Bioinformatics analysis identifies several intrinsically disordered human E3 ubiquitin-protein ligases

PeerJ

Volumn 2016, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Boomsma, Wouter ^a   Nielsen, Sofie V ^a   Lindorff Larsen, Kresten ^a   Hartmann Petersen, Rasmus ^a   Ellgaard, Lars ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

E3 ligase; Hrd1; Intrinsic disorder; Protein degradation; Protein folding; Quality control; San1; STUbL; Ubiquitin

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; HRD1 PROTEIN; LYSINE; SAN1 PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84963961516     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21678359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1725     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25:3389-3402 DOI 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.
2. Arndt V, Rogon C, Hohfeld J. 2007. To be, or not to be-molecular chaperones in protein degradation. Cellular and Molecular Life Science 64:2525-2541 DOI 10.1007/s00018-007-7188-6.
3. Babu MM, Kriwacki RW, Pappu RV. 2012. Structural biology. Versatility from protein disorder. Science 337:1460-1461 DOI 10.1126/science.1228775.
4. Bhowmick P, Pancsa R, Guharoy M, Tompa P. 2013. Functional diversity and structural disorder in the human ubiquitination pathway. PLoS ONE 8:e65443 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065443.
5. Brown CJ, Johnson AK, Daughdrill GW. 2010. Comparing models of evolution for ordered and disordered proteins. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27:609-621 DOI 10.1093/molbev/msp277.
6. Brown CJ, Johnson AK, Dunker AK, Daughdrill GW. 2011. Evolution and disorder. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 21:441-446 DOI 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.02.005.
7. Budhidarmo R, Nakatani Y, Day CL. 2012. RINGs hold the key to ubiquitin transfer. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 37:58-65 DOI 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.11.001.
8. Chen JW, Romero P, Uversky VN, Dunker AK. 2006a. Conservation of intrinsic disorder in protein domains and families: I. A database of conserved predicted disordered regions. Journal of Proteome Research 5:879-887 DOI 10.1021/pr060048x.
9. Chen JW, Romero P, Uversky VN, Dunker AK. 2006b. Conservation of intrinsic disorder in protein domains and families: II. functions of conserved disorder. Journal of Proteome Research 5:888-898 DOI 10.1021/pr060049p.
10. Christianson JC, Ye Y. 2014. Cleaning up in the endoplasmic reticulum: ubiquitin in charge. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 21:325-335 DOI 10.1038/nsmb.2793.
11. Cumberworth A, Lamour G, Babu MM, Gsponer J. 2013. Promiscuity as a functional trait: intrinsically disordered regions as central players of interactomes. Biochemical Journal 454:361-369 DOI 10.1042/BJ20130545.
12. Daughdrill GW, Narayanaswami P, Gilmore SH, Belczyk A, Brown CJ. 2007. Dynamic behavior of an intrinsically unstructured linker domain is conserved in the face of negligible amino acid sequence conservation. Journal of Molecular Evolution 65:277-288 DOI 10.1007/s00239-007-9011-2.
13. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. 2009. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annual Review of Biochemistry 78:399-434 DOI 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809.
14. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. 2005. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 6:197-208 DOI 10.1038/nrm1589.
15. Erker Y, Neyret-Kahn H, Seeler JS, Dejean A, AtfiA, Levy L. 2013. Arkadia, a novel SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase involved in PML degradation. Molecular and Cellular Biology 33:2163-2177 DOI 10.1128/MCB.01019-12.
16. Foresti O, Ruggiano A, Hannibal-Bach HK, Ejsing CS, Carvalho P. 2013. Sterol homeostasis requires regulated degradation of squalene monooxygenase by the ubiquitin ligase Doa10/Teb4. Elife 2:e00953 DOI 10.7554/eLife.00953.
17. Fredrickson EK, Clowes Candadai SV, Tam CH, Gardner RG. 2013. Means of selfpreservation: how an intrinsically disordered ubiquitin-protein ligase averts selfdestruction. Molecular Biology of the Cell 24:1041-1052 DOI 10.1091/mbc. E12-11-0811.
