Challenges facing contemporary preimplantation genetic screening

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 151-157

  Juneau, Caroline ^a,b   Franasiak, Jason ^a,b   Treff, Nathan ^a,b  

^a REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

aneuploidy; duplications deletions; mosaicism; preimplantation genetic screening

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MOSAICISM; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; PATIENT SAFETY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; VALIDATION STUDY; ALGORITHM; BLASTOCYST; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; NIDATION; PATHOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

ALGORITHMS; ANEUPLOIDY; BLASTOCYST; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MOSAICISM; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84962109546     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: 1473656X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000270     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15, 169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 656-663
2. Hassold T, Hunt P. Maternal age and chromosomally abnormal pregnancies: what we know and what we wish we knew. Curr Opin Pediatr 2009; 21: 703-708
3. Hardarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2806-2812
4. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-Analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 454-466
5. Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Garciá-Velasco JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-Analysis. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 1503-1512
6. Scott RT, Ferry K, Su J, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 870-875
7. Treff NR, Northrop LE, Kasabwala K, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 1606-1612
8. Forman EJ, Hong KH, Treff NR, Scott RT. Comprehensive chromosome screening and embryo selection: moving toward single euploid blastocyst transfer. Semin Reprod Med 2012; 30: 236-242
9. Forman EJ, Hong KH, Franasiak JM, Scott RT. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 157.e1-157.e6
10. Fiorentino F, Bono S, Biricik A, et al. Application of next-generation sequencing technology for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of blastocysts in clinical preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl 2014; 29: 2802-2813
11. Mardis ER. New strategies and emerging technologies for massively parallel sequencing: applications in medical research. Genome Med 2009; 1: 40
12. Scott KL, Hong KH, Scott RT. Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 608-614
13. Scott RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 624-630
14. Coskun S, Alsmadi O. Whole genome amplification from a single cell: a new era for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27: 297-302
15. Handyside AH, Robinson MD, Simpson RJ, et al. Isothermal whole genome amplification from single and small numbers of cells: a new era for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of inherited disease. Mol Hum Reprod 2004; 10: 767-772
16. Sher G, Keskintepe L, KeskintepeM, et al. Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genomic hybridization [correction of hybrydization] provides a highly reliable method for selecting 'competent' embryos, markedly improving in vitro fertilization outcome: a multiphase study. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1033-1040
17. Dean FB, Hosono S, Fang L, et al. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 5261-5266
18. Treff NR, Scott RT. Methods for comprehensive chromosome screening of oocytes and embryos: capabilities, limitations, and evidence of validity. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012; 29: 381-390
19. Hahn S, Garvin AM, Di Naro E, Holzgreve W. Allele drop-out can occur in alleles differing by a single nucleotide and is not alleviated by preamplification or minor template increments. Genet Test 1998; 2: 351-355
20. Treff NR, Tao X, Ferry KM, et al. Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-Time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 819-824
21. Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, et al. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2017-2021
22. Northrop LE, Treff NR, Levy B, Scott RT. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16: 590-600
23. Xiong B, Tan K, Tan YQ, et al. Using SNP array to identify aneuploidy and segmental imbalance in translocation carriers. Genom Data 2014; 2: 92-95
24. Scott RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 697-703
25. Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl 2010; 25: 1066-1075
26. Treff NR, Scott RT. Four-hour quantitative real-Time polymerase chain reaction-based comprehensive chromosome screening and accumulating evidence of accuracy, safety, predictive value, and clinical efficacy. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 1049-1053
27. Werner MD, Franasiak JM, Hong KH, et al. A prospective, blinded, nonselection study to determine the predictive value of ploidy results using a novel method of targeted amplification based next generation sequencing (NGS) for comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS). Fertil Steril 2015; 104: e12-e13
28. Taylor TH, Gitlin SA, Patrick JL, et al. The origin, mechanisms, incidence and clinical consequences of chromosomal mosaicism in humans. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20: 571-581
29. Capalbo A, Wright G, Elliott T, et al. FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl 2013; 28: 2298-2307
30. Mertzanidou A, Wilton L, Cheng J, et al. Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl 2013; 28: 256-264
31. Chow JFC, Yeung WSB, Lau EYL, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization analyses of all blastomeres of a cohort of embryos from young IVF patients revealed significant contribution of mitotic errors to embryo mosaicism at the cleavage stage. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014; 12: 105
32. Mamas T, Gordon A, Brown A, et al. Detection of aneuploidy by array comparative genomic hybridization using cell lines to mimic a mosaic trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 943-947
33. Ruttanajit T, Chanchamroen S, Cram DS, et al. Detection and quantitation of chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts using copy number variation sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2016; 36: 154-162
34. Greco E, Minasi MG, Fiorentino F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2089-2090
35. Treff NR, Tao X, Schillings WJ, et al. Use of single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays to distinguish between balanced and normal chromosomes in embryos from a translocation carrier. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: e58-e65
36. van Uum CMJ, Stevens SJC, Dreesen JCFM, et al. SNP array-based copy number and genotype analyses for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human unbalanced translocations. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20: 938-944
37. Bono S, Biricik A, Spizzichino L, et al. Validation of a semiconductor nextgeneration sequencing-based protocol for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of reciprocal translocations. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 938-944
38. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med 2009; 15: 577-583
39. Rabinowitz M, Ryan A, Gemelos G, et al. Origins and rates of aneuploidy in human blastomeres. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 395-401
40. Vera-Rodríguez M, Michel C-E, Mercader A, et al. Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril 2016. [Epub ahead of print]