Network-based metabolic analysis and microbial community modeling

Current Opinion in Microbiology

Volumn 31, Issue , 2016, Pages 124-131

  Cardona, Cesar ^a   Weisenhorn, Pamela ^a,b   Henry, Chris ^b   Gilbert, Jack A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ECOLOGY; IDENTIFICATION KEY; METABOLITE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE; SPECIES; BACTERIAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; METABOLISM; MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM; ORGANISMAL INTERACTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

BACTERIA; BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MICROBIAL CONSORTIA; MICROBIAL INTERACTIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84962701672     PISSN: 13695274     EISSN: 18790364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.03.008     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Curtis T.P., Sloan W.T., Scannell J.W. Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:10494-10499.
2. Sessitsch A., Mitter B. 21st century agriculture: integration of plant microbiomes for improved crop production and food security. Microb Biotechnol 2015, 8:32-33.
3. Wang H., Masters S., Edwards M.A., Falkinham J.O., Pruden A. Effect of disinfectant, water age, and pipe materials on bacterial and eukaryotic community structure in drinking water biofilm. Environ Sci Technol 2014, 48:1426-1435.
4. Althani A., Marei H.E., Hamdi W.S., Nasrallah G.K., El Zowalaty M.E., Al Khdor S., Al-Asmakh M., Abdel-Aziz H. Human microbiome and its association with health and diseases. J Cell Physiol 2015, 10.1002/jcp.25284.
5. Korem T., Zeevi D., Suez J., Weinberger A., Avnit-Sagi T., Pompan-Lotan M., Matot E., Jona G., Harmelin A., Cohen N., et al. Growth dynamics of gut microbiota in health and disease inferred from single metagenomic samples. Science 2015, 10.1126/science.aac4812.
6. Litchman E., Edwards K.F., Klausmeier C.A. Microbial resource utilization traits and trade-offs: implications for community structure, functioning, and biogeochemical impacts at present and in the future. Front Microbiol 2015, 6.
7. Rousk J., Bengtson P. Microbial regulation of global biogeochemical cycles. Terr Microbiol 2014, 5:103.
8. Horner-Devine M.C., Silver J.M., Leibold M.A., Bohannan B.J.M., Colwell R.K., Fuhrman J.A., Green J.L., Kuske C.R., Martiny J.B.H., Muyzer G., et al. A comparison of taxon co-occurrence patterns for macro- and microorganisms. Ecology 2007, 88:1345-1353.
9. Ma B., Wang H., Dsouza M., Lou J., He Y., Dai Z., Brookes P.C., Xu J., Gilbert J.A. Geographic patterns of co-occurrence network topological features for soil microbiota at continental scale in eastern China. ISME J 2016, 10.1038/ismej.2015.261.
10. Kell D.B., Goodacre R. Metabolomics and systems pharmacology: why and how to model the human metabolic network for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2014, 19:171-182.
11. Sander E.L., Wootton J.T., Allesina S. What can interaction webs tell us about species roles?. PLoS Comput Biol 2015, 11:e1004330.
12. Moore J.H. Computational analysis of gene-gene interactions using multifactor dimensionality reduction. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2004, 4:795-803.
13. Bahram M., Harend H., Tedersoo L. Network perspectives of ectomycorrhizal associations. Fungal Ecol 2014, 7:70-77.
14. Faust K., Raes J. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012, 10:538-550.
15. Lupatini M., Suleiman A.K.A., Jacques R.J.S., Antoniolli Z.I., de Siqueira Ferreira A., Kuramae E.E., Roesch L.F.W. Network topology reveals high connectance levels and few key microbial genera within soils. Soil Process 2014, 2:10.
16. Faust K., Sathirapongsasuti J.F., Izard J., Segata N., Gevers D., Raes J., Huttenhower C. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8:e1002606.
17. ccrepe: Compositionality Corrected by REnormalization and PErmutation | The Huttenhower Lab. []. http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/ccrepe.
18. Consortium T.H.M.P. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012, 486:207-214.
19. Langfelder P., Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform 2008, 9:559.
20. Guidi L., Chaffron S., Bittner L., Eveillard D., Larhlimi A., Roux S., Darzi Y., Audic S., Berline L., Brum J.R., et al. Plankton networks driving carbon export in the oligotrophic ocean. Nature 2016.