18. Gallagher PS, Clowes Candadai SV, Gardner RG. 2014. The requirement for Cdc48/p97 in nuclear protein quality control degradation depends on the substrate and correlates with substrate insolubility. Journal of Cell Science 127:1980-1991 DOI 10.1242/jcs.141838.
19. Gardner RG, Nelson ZW, Gottschling DE. 2005. Degradation-mediated protein quality control in the nucleus. Cell 120:803-815 DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.016.
20. Guerriero CJ, Weiberth KF, Brodsky JL. 2013. Hsp70 targets a cytoplasmic quality control substrate to the San1p ubiquitin ligase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:18506-18520 DOI 10.1074/jbc. M113.475905.
21. Guharoy M, Bhowmick P, Sallam M, Tompa P. 2016. Tripartite degrons confer diversity and specificity on regulated protein degradation in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nature Communications 7:10239 DOI 10.1038/ncomms10239.
22. Habeck G, Ebner FA, Shimada-Kreft H, Kreft SG. 2015. The yeast ERAD-C ubiquitin ligase Doa10 recognizes an intramembrane degron. Journal of Cell Biology 209:261-273 DOI 10.1083/jcb.201408088.
23. Her YR, Chung IK. 2009. Ubiquitin Ligase RLIM Modulates Telomere Length Homeostasis through a Proteolysis of TRF1. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284:8557-8566 DOI 10.1074/jbc. M806702200.
24. Kanehisa M, Goto S. 2000. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 28:27-30 DOI 10.1093/nar/28.1.27.
25. Kleiger G, Mayor T. 2014. Perilous journey: a tour of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Trends in Cell Biology 24:352-359 DOI 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.12.003.
26. Kriegenburg F, Jakopec V, Poulsen EG, Nielsen SV, Roguev A, Krogan N, Gordon C, Fleig U, Hartmann-Petersen R. 2014. A chaperone-assisted degradation pathway targets kinetochore proteins to ensure genome stability. PLoS Genetics 10:e1004140 DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004140.
27. Li W, Bengtson MH, Ulbrich A, Matsuda A, Reddy VA, Orth A, Chanda SK, Batalov S, Joazeiro CA. 2008. Genome-wide and functional annotation of human E3 ubiquitin ligases identifies MULAN, a mitochondrial E3 that regulates the organelle's dynamics and signaling. PLoS ONE 3:e1487 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001487.
28. Liu W, Rui H, Wang J, Lin S, He Y, Chen M, Li Q, Ye Z, Zhang S, Chan SC, Chen YG, Han J, Lin SC. 2006. Axin is a scaffold protein in TGF-beta signaling that promotes degradation of Smad7 by Arkadia. EMBO Journal 25:1646-1658 DOI 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601057.
29. Loring GL, Christensen KC, Gerber SA, Brenner C. 2008. Yeast Chfr homologs retard cell cycle at G1 and G2/M via Ubc4 and Ubc13/Mms2-dependent ubiquitination. Cell Cycle 7:96-105 DOI 10.4161/cc.7.1.5113.
30. Mahani A, Henriksson J, Wright AP. 2013. Origins of Myc proteins-using intrinsic protein disorder to trace distant relatives. PLoS ONE 8:e75057 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0075057.
31. Meszaros B, Simon I, Dosztanyi Z. 2009. Prediction of protein binding regions in disordered proteins. PLoS Computational Biology 5:e1000376 DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000376.
32. Metzger MB, Pruneda JN, Klevit RE, Weissman AM. 2014. RING-type E3 ligases: master manipulators of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and ubiquitination. Biochimica et Biophysica ACTA/General Subjects 1843:47-60 DOI 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.05.026.
33. Miyazaki K, Fujita T, Ozaki T, Kato C, Kurose Y, Sakamoto M, Kato S, Goto T, Itoyama Y, Aoki M, Nakagawara A. 2004. NEDL1, a novel ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase for dishevelled-1, targets mutant superoxide dismutase-1. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279:11327-11335 DOI 10.1074/jbc. M312389200.
