AFLP-based population structure analysis as a means to validate the complex taxonomy of dogroses (Rosa section Caninae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 547-559

  De Riek, Jan ^a   De Cock, Katrien ^a   Smulders, Marinus J M ^b   Nybom, Hilde ^c  

^a INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

DNA markers; Dogroses; Hybridisation; Population genetics; Speciation; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENE; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROSE;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROSA;

CANIDAE; ROSA; ROSA MICRANTHA; ROSA RUBIGINOSA; ROSA STYLOSA;

EID: 84875521619     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bruneau A., Joly S., Starr J.R., Drouin J.N. Molecular markers indicate that the narrow Québec endemics Rosa rousseauiorum and Rosa williamsii are synonymous with the widespread Rosa blanda. Can. J. Bot. 2005, 83:386-398.
2. De Cock, K, 2008. Genetic diversity of wild roses (Rosa spp.) in Europe, with an in-depth morphological study of Flemish populations. PhD thesis. Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium.
3. De Cock K., Vander Mijnsbrugge K., Breyne P., Nybom H., Smulders M.J.M., Van Slycken J., De Riek J. The diversity of autochthonous roses in Flanders (Belgium) in view of the European GENEROSE reference framework. Acta Hort 2007, 760:621-628.
4. De Cock K., Van Der Mijnsbrugge K., Breyne P., Van Bockstaele E., Van Slycken J. Morphological and AFLP-based differentiation within the taxonomical complex section Caninae (subgenus Rosa). Ann. Bot. 2008, 102:685-697.
5. De Riek J., Calsyn E., Everaert I., Van Bockstaele E., De Loose M. AFLP based alternatives for the assessment of distinctness, uniformity and stability of sugar beet varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001, 103:1254-1265.
6. De Riek J., Everaert I., Esselink D., Calsyn E., Smulders M.J.M., Vosman B. Assignment tests for variety identification compared to genetic similarity-based methods using experimental datasets from different marker systems in sugar beet. Crop Sci. 2007, 47:1964-1974.
7. Excoffier L., Laval G., Schneider S. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinformatics Online 2005, 1:47-50.
8. Felsenstein, J, 2005. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
9. Graham, G.G., Primavesi, A.L., 1993. Rose of Great Britain and Ireland. B.S.B.I. Handbook No. 7 Botanical Society of the British Islas, London, p. 208. ISBN: 0901158224.
10. Henker H. Hegi illustrierte flora van mitteleuropa. Parey Buchverlag Berlin 2000, 2000:1-108.
11. Jacobs M.M.J., Smulders M.J.M., Van den Berg R.G., Vosman B. What is in a name: genetic structure in Solanum section Petota studied using population-genetic tools. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11:42.
12. Jan C.H., Byrne D.H., Manhart J., Wilson H. Rose germplasm analysis with RAPD markers. HortScience 1999, 34:341-345.
13. Khaitová L., Werlemark G., Nybom H., Kovařík A. Frequent silencing of rDNA loci on the univalent-forming genomes contrasts with their stable expression on the bivalent-forming genomes in polyploid dogroses (Rosa section Caninae). Heredity 2010, 104:113-120.
14. Koopman W.J.M., Vosman B., Sabatino G.J.H., Visser D., Van Huylenbroeck J., De Riek J., De Cock K., Wissemann V., Ritz C.M., Maes B., Werlemark G., Nybom H., Debener T., Linde M., Smulders M.J.M. AFLP markers as a tool to reconstruct complex relationships in the genus Rosa (Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2008, 95:353-366.
15. Kovařík A., Werlemark G., Leitch A.R., Souckova-Skalicka K., Lim K.Y., Khaitová L., Koukalova B., Nybom H. The asymmetric meiosis in pentaploid dogroses (Rosa section Caninae) is associated with a skewed distribution of rRNA gene families in the gametes. Heredity 2008, 101:359-367.
16. Kurtto, A., Lampinen, R., Junikka, L. (Eds.), 2004. Atlas Florae Europaeae. Distribution of vascular plants in Europe. 13. Rosaceae (Spiraea to Fragaria, excl. Rubus). The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Helsinki. p. 320.
17. Lim K.Y., Werlemark G., Matyasek R., Bringloe J.B., Sieber V., El Mokadem H., Meynet J., Hemming J., Leitch A.R., Roberts A.V. Evolutionary implications of permanent odd polyploidy in the stable sexual, pentaploid of Rosa canina L. Heredity 2005, 94:501-506.
18. Matsumoto S., Kouchi M., Fukui H., Ueda Y. Phylogenetic analyses of the subgenus Eurosa using the ITS nrDNA sequence. Acta Hort 2000, 521:193-202.
19. Nilsson Ö. Drawings of Scandinavian plants 1-8 Rosa L. Bot. Notiser 1967, 120:1-408.
20. Nybom H., Esselink G.D., Werlemark G., Vosman B. Microsatellite DNA marker inheritance indicates preferential pairing between highly homologous genomes in polyploid and hemisexual dog-roses Rosa L. section Caninae). Heredity 2004, 92:139-150.
21. Nybom H., Esselink G.D., Werlemark G., Leus L., Vosman B. Unique genomic configuration revealed by microsatellite DNA in polyploid dogroses, Rosa section Caninae. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:635-648.
22. Olsson Å.M.E., Nybom H., Prentice H.C. Relationships between Nordic dogroses (Rosa L. section Caninae, Rosaceae) assessed by RAPDs and elliptic Fourier analysis of leaflet shape. Syst. Bot. 2000, 25:511-521.
23. Olsson Å., Prentice H.C. Morphometric diversity and geographic differentiation in six dogrose taxa (Rosa Sect. Caninae, Rosaceae) from the Nordic countries. Nord. J. Bot. 2001, 21:225-241.
24. Paetkau D., Waits L.P., Clarkson P.L., Craighead L., Strobeck C. An empirical evaluation of genetic distance statistics using microsatellite data from bear (Ursidae) populations. Genetics 1997, 147:1943-1957.
25. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155:945-959.
26. Rehder A. Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs 1940, Macmillan, New York.
27. Ritz C.M., Wissemann V. Male correlated non-matroclinal character inheritance in reciprocal hybrids of Rosa section Caninae (DC.) Ser. (Rosaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 2003, 241:213-221.
28. Ritz C.M., Wissemann V. Microsatellite analyses of artificial and spontaneous dogrose hybrids reveal the hybridogenic origin of Rosa micrantha by the contribution of unreduced gametes. J. Hered. 2011, 102:217-227.
29. Ritz C.M., Schmuthz H., Wissemann V. Evolution by reticulation: European dogroses originated by multiple hybridization across the genus Rosa. J. Hered. 2005, 96:4-14.
30. Scariot V., Akkak A., Botta R. Characterization and genetic relationships of wild species and old garden roses based on microsatellite analysis. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2006, 13:66-73.
31. Täckholm G. Zytologische studien uber die gattung Rosa. Acta Hort. Berg. 1922, 7:97-381.
32. Van Huylenbroeck J., Smulders M.J.M., Debener T., Nybom H., Gudin S., Cox P., Crespel L., De Riek J. GENEROSE: genetic evaluation of European rose resources for conservation and horticultural use. Acta Hort. 2005, 690:119-123.
33. Vander Mijnsbrugge K., De Cock K., Cox K., Breyne P. Conservation measures for Rosa arvensis Huds. in Flanders (Belgium) based on congruent genetic and phenotypic population differentiation. Conserv. Genet. 2010, 11:2243-2253.
34. Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., van de Lee T., Hornes M., Frijters A., Pot J., Peleman J., Kuiper M., Zabeau M. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23:4407-4414.
35. Werlemark G. Evidence of apomixis in hemisexual dogrose species, Rosa sect Caninae. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2000, 12:353-359.
36. Werlemark G., Nybom H. Skewed distribution of morphological character scores and molecular markers in three interspecific crosses in Rosa section Caninae. Hereditas 2001, 134:1-13.
37. Wissemann V. Genetic constitution of Rosa section Caninae (R. canina, R. jundzillii) and section Gallicanae (R. gallica). J. Appl. Bot. 1999, 73:191-196.
38. Wissemann V. Epicuticular wax morphology and the taxonomy of Rosa (section Caninae, subsection Rubiginosae). Plant Syst. Evol. 2000, 221:107-112.
39. Wissemann V. Molecular evidence for allopolyploid origin of the Rosa canina-complex (Rosaceae, Rosoideae). J. Appl. Bot. 2002, 76:176-178.
40. Wissemann, V., 2003. Conventional taxonomy (wild roses). In: Roberts, A.V, Debener, T., Gudin, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Rose Science, Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford. p. 111-117.
41. Wissemann V., Ritz C.M. The genus Rosa (Rosoideae, Rosaceae) revisited: molecular analysis of nrITS-1 and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer (IGS) versus conventional taxonomy. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2005, 147:275-290.
42. Wissemann V., Ritz C.M. Evolutionary patterns and processes in the genus Rosa (Rosaceae) and their implications for host-parasite co-evolution. Plant. Syst. Evol. 2007, 266:79-89.
43. Zhang, J., Esselink, G.D., Che, D., Fougère-Danezan, M., Arens, P., Smulders, M.J.M., The diploid origins of allopolyploid rose species studied using single nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes flanking a microsatellite repeat. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 88, 2013, 85-92.
44. Zündorf H.-J., Günther K.-F., Korsch H., Westhus W. Flora von Thüringen 2006, Weissdorn Verlag, Jena.