21. Friedman J., Alm E.J. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8:e1002687.
22. Bakker M.G., Schlatter D.C., Otto-Hanson L., Kinkel L.L. Diffuse symbioses: roles of plant-plant, plant-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions in structuring the soil microbiome. Mol Ecol 2014, 23:1571-1583.
23. Ban Y., An L., Jiang H. Investigating microbial co-occurrence patterns based on metagenomic compositional data. Bioinformatics 2015, 31:3322-3329.
24. Fang H., Huang C., Zhao H., Deng M. CCLasso: correlation inference for compositional data through Lasso. Bioinformatics 2015, 31:3172-3180.
25. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning 2001, Springer New York Inc.
26. Weiss S., Van Treuren W., Lozupone C., Faust K., Friedman J., Deng Y., Xia L.C., Xu Z.Z., Ursell L., Alm E.J., et al. Correlation detection strategies in microbial data sets vary widely in sensitivity and precision. ISME J 2016, 10.1038/ismej.2015.235.
27. Meinshausen N., Bühlmann P. High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso. Ann Stat 2006, 34:1436-1462.
28. Friedman J., Hastie T., Tibshirani R. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 2008, 9:432-441.
29. American Gut. http://humanfoodproject.com/americangut.
30. Kurtz Z.D., Müller C.L., Miraldi E.R., Littman D.R., Blaser M.J., Bonneau R.A. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2015, 11:e1004226.
31. Steele J.A., Countway P.D., Xia L., Vigil P.D., Beman J.M., Kim D.Y., Chow C.-E.T., Sachdeva R., Jones A.C., Schwalbach M.S., et al. Marine bacterial, archaeal and protistan association networks reveal ecological linkages. ISME J 2011, 5:1414-1425.
32. Sohm J.A., Ahlgren N.A., Thomson Z.J., Williams C., Moffett J.W., Saito M.A., Webb E.A., Rocap G. Co-occurring Synechococcus ecotypes occupy four major oceanic regimes defined by temperature, macronutrients and iron. ISME J 2016, 10:333-345.
33. Xia L.C., Ai D., Cram J., Fuhrman J.A., Sun F. Efficient statistical significance approximation for local similarity analysis of high-throughput time series data. Bioinformatics 2013, 29:230-237.
34. Durno W.E., Hanson N.W., Konwar K.M., Hallam S.J. Expanding the boundaries of local similarity analysis. BMC Genom 2013, 14:S3.
35. Mäkinen V.-P., Civelek M., Meng Q., Zhang B., Zhu J., Levian C., Huan T., Segrè A.V., Ghosh S., Vivar J., et al. Integrative genomics reveals novel molecular pathways and gene networks for coronary artery disease. PLOS Genet 2014, 10:e1004502.
36. Trifonova N., Kenny A., Maxwell D., Duplisea D., Fernandes J., Tucker A. Spatio-temporal Bayesian network models with latent variables for revealing trophic dynamics and functional networks in fisheries ecology. Ecol Inform 2015, 30:142-158.
37. Shafiei M., Dunn K.A., Boon E., MacDonald S.M., Walsh D.A., Gu H., Bielawski J.P. BioMiCo: a supervised Bayesian model for inference of microbial community structure. Microbiome 2015, 3:8.
38. Larsen P.E., Collart F.R., Field D., Meyer F., Keegan K.P., Henry C.S., McGrath J., Quinn J., Gilbert J.A. Predicted Relative Metabolomic Turnover (PRMT): determining metabolic turnover from a coastal marine metagenomic dataset. Microb Inform Exp 2011, 1:4.
39. Meyer P.E., Lafitte F., Bontempi G. minet: A R/bioconductor package for inferring large transcriptional networks using mutual information. BMC Bioinform 2008, 9:461.
40. Lima-Mendez G., Faust K., Henry N., Decelle J., Colin S., Carcillo F., Chaffron S., Ignacio-Espinosa J.C., Roux S., Vincent F., et al. Determinants of community structure in the global plankton interactome. Science 2015, 348:1262073.
41. Soffer N., Zaneveld J., Vega Thurber R. Phage-bacteria network analysis and its implication for the understanding of coral disease. Environ Microbiol 2015, 17:1203-1218.
42. Faust K., Lima-Mendez G., Lerat J.-S., Sathirapongsasuti J.F., Knight R., Huttenhower C., Lenaerts T., Raes J. Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks. Syst Microbiol 2015, 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01200.