34. Nielsen SV, Poulsen EG, Rebula CA, Hartmann-Petersen R. 2014. Protein quality control in the nucleus. Biomolecules 4:646-661 DOI 10.3390/biom4030646.
35. Park SH, Kukushkin Y, Gupta R, Chen T, Konagai A, Hipp MS, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU. 2013. PolyQ proteins interfere with nuclear degradation of cytosolic proteins by sequestering the Sis1p chaperone. Cell 154:134-145 DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.003.
36. Petrovich A, Borne A, Uversky VN, Xue B. 2015. Identifying similar patterns of structural flexibility in proteins by disorder prediction and dynamic programming. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16:13829-13849 DOI 10.3390/ijms160613829.
37. Plechanovova A, Jaffray EG, McMahon SA, Johnson KA, Navratilova I, Naismith JH, Hay RT. 2011. Mechanism of ubiquitylation by dimeric RING ligase RNF4. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 18:1052-1059 DOI 10.1038/nsmb.2108.
38. Potenza E, Di Domenico T, Walsh I, Tosatto SC. 2015. MobiDB 2.0: an improved database of intrinsically disordered and mobile proteins. Nucleic Acids Research 43:D315-D320 DOI 10.1093/nar/gku982.
39. Poulsen SL, Hansen RK, Wagner SA, Van Cuijk L, Van Belle GJ, Streicher W, Wikstrom M, Choudhary C, Houtsmuller AB, Marteijn JA, Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N. 2013. RNF111/Arkadia is a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase that facilitates the DNA damage response. Journal of Cell Biology 201:797-807 DOI 10.1083/jcb.201212075.
40. Prudden J, Pebernard S, Raffa G, Slavin DA, Perry JJ, Tainer JA, McGowan CH, Boddy MN. 2007. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO Journal 26:4089-4101 DOI 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601838.
41. Ravid T, Hochstrasser M. 2007. Autoregulation of an E2 enzyme by ubiquitin-chain assembly on its catalytic residue. Nature Cell Biology 9:422-427 DOI 10.1038/ncb1558.
42. Ravid T, Kreft SG, Hochstrasser M. 2006. Membrane and soluble substrates of the Doa10 ubiquitin ligase are degraded by distinct pathways. EMBO Journal 25:533-543 DOI 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600946.
43. Rodrigo-Brenni MC, Gutierrez E, Hegde RS. 2014. Cytosolic quality control of mislocalized proteins requires RNF126 recruitment to Bag6. Molecular Cell 55:227-237 DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.025.
44. Rosenbaum JC, Fredrickson EK, Oeser ML, Garrett-Engele CM, Locke MN, Richardson LA, Nelson ZW, Hetrick ED, Milac TI, Gottschling DE, Gardner RG. 2011. Disorder targets misorder in nuclear quality control degradation: a disordered ubiquitin ligase directly recognizes its misfolded substrates. Molecular Cell 41:93-106 DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.12.004.
45. Rosenbaum JC, Gardner RG. 2011. How a disordered ubiquitin ligase maintains order in nuclear protein homeostasis. Nucleus 2:264-270 DOI 10.4161/nucl.2.4.16118.
46. Sriramachandran AM, Dohmen RJ. 2014. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases. Biochimica et Biophysica ACTA/General Subjects 1843:75-85 DOI 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.08.022.
47. Tammsalu T, Matic I, Jaffray EG, Ibrahim AF, Tatham MH, Hay RT. 2014. Proteomewide identification of SUMO2 modification sites. Science Signaling 7:rs2. 1-10 DOI 10.1126/scisignal.2005146.
48. Tanaka H, Takahashi T, Xie Y, Minami R, Yanagi Y, Hayashishita M, Suzuki R, Yokota N, Shimada M, Mizushima T, Kuwabara N, Kato R, Kawahara H. 2016. A conserved island of BAG6/Scythe is related to ubiquitin domains and participates in short hydrophobicity recognition. FEBS Journal 283:662-677 DOI 10.1111/febs.13618.
49. Tatham MH, Geoffroy MC, Shen L, Plechanovova A, Hattersley N, Jaffray EG, Palvimo JJ, Hay RT. 2008. RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nature Cell Biology 10:538-546 DOI 10.1038/ncb1716.
50. Tatham MH, Matic I, Mann M, Hay RT. 2011. Comparative proteomic analysis identifies a role for SUMO in protein quality control. Science Signaling 4:rs4. 1-12 DOI 10.1126/scisignal.2001484.
51. Theodoraki MA, Nillegoda NB, Saini J, Caplan AJ. 2012. A network of ubiquitin ligases is important for the dynamics of misfolded protein aggregates in yeast. Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:23911-23922 DOI 10.1074/jbc. M112.341164.
52. Tompa P. 2002. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 27:527-533 DOI 10.1016/S0968-0004(02)02169-2.
53. Uzunova K, Gottsche K, Miteva M, Weisshaar SR, Glanemann C, Schnellhardt M, Niessen M, Scheel H, Hofmann K, Johnson ES, Praefcke GJ, Dohmen RJ. 2007. Ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic control of SUMO conjugates. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282:34167-34175 DOI 10.1074/jbc. M706505200.
54. Vittal V, Shi L, Wenzel DM, Scaglione KM, Duncan ED, Basrur V, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Baker D, Paulson HL, Brzovic PS, Klevit RE. 2015. Intrinsic disorder drives N-terminal ubiquitination by Ube2w. Nature Chemical Biology 11:83-89 DOI 10.1038/nchembio.1700.
55. Vogt B, Hofmann K. 2012. Bioinformatical detection of recognition factors for ubiquitin and SUMO. Methods in Molecular Biology 832:249-261 DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-474-2_18.
56. Wang X, Herr RA, Hansen TH. 2012. Ubiquitination of substrates by esterification. Traffic 13:19-24 DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01269.x.
57. Wang Z, Jones GM, Prelich G. 2006. Genetic analysis connects SLX5 and SLX8 to the SUMO pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 172:1499-1509 DOI 10.1534/genetics.105.052811.
58. Wang Q, Liu Y, Soetandyo N, Baek K, Hegde R, Ye Y. 2011. A ubiquitin ligase-associated chaperone holdase maintains polypeptides in soluble states for proteasome degradation. Molecular Cell 42:758-770 DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.010.
59. Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT. 2004. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. Journal of Molecular Biology 337:635-645 DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.002.
60. Westerbeck JW, Pasupala N, Guillotte M, Szymanski E, Matson BC, Esteban C, Kerscher O. 2014. A SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase is involved in the degradation of the nuclear pool of the SUMO E3 ligase Siz1. Molecular Biology of the Cell 25:1-16 DOI 10.1091/mbc. E13-05-0291.
61. Xie Y, Varshavsky A. 2002. UFD4 lacking the proteasome-binding region catalyses ubiquitination but is impaired in proteolysis. Nature Cell Biology 4:1003-1007 DOI 10.1038/ncb889.
62. Xu Y, Liu Y, Lee JG, Ye Y. 2013. A ubiquitin-like domain recruits an oligomeric chaperone to a retrotranslocation complex in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:18068-18076 DOI 10.1074/jbc. M112.449199.
63. Xu K, Shimelis H, Linn DE, Jiang R, Yang X, Sun F, Guo Z, Chen H, Li W, Chen H, Kong X, Melamed J, Fang S, Xiao Z, Veenstra TD, Qiu Y. 2009. Regulation of androgen receptor transcriptional activity and specificity by RNF6-induced ubiquitination. Cancer Cell 15:270-282 DOI 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.02.021.
64. Yang L, Mullen JR, Brill SJ. 2006. Purification of the yeast Slx5-Slx8 protein complex and characterization of its DNA-binding activity. Nucleic Acids Research 34:5541-5551 DOI 10.1093/nar/gkl685.