Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: Single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 210, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 157.e1-157.e6

  Forman, Eric J ^a   Hong, Kathleen H ^a,b   Franasiak, Jason M ^a   Scott, Richard T ^a  

^a REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

aneuploidy screening; in vitro fertilization; preimplantation genetic screening; single embryo transfer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC SCREENING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; LENGTH OF STAY; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING TEST; CHROMOSOME DISORDERS; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; BIRTH WEIGHT; CHROMOSOME DISORDERS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER;

EID: 84893637966     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J.A. Land, and J.L. Evers Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting Hum Reprod 18 2003 455 457 (Pubitemid 36236287)
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2009 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports 2011 US Department of Health and Human Services Atlanta
3. S. Murray, A. Shetty, A. Rattray, V. Taylor, and S. Bhattacharya A randomized comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer Hum Reprod 19 2004 911 916 (Pubitemid 38456057)
4. S. Mastenbroek, M. Twisk, F. van der Veen, and S. Repping Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs Hum Reprod Update 17 2011 454 466
5. R.T. Scott Jr., K.M. Upham, E.J. Forman, T. Zhao, and N.R. Treff Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial Fertil Steril 100 2013 624 630
6. L.E. Northrop, N.R. Treff, B. Levy, and R.T. Scott Jr. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts Mol Hum Reprod 16 2010 590 600
7. N.R. Treff, X. Tao, K.M. Ferry, J. Su, D. Taylor, and R.T. Scott Jr. Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening Fertil Steril 97 2012 819 824
8. N.R. Treff, J. Su, X. Tao, B. Levy, and R.T. Scott Jr. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays Fertil Steril 94 2010 2017 2021
9. R.T. Scott Jr., K. Ferry, J. Su, X. Tao, K. Scott, and N.R. Treff Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study Fertil Steril 97 2012 870 875
10. R.T. Scott Jr., K.M. Upham, and E.J. Forman et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial Fertil Steril 100 2013 697 703
11. E.J. Forman, K.H. Hong, and K.M. Ferry et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial Fertil Steril 100 2013 100 107.e1
12. Z. Pandian, S. Bhattacharya, O. Ozturk, G. Serour, and A. Templeton Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 2009 CD003416
13. U.M. Reddy, R.J. Wapner, R.W. Rebar, and R.J. Tasca Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop Obstet Gynecol 109 2007 967 977 (Pubitemid 46559087)
14. T.A. Gelbaya, I. Tsoumpou, and L.G. Nardo The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fertil Steril 94 2010 936 945
15. A. Thurin, J. Hausken, and T. Hillensjo et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization N Engl J Med 351 2004 2392 2402 (Pubitemid 40485991)
16. E.G. Papanikolaou, M. Camus, E.M. Kolibianakis, L. Van Landuyt, A. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos N Engl J Med 354 2006 1139 1146
17. D.K. Gardner, E. Surrey, D. Minjarez, A. Leitz, J. Stevens, and W.B. Schoolcraft Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial Fertil Steril 81 2004 551 555 (Pubitemid 38376109)
18. B.E. Reubinoff, A. Samueloff, M. Ben-Haim, S. Friedler, J.G. Schenker, and A. Lewin Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study Fertil Steril 67 1997 1077 1083 (Pubitemid 27241901)
19. M. Werner, A. Reh, J. Grifo, and M.A. Perle Characteristics of chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed after spontaneous abortions in an infertile population J Assist Reprod Genet 29 2012 817 820
20. D. Bettio, A. Venci, and P.E. Levi Setti Chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages after different assisted reproduction procedures Placenta 29 Suppl 2008 126 128
21. R.J. Wapner, C.L. Martin, and B. Levy et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis N Engl J Med 367 2012 2175 2184