43. Reshef D.N., Reshef Y.A., Finucane H.K., Grossman S.R., McVean G., Turnbaugh P.J., Lander E.S., Mitzenmacher M., Sabeti P.C. Detecting novel associations in large datasets. Science 2011, 334:1518-1524.
44. Fagervold S.K., Bourgeois S., Pruski A.M., Charles F., Kerhervé P., Vétion G., Galand P.E. River organic matter shapes microbial communities in the sediment of the Rhône prodelta. ISME J 2014, 8:2327-2338.
45. Widder S., Besemer K., Singer G.A., Ceola S., Bertuzzo E., Quince C., Sloan W.T., Rinaldo A., Battin T.J. Fluvial network organization imprints on microbial co-occurrence networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:12799-12804.
46. Peura S., Bertilsson S., Jones R.I., Eiler A. Resistant microbial co-occurrence patterns inferred by network topology. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015, 10.1128/AEM.03660-14.
47. Coyte K.Z., Schluter J., Foster K.R. The ecology of the microbiome: networks, competition, and stability. Science 2015, 350:663-666.
48. Berry D., Widder S. Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks. Microb. Symbioses 2014, 5:219.
49. Aziz R.K., Bartels D., Best A.A., DeJongh M., Disz T., Edwards R.A., Formsma K., Gerdes S., Glass E.M., Kubal M., et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom 2008, 9:75.
50. Consortium T.G.O. Gene ontology consortium: going forward. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 43:D1049-D1056.
51. Dias O., Rocha M., Ferreira E.C., Rocha I. Merlin: Metabolic Models Reconstruction Using Genome-Scale Information 2010.
52. Agren R., Liu L., Shoaie S., Vongsangnak W., Nookaew I., Nielsen J. The RAVEN toolbox and its use for generating a genome-scale metabolic model for Penicillium chrysogenum. PLOS Comput Biol 2013, 9:e1002980.
53. Feng X., Xu Y., Chen Y., Tang Y.J. MicrobesFlux: a web platform for drafting metabolic models from the KEGG database. BMC Syst Biol 2012, 6:94.
54. Henry C.S., DeJongh M., Best A.A., Frybarger P.M., Linsay B., Stevens R.L. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:977-982.
55. Palumbo A., Baumohl J., Best A., Bischof J., Bowen B., Brettin T., Brown T., Canon S., Chan S., Chandonia J., et al. KBase: an integrated knowledgebase for predictive biology and environmental research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (BIOCOMP). The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp) 2014, 1.
56. Jeong H., Tombor B., Albert R., Oltvai Z.N., Barabási A.-L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000, 407:651-654.
57. Wunderlich Z., Mirny L.A. Using the topology of metabolic networks to predict viability of mutant strains. Biophys J 2006, 91:2304-2311.
58. Freilich S., Kreimer A., Borenstein E., Gophna U., Sharan R., Ruppin E. Decoupling environment-dependent and independent genetic robustness across bacterial species. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000690.
59. Levy R., Borenstein E. Metabolic modeling of species interaction in the human microbiome elucidates community-level assembly rules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:12804-12809.
60. Varma A., Palsson B.O. Metabolic flux balancing: basic concepts, scientific and practical use. Nat Biotechnol 1994, 12:994-998.
61. Freilich S., Zarecki R., Eilam O., Segal E.S., Henry C.S., Kupiec M., Gophna U., Sharan R., Ruppin E. Competitive and cooperative metabolic interactions in bacterial communities. Nat Commun 2011, 2:589.
62. Zelezniak A., Andrejev S., Ponomarova O., Mende D.R., Bork P., Patil K.R. Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112:6449-6454.
63. Ibarra R.U., Edwards J.S., Palsson B.O. Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth. Nature 2002, 420:186-189.
64. Zomorrodi A.R., Maranas C.D. OptCom: a multi-level optimization framework for the metabolic modeling and analysis of microbial communities. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8:e1002363.
65. Mahadevan R., Edwards J.S., Doyle F.J. Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. Biophys J 2002, 83:1331-1340.
66. Harcombe W.R., Riehl W.J., Dukovski I., Granger B.R., Betts A., Lang A.H., Bonilla G., Kar A., Leiby N., Mehta P., et al. Metabolic resource allocation in individual microbes determines ecosystem interactions and spatial dynamics. Cell Rep 2014, 7:1104-1115.
67. Gies E.A., Konwar K.M., Beatty J.T., Hallam S.J. Illuminating microbial dark matter in meromictic Sakinaw lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014, 10.1128/AEM.01774-14.