A two-process model of metacognitive monitoring: Evidence for general accuracy and error factors

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 44, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-10

  Gutierrez, Antonio P ^a   Schraw, Gregory ^b   Kuch, Fred ^b   Richmond, Aaron S ^c  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^c METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

Judgment accuracy and error; Metacognition; Monitoring; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961942927     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Azevedo R., Witherspoon A.M. Self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Handbook of metacognition in education 2009, 278-298. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.).
2. Bentler P.M. EQS 6 structural equations program manual 2005, Multivariate Software, Encino, CA. http://www.mvsoft.com.
3. Boekaerts M., Rozendaal J.S. Using multiple calibration measures in order to capture the complex picture of what affects students' accuracy of feeling of confidence. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20(4):372-382. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.03.002.
4. Bol L., Hacker D.J., Walck C.C., Nunnery J.A. The effects of individual or group guidelines on the calibration accuracy and achievement of high school biology students. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2012, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.004.
5. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modeling with EQS 2006, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, NJ. 2nd ed.
6. Campbell C. Middle years students' use of self-regulating strategies in an online journaling environment. Educational Technology & Society 2009, 12(3):98-106.
7. Chiappe D., MacDonald K. The evolution of domain-general mechanisms in intelligence and learning. Journal of General Psychology 2005, 132(1):5-40. 10.3200/GENP.132.1.5-40.
8. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates., Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
9. De Bruin A.B., Rikers R.M., Schmidt H.G. Monitoring accuracy and self-regulation when learning to play a chess endgame. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2005, 19:167-181. 10.1002/acp.1109.
10. Dinsmore D.L., Parkinson M.M. What are confidence judgments made of? Students' explanations for their confidence ratings and what that means for calibration. Learning and Instruction 2013, 24:4-14. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.06.001.
11. Duncan R.G. The role of domain-specific knowledge in generative reasoning about complicated multileveled phenomena. Cognition & Instruction 2007, 25:271-336. 10.1080/07370000701632355.
12. Efklides A. Metacognition: defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist 2008, 13:277-287. 10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277.
13. Efklides A. Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: the MASRL model. Educational Psychologist 2011, 46:6-25. 10.1080/00461520.2011.538645.
14. Ekstrom R.B., French J.W., Harman H.H. Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests 1976, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
15. Hadwin A.F., Webster E.A. Calibration in goal setting: examining the nature of judgments of confidence. Learning and Instruction 2013, 24:37-47. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.001.
16. Harris K.R., Graham S., Brindle M., Sandmel K. Metacognition and children's writing. Handbook of metacognition in education 2009, 131-153. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY US. D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.).
17. Hartwig M.K., Was C.A., Isaacson R.M., Dunlosky J. General knowledge monitoring as a predictor of in-class exam performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2012, 82:456-468. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02038.x.
18. Huff J.D., Nietfeld J.L. Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning 2009, 4:161-176. 10.1007/s11409-009-9042-8.
19. Kelemen W.L., Frost P.J., Weaver C. Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28(1):92-107. 10.3758/BF03211579.
20. Kline R. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2005, 165-207. Guilford Press, New York, NY.
21. Koriat A. The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review 2012, 119:80-113. 10.1037/a0025648.
22. Koriat A., Ackerman R., Adiv S., Lockl K., Schneider W. The effects of goaldriven and data-driven regulation on metacognitive monitoring during learning: a developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2013, Advance online publication. 10.1037/a0031768.
23. Lin L.M., Moore D., Zabrucky K.M. An assessment of students' calibration of comprehension and calibration of performance using multiple measures. Reading Psychology 2001, 22:111-128. 10.1080/02702710119125.
24. Lundeberg M., Mohan L. Context matters: gender and cross-cultural differences in confidence. Handbook of metacognition in education 2009, 221-239. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY. D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.).
25. Marshalek B., Lohman D.F., Snow R.E. The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence 1983, 7:107-127. 10.1016/0160-2896(83)90023-5.
26. McNamara D.S., Magliano J.P. Self-explanation and metacognition: the dynamics of reading. Handbook of metacognition in education 2009, 60-81. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY. D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.).
27. Mengelkamp C., Bannert M. Accuracy of confidence judgments: stability and generality in the learning process and predictive validity for learning outcome. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38:441-451. 10.3758/MC.38.4.441.
28. Nietfeld J.L., Cao L., Osborne J.W. Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. Journal of Experimental Education 2005, 74:7-28.
29. Ozuru Y., Kurby C.A., McNamara D.S. The effect of metacomprehension judgment task on comprehension monitoring and metacognitive accuracy. Metacognition and Learning 2012, 7:113-131. 10.1007/s11409-012-9087-y.
30. Pieschl S. Metacognitive calibration-an extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning 2009, 4:3-31. 10.1007/s11409-008-9030-4.
31. Pressley M., Harris K.R. Cognitive strategy instruction: from basic research to classroom instructions. Handbook of educational psychology 2006, 265-287. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed. P.A. Alexander, P.H. Winne (Eds.).
32. Satorra A. Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis: Advanced studies in theoretical and applied econometrics 2000, Vol. 36:233-247. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands. D.D.H. Heijmans, D.S.G. Pollock, A. Satorra (Eds.).
33. Schraw G. Measuring metacognitive judgments. Handbook of metacognition in education 2009, 415-429. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.).
34. Schraw G., Dunkle M.E., Bendixen L.D., Roedel T. Does a general monitoring skill exist?. Journal of Educational Psychology 1995, 87:433-444. 10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.433.
35. Schraw G., Nietfeld J. A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90:236-248. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.236.
36. Serra M.J., Metcalfe J. Effective implementation of metacognition. Handbook of metacognition in education 2009, 278-298. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.).
37. Stankov L. Complexity, metacognition, and fluid intelligence. Intelligence 2000, 28:121-143. 10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00033-1.
38. Stankov L., Crawford J.D. Confidence judgments in studies of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences 1996, 21:971-986. 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00130-4.
39. Stankov L., Lee J. Confidence and cognitive test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 2008, 100:961-976. 10.1037/a0012546.
40. Stankov L., Lee J., Luo W., Hogan D.J. Confidence: a better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety?. Learning and Individual Differences 2012, 22(6):747-758. 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.013.
41. van der Stel M., Veenman M.V.J. Development of metacognitive skillfulness: a longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences 2010, 20:220-224. 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.11.005.
42. van der Stel M., Veenman M.V.J. Metacognitive skills and intellectual ability of young adolescents: a longitudinal study from a developmental perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education 2014, 29:117-137. 10.1007/s10212-013-0190-5.
43. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Cleaning up your act: Screening data prior to analysis. Using multivariate statistics 2011, 60-116. Pearson, New York, NY. 6th ed.
44. Tricot A., Sweller J. Domain-specific knowledge and why teaching generic skills does not work. Educational Psychology Review 2014, 26:265-283. 10.1007/s10648-013-9243-1.
45. Vukman K.B. Developmental differences in metacognition and their connections with cognitive development in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development 2005, 12:211-221. 10.1007/s10804-005-7089-6.
46. Werts C.E., Linn R.L., Joreskog K.G. Intraclass reliability estimates: testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1974, 34(1):25-33. 10.1177/001316447403400104.
47. Winne P.H., Nesbit J.C. Supporting self-regulated learning with cognitive tools. Handbook of metacognition in education 2009, 259-277. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY US. D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.).
48. Zohar A., David A. Paving a clear path in a thick forest: a conceptual analysis of a metacognitive component. Metacognition & Learning 2009, 4(3):177-195. 10.1007/s11409-009-9044-6.