Validation of a semiconductor next-generation sequencing-based protocol for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of reciprocal translocations

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 938-944

  Bono, S ^a   Biricik, A ^a   Spizzichino, L ^a   Nuccitelli, A ^a   Minasi, M G ^b   Greco, E ^b   Spinella, F ^a   Fiorentino, Francesco ^a  

^a GENOMA Molecular Genetics Laboratory   (Italy)

^b EUROPEAN HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME NUMBER; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECIPROCAL CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VALIDATION STUDY; FEMALE; GENE TRANSLOCATION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MALE; PROCEDURES;

FEMALE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MALE; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84943359197     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4665     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, et al. Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1209-18.
2. Verlinsky Y, Tur-Kaspa I, Cieslak J, et al. Preimplantation testing for chromosomal disorders improves reproductive outcome of poor-prognosis patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:219-25.
3. Scriven PN, Handyside AH, Ogilvie CM. Chromosome translocations: segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1998;18:1437-49.
4. Fischer J, Colls P, Escudero T, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) improves pregnancy outcome for translocation carriers with a history of recurrent losses. Fertil Steril 2010;94:283-9.
5. Munné S, Scott R, Sable D, et al. First pregnancies after preconception diagnosis of translocations of maternal origin. Fertil Steril 1998;69:675-81.
6. Munné S, Fung J, Cassel MJ, et al. Preimplantation genetic analysis of translocations: case-specific probes for interphase cell analysis. Hum Genet 1998;102:663-74.
7. Conn CM, Harper JC, Winston RML, et al. Infertile couples with Robertsonian translocations: preimplantation genetic analysis of embryos reveals chaotic cleavage divisions. Hum Genet 1998;102:117-23.
8. Verlinsky Y, Evsikov S. Karyotyping of human oocytes by chromosomal analysis of the second polar body. Mol Hum Reprod 1999;5:89-95.
9. Harper JC, Coonen E, De Rycke M, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection X: cycles from January to December 2007 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2008. Hum Reprod 2010;25:2685-707.
10. Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;4:183-96.
11. Velilla E, Escudero T, Munné S. Blastomere fixation techniques and risk of misdiagnosis for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;4:210-7.
12. De Ugarte M, Li M, Surrey M, et al. Accuracy of FISH analysis in predicting chromosomal status in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1049-54.
13. Fiorentino F, Kokkali G, Biricik A, et al. Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of chromosomal imbalances on embryos: the evolution of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal translocations. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2001-11.
14. Traversa MV, Carey L, Leigh D. A molecular strategy for routine preimplantation genetic diagnosis in both reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation carriers. Mol Hum Reprod 2010;16:329-37.
15. Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, et al. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2017-21.
16. Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sánchez-García J, et al. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 2011;95:953-8.
17. Wells D, Alfarawati S, Fragouli E. Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH. Mol Hum Reprod 2008;14:703-10.
18. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, et al. First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1560-74.
19. Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1925-35.
20. Treff NR, Northrop LE, Kasabwala K, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Fertil Steril 2011;95:1606-12.e1-2.
21. Tobler KJ, Brezina PR, Benner AT, et al. Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;31:843-50.
22. Colls P, Escudero T, Fischer J, et al. Validation of array comparative genome hybridization for diagnosis of translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;24:621-9.
23. Treff NR, Fedick A, Tao X, et al. Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1377-84.
24. Handyside AH. 24-Chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies. Fertil Steril 2013;100:595-602.
25. Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Bono S, et al. Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1375-82.
26. Fiorentino F, Bono S, Biricik A, et al. Application of next-generation sequencing technology for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of blastocysts in clinical preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Hum Reprod 2014;29:2802-13.
27. Martín J, Cervero A, Mir P, et al. The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1054-61.
28. Rubio C. Next-generation sequencing: challenges in reproductive genetics. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1252-3.
29. Wells D, Kaur K, Grifo J, et al. Clinical utilization of a rapid low-pass whole genome sequencing technique for the diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos prior to implantation. J Med Genet 2014;51:553-62.
30. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, et al. Integrative Genomics Viewer. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:24-6.
31. Le Caignec C, Spits C, Sermon K, et al. Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:e68.
32. Łukaszuk K, Pukszta S, Wells D, et al. Routine use of next-generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of blastomeres obtained from embryos on day 3 in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2015;103:1031-6.
33. Knapp M, Stiller M, Meyer M. Generating barcoded libraries for multiplex high-throughput sequencing. Methods Mol Biol 2012;840:155-70.