Gas production and starch degradability of corn and barley meals differing in mean particle size

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 4347-4359

  Gallo, A ^a   Giuberti, G ^a   Masoero, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cereal; Gas production; Particle size; Starch degradation

Indexed keywords

STARCH;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; BOVINE; DIET; DIGESTION; FEMALE; FERMENTATION; HORDEUM; LACTATION; MAIZE; METABOLISM; PARTICLE SIZE; RUMEN; VETERINARY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DIET; DIGESTION; FEMALE; FERMENTATION; HORDEUM; LACTATION; PARTICLE SIZE; RUMEN; STARCH; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84961128418     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10779     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Al-Rabadi G.J., Torley P.J., Williams B.A., Bryden W.L., Gidley M.J. Particle size heterogeneity in milled barley and sorghum grains: Effects on physico-chemical properties and starch digestibility. J. Cereal Sci. 2012, 56:396-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2012.04.009.
2. Al-Rabadi G.J.S., Gilbert R.G., Gidley M.J. Effect of particle size on kinetics of starch digestion in milled barley and sorghum grains by porcine alpha-amylase. J. Cereal Sci. 2009, 50:198-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2009.05.001.
3. Allen M.S. Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:1598-1624. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75030-2.
4. Allen, M. S. 2012. Adjusting concentration and ruminal digestibility of starch through lactation. Pages 24-30 in Proc. Four-State Dairy Nutr. Mgmt. Conf. Dubuque, IA. Dept. Dairy Sci., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison. Accessed Jan. 21, 2016. http://www.livestocktrail.illinois.edu/uploads/dairynet/papers/Adjusting%20Concentration%20Allen.pdf.
5. Anele U.Y., Refat B., Swift M.-L., He Z.X., Zhao Y.L., Mcallister T.A., Yang W.Z. Effects of bulk density, precision processing and processing index on in vitro ruminal fermentation of dry-rolled barley grain. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 195:28-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.06.015.
6. Methods of Determining and Expressing Fineness of Feed Materials by Sieving. Standard no. S319.3 2003, 202-205. ASAE, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
7. Bao Z., Li Y., Zhang J., Li L., Zhang P., Huang F.R. Effect of particle size of wheat on nutrient digestibility, growth performance, and gut microbiota in growing pigs. Livest. Sci. 2016, 183:33-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.11.013.
8. Beauchemin K.A., Mcallister T.A., Dong Y., Farr B.I., Cheng K.J. Effects of mastication on digestion of whole cereal grains by cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 72:236-246.
9. Beauchemin K.A., Yang W.Z., Rode L.M. Effects of barley grain processing on the site and extent of digestion of beef feedlot finishing diets. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79:1925-1936.
10. Blasel H.M., Hoffman P.C., Shaver R.D. Degree of starch access: An enzymatic method to determine starch degradation potential of corn grain and corn silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 128:96-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.018.
11. Callison S.L., Firkins J.L., Eastridge M.L., Hull B.L. Site of nutrient digestion by dairy cows fed corn of different particle sizes or steam-rolled. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84:1458-1467. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70179-8.
12. Chai W.Z., Van Gelder A.H., Cone J.W. Relationship between gas production and starch degradation in feed samples. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004, 114:195-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.11.014.
13. Cone J.W. Degradation of starch in feed concentrates by enzymes, rumen fluid and rumen enzymes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1991, 54:23-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740540104.
14. Cone J.W. The development, use and application of the gas production technique at the DLO Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO), Lelystad, the Netherlands. In Vitro Techniques for Measuring Nutrient Supply to Ruminants. Occasional publication n°22 1998, 65-78. British Society of Animal Science, Penicuik, UK. E.R. Deaville, E. Owen, A.T. Adesogan, C. Rymer, J.A. Huntington, T.L.J. Lawrence (Eds.).
15. Cotanch K.W., Grant R.J., Van Amburgh M.E., Zontini A., Fustini M., Palmonari A., Formigoni A. Applications of uNDF in ration modeling and formulation 2014, 114-131.
16. Crocker L.M., DePeters E.J., Fadel J.G., Perez-Monti H., Taylor S.J., Wyckoff J.A., Zinn R.A. Influence of processed corn grain in diets of dairy cows on digestion of nutrients and milk composition. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81:2394-2407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70131-6.
17. Dehghan-banadaky M., Corbett R., Oba M. Effects of barley grain processing on productivity of cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 137:1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.11.021.
18. DePeters E.J., Getachew G., Fadel J.G., Zinn R.A., Taylor S.J., Pareas J.W., Hinders R.G., Aseltine M.S. In vitro gas production as a method to compare fermentation characteristics of steam-flaked corn. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2003, 105:109-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00042-7.
19. Ferraretto L.F., Crump P.M., Shaver R.D. Effect of cereal grain type and corn grain harvesting and processing methods on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows through a meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96:533-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5932.
20. Firkins J.L., Eastridge M.L., Noftsger S.M. Effects of grain variability and processing on starch utilization by lactating dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79:218-238.
21. Fox D., Tedeschi L., Tylutki T., Russell J.B., Van Amburgh M.E., Chase L.E., Pell A.N., Overton T.R. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004, 112:29-78.
22. Gallo A., Giuberti G., Duval S., Moschini M., Masoero F. Short communication: The effect of an exogenous enzyme with amylolytic activity on gas production and in vitro rumen starch degradability of small and large particles of corn or barley meals. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, In press, 10.3168/jds.2015-9904.
23. Gallo A., Giuberti G., Masoero F., Palmonari A., Fiorentini L., Moschini M. Response on yield and nutritive value of two commercial maize hybrids as a consequence of a water irrigation reduction. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 13:594-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3341.
24. Getachew G., Robinson P.H., DePeters E.J., Taylor S.J. Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004, 111:57-71.
25. Giuberti G., Gallo A., Masoero F., Ferraretto L.F., Hoffman P.C., Shaver R.D. Factors affecting starch utilization in large animal food production system: A review. Starke 2014, 66:72-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/star.201300177.
26. Gozho G.N., Mutsvangwa T. Influence of carbohydrate source on ruminal fermentation characteