUNA, S. COBOS, A. M. TORRES, AND J. I. CUBERO. 1996. Using RAPDs to study phylogenetic relationships in Rosa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 273-277.
40. MUELLER, U. G., AND L. L. WOLFENBARGER. 1999. AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14: 389-394.
41. NEI, M., AND W.-H. LI. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 76: 5269-5273.
42. NYBOM, H. 2004. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molecular Ecology 13: 1143-1155.
43. NYBOM, H., G. D. ESSELINK, G. WERLEMARK, L. LEUS, AND B. VOSMAN. 2006. Unique genomic configuration revealed by microsatellite DNA in polymorphic dogroses, Rosa sect. Caninae. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 635-648.
44. OLSSON, Å., H. NYBOM, AND H. C. PRENTICE. 2000. Relationships between Nordic dogroses (Rosa L. sect. Caninae, Rosaceae) assessed by RAPDs and elliptic fourier analysis of leaflet shape. Systematic Botany 25: 511-521.
45. PAGE, R. D. M., AND E. C. HOLMES. 1998. Molecular evolution: A phylogenetic approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
46. REHDER, A. 1940. Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs. MacMillan, New York, New York, USA.
47. RITZ, C. M., H. SCHMUTHS, AND V. WISSEMANN. 2005. Evolution by reticulation: European dogroses originated by multiple hybridization across the genus Rosa. Journal of Heredity 96: 4-14.
48. ROHLF, F. J. 1993. NTSYS-pc, numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Applied Biostatistics, Setauket, New York, USA.
49. RONQUIST, F., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19: 1572-1574.
50. RONQUIST, F., J. P. HUELSENBECK, AND P. VAN DER MARK. 2005. MrBayes 3.1 Manual, draft 5/26/2005. School of Computational Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
51. SAITOU, N., AND M. NEI. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406-425.
52. SCARIOT, V., A. AKKAK, AND R. BOTTA. 2006. Characterization and genetic relationships of wild species and old garden roses based on microsatellite analysis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 131: 66-73.
53. SMULDERS, M. J. M., J. VAN DER SCHOOT, R. H. E. M. GEERTS, A. G. ANTONISSE-DE JONG, H. KOREVAAR, A. VAN DER WERF, AND B. VOSMAN. 2000. Genetic diversity and the reintroduction of meadow species. Plant Biology 2: 447-454.
54. SOSEF, M. S. M. 1997. Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon 46: 75-85.
55. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1999. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10 (Altivec). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
56. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND D. P. BEGLE. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. User's manual. Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, Washington D.C., USA.
57. TÄCKHOLM, G. 1920. On the cytology of the genus Rosa. A preliminary note. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 14: 300-311.
58. TAKEUCHI, S., K. NOMURA, H. UCHIYAMA, AND K. YONEDA. 2000. Phylogenetic relationship in the genus Rosa based on the restriction enzyme analysis of the chloroplast DNA. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 69: 598-604.
59. UEDA, Y., AND H. TOMITA. 1989. Morphometric analysis of pollen exine patterns in roses. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 58: 211-220.
60. VAN DE PEER, Y., AND R. DE WACHTER. 1994. TREECON for Windows: A software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 10: 569-570.
61. VOS, P., R. HOGERS, M. BLEEKER, M. REIJANS, T. VAN DE LEE, M. HORNES, A. FRIJTERS, J. POT, J. PELEMAN, M. KUIPER, AND M. ZABEAU. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407-4414.
62. VRIESENDORP, B. 2007. Phylogenetworks: Exploring reticulate evolution and its consequences for phylogenetic reconstruction. Ph.D. dissertation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
63. VRIESENDORP, B., AND F. T. BAKKER. 2005. Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in angiosperms: what can we do? Taxon 54: 593-604.
64. WEN, X. P., X. M. PANG, AND X. X. DENG. 2004. Characterization of genetic relationships of Rosa roxburghii Tratt and its relatives using morphological traits, RAPD and AFLP markers. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 79: 189-196.
65. WHITTINGHAM, L. A., B. SLIKAS, D. W. WINKLER, AND F. H. SHELDON. 2002. Phylogeny of the tree swallow genus, Tachycineta (Aves: Hirundinidae), by Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 430-441.
66. WILCOX, T. P., D. J. ZWICKL, T. A. HEATH, AND D. M. HILLIS. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 361-371.
67. WISSEMANN, V. 1999. Genetic constitution of Rosa sect. Caninae (R. canina, R. jundzillii) and sect. Gallicanae (R. gallica). Journal of Applied Botany 73: 191-196.
68. WISSEMANN, V. 2000. Epicuticular wax morphology and the taxonomy of Rosa (section Caninae, subsection Rubiginosae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 221: 107-112.
69. WISSEMANN, V. 2002. Molecular evidence for allopolyploid origin of the Rosa canina-complex (Rosaceae, Rosoideae). Journal of Applied Botany 76: 176-178.
70. WISSEMANN, V. 2003. Conventional taxonomy of wild roses. In A. Roberts, T. Debener and S. Gudin [eds.], Encyclopedia of rose science, 111-117. Elsevier, London, UK.
71. WISSEMANN, V., AND C. M. RITZ. 2005. The genus Rosa (Rosoideae, Rosaceae) revisited: molecular analysis of nrITS-1 and atp B-rbcL intergenic spacer (IGS) versus conventional taxonomy. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 147: 275-290.
72. WU, S., S. NISHIHARA, AND Y. UEDA. 2001a. Phylogenetic analysis of section Synstylae in the genus Rosa based on RAPD markers. Acta Horticulturae 547: 391-402.
73. WU, S. Q., Y. UEDA, H. HE, S. NISHIHARA, AND S. MATSUMOTO. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of Japanese Rosa species using matK sequences. Breeding Science 50: 275-281.
74. WU, S., Y. UEDA, S. NISHIHARA, AND S. MATSUMOTO. 2001b. Phylogenetic analysis of Japanese Rosa species using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS). The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 76: 127-132.
75. WYLIE, A. P. 1954. The history of garden roses, part I. Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society, London 79: 555-571.
76. YAN, Z., C. DENNEBOOM, A. HATTENDORF, O. DOLSTRA, T. DEBENER, P. STAM, AND P. B. VISSER. 2005. Construction of an integrated map of rose with AFLP, SSR, PK, RGA, RFLP, SCAR and morphological markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110: 766-777.
77. YANG, Z., AND B. RANNALA. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 717-724.