General knowledge monitoring as a predictor of in-class exam performance

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 456-468

  Hartwig, Marissa K ^a   Was, Chris A ^a   Isaacson, Randy M ^b   Dunlosky, John ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTH BEND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF EVALUATION; STATISTICS; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNITED STATES;

ACHIEVEMENT; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; LEARNING; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; SELF-ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84864591377     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: 20448279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02038.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 432-447. doi:10.1037/a0015928
2. Brunswik, E. (1996). Reasoning as a universal behavior model and a functional differentiation between "perception" and "thinking". In K. R. Hammond (Ed.), The psychology of Egon Brunswik (pp. 487-494). New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
3. Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011). Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 103-140). New York : Academic Press.
4. Dunlosky, J., Bottiroli, S., & Hartwig, M. (2009). Sins committed in the name of ecological validity: A call for representative design in education research. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education. New York : Psychology Press.
5. Dunlosky, J., Hartwig, M. K., Rawson, K. A., & Lipko, A. R. (2011). Improving college students' evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 467-484. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.502239
6. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Beverly Hills, CA : Sage Publications.
7. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., & Middleton, E. (2005). What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 551-565. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.011
8. Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732-764.
9. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 224-372. doi:10.3102/003465430303953
10. Kelemen, W. L., Frost, P. J., & Weaver, C. A., III (2000). Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory and Cognition, 28, 92-107. doi:10.3758/BF03211579
11. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
12. Maki, R. H., Jonas, D., & Kallod, M. (1994). The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 126-129. doi:10.3758/BF03200769
13. Maki, R. H., Shields, M., Wheeler, A. E., & Zacchilli, T. L. (2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 723-731. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.723
14. Mengelkamp, C., & Bannert, M. (2010). Accuracy of confidence judgments: Stability and generality in the learning process and predictive validity for learning outcome. Memory and Cognition, 38, 441-451. doi:10.3758/MC.38.4.441
15. Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 159-163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x
16. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125-173). New York : Academic Press.
17. Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 159-179. doi:10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6
18. Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2000). The rereading effect: Metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1004-1010. doi:10.3758/BF03209348
19. Schraw, G. (1995). Measures of feeling-of-knowing accuracy: A new look at an old problem. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 321-332. doi:10.1002/acp.2350090405
20. Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., Bendixen, L. D., & Roedel, T. D. (1995). Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 433-444.
21. Schraw, G., & Nietfeld, J. (1998). A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 236-248. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.236
22. Thiede, K. W. (1999). The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 662-667. doi:10.3758/BF03212976
23. Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M., (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129-160. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00011-5
24. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66
25. Thompson, W. B., & Mason, S. E. (1996). Instability of individual differences in the association between confidence judgments and memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 24, 226-234. doi:10.3758/BF03200883
26. Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (1995). Development and validation of an objectively scored measure of metacognition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA .
27. Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (2002). Knowing what you know and what you don't: Further research on metacognitive knowledge monitoring. College Board Research Report No. 2002-2003. New York : College Board.
28. Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (2009). The importance of knowing what you know: A knowledge monitoring framework for studying metacognition in education. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education. New York : Psychology Press.
29. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.