Online intravenous pump emulator: As effective as face-to-face simulation for training nursing students

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 40, Issue , 2016, Pages 198-203

  Terry, Victoria R ^a   Moloney, Clint ^a   Bowtell, Leslie ^a   Terry, Peter C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Clinical; Emulation; Intravenous; Nursing students; Simulation; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DEVICES; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LEARNING; MALE; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; PROCEDURES; SIMULATION TRAINING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; INTERNET; LEARNING; MALE; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; SIMULATION TRAINING; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 84961639697     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: 15322793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. eLearning for Undergraduate Health Professional Education: A Systematic Review Informing a Radical Transformation of Health Workforce Development 2015, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland. N. Al-Shorbaji, R. Atun, J. Car, A. Majeed, E. Wheeler (Eds.).
2. Anderson T. The Theory and Practice of Online Learning 2008, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
3. Anderson P., Townsend T. Medication errors: don't let them happen to you. Am. Nurse Today 2010, 5(3):23-27.
4. Billings D.M., Halstead J.A. Teaching in Nursing: A Guide for Faculty 2013, Elsevier Health Sciences, St Louis, MO.
5. Bowtell L., Moloney C., Kist A.A., Parker V., Maxwell A., Reedy N. Enhancing nursing education with remote access laboratories. Int. J. Online Eng. 2012, 8(S4):52-59. 10.3991/ijoe.v8iS4.2279.
6. Bowtell L., Kist A.A., Osbourne D., Parker V.R. Interactive emulator system to aid clinical practice outcomes for nurses. Int. J. Online Eng. 2013, 9(S5):32-37. 10.3991/ijoe.v9iS5.2771.
7. Brydges R., Nair P., Ma I., Shanks D., Hatala R. Directed self-regulated learning versus instructor-regulated learning in simulation training. Med. Educ. 2012, 46(7):648-656. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04268.
8. Cant R.P., Cooper S.J. Simulation in the internet age: the place of web-based simulation in nursing education. An integrative review. Nurse Educ. Today 2014, 34(12):1435-1442. 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.001.
9. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Routledge Academic, New York, NY.
10. Gagnon M.-P., Gagnon J., Desmartis M., Njoya M. The impact of blended teaching on knowledge, satisfaction, and self-directed learning in nursing undergraduates: a randomized, controlled trial. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 2013, 34(6):377-382. 10.5480/10-459.
11. George P.P., Papachristou N., Belisario J.M., Wang W., Wark P.A., Cotic Z., Car J. Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: a systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J. Glob. Health 2014, 4(1). 10.7189/jogh.04.010406.
12. Guest G., MacQueen K.M., Namey E.E. Applied Thematic Analysis 2011, Sage, New York, NY.
13. Harris M.A., Pittiglio L., Newton S.E., Moore G. Using simulation to improve the medication administration skills of undergraduate nursing students. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 2014, 35(1):26-29. 10.5480/11-552.1.
14. Herrington J., Oliver R. An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2000, 48(3):23-48.
15. Knowles M., Holton E.F., Swanson R.A. The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development 2005, Elsevier, New York, NY.
16. Krendl K.A., Broihier M. Student responses to computers: a longitudinal study. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 1992, 8(2):215-227. 10.2190/XTJJ-BK1N-44DV-NXL0.
17. Levett-Jones T.L. Self-directed learning: implications and limitations for undergraduate nursing education. Nurse Educ. Today 2005, 25(5):363-368. 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.03.003.
18. Mancuso-Murphy J. Distance education in nursing: an integrated review of online nursing students' experiences with technology-delivered instruction. J. Nurs. Educ. 2007, 46(6):252-260.
19. Mayville K.L. Knowledge Construction, Self-regulation, and Technology Strategies Used by Experienced Online Nursing Students to Actively Engage in Online Learning 2007, (Doctoral dissertation), Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.
20. McCutcheon K., Lohan M., Traynor M., Martin D. A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. J. Adv. Nurs. 2014, 71(2):255-270. 10.1111/jan.12509.
21. McMullan M., Jones R., Lea S. The effect of an interactive e-drug calculations package on nursing students' drug calculation ability and self-efficacy. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2011, 80(6):421-430. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.021.
22. Mitchell M.L., Henderson A., Groves M., Dalton M., Nulty D. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): optimising its value in the undergraduate nursing curriculum. Nurse Educ. Today 2009, 29(4):398-404. 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.10.007.
23. Moore G.C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 1991, 2:192-222. 10.1287/isre.2.3.192.
24. National Prescribing Service Medication Safety in Australia Current Status at November 2007 2008, National Prescribing Service, Sydney, NSW.
25. Oermann M. Technology and teaching innovations in nursing education: engaging the student. Nurse Educ. 2015, 40(2):55-56. 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000139.
26. Pang R.K., Kong D., deClifford J.-M., Lamp S.S., Leung B.K. Smart infusion pumps reduce intravenous medication administration errors at an Australian teaching hospital. J. Pharm. Pract. Res. 2011, 41(3):192-195. 10.1002/j.2055-2335.2011.tb00860.x.
27. Raman J. Mobile technology in nursing education: where do we go from here? A review of the literature. Nurse Educ. Today 2015, 35(5):663-672. 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.018.
28. Roberts C.A., Burke S.O. Nursing Research: A Quantitative and Qualitative Approach 1989, Jones and Bartlett, Boston. 10.1002/nur.4770130512.
29. Samawi Z., Miller T., Haras M.S. Using high-fidelity simulation and concept mapping to cultivate self-confidence in nursing students. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 2014, 35(6):408-409. 10.5480/12-1042.1.
30. Sears K., Goldsworthy S., Goodman W.M. The relationship between simulation in nursing education and medication safety. J. Nurs. Educ. 2010, 49(1):52-55. 10.3928/01484834-20090918-12.
31. Sherriff K., Burston S., Wallis M. Effectiveness of a computer based medication calculation education and testing programme for nurses. Nurse Educ. Today 2011, 32(1):46-51. 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.020.
32. Smith G.G., Passmore D., Faught T. The challenges of online nursing education. Internet High. Educ. 2009, 12(2):98-103. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.007.
33. Stolic S. Educational strategies aimed at improving student nurse's medication calculation skills: a review of the research literature. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2014, 14(5):491-503. 10.1016/j.nepr.2014.05.010.
34. Taxis K., Barber N. Causes of intravenous medication errors: an ethnographic study. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003, 12(5):343-347. 10.1136/qhc.12.5.343.
35. Tollefson J. Clinical Psychomotor Skills: Assessment Tools for Nursing Students 2012, Cengage Learning, Melbourne, VIC. fifth ed.
36. Williams P.E., Hellman C.M. Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first- and second-generation college students. Res. High. Educ. 2004, 45(1):71-82.
37. Yanhua C., Watson R. A review of clinical competence assessment in nursing. Nurse Educ. Today 2011, 31(8):832-836. 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.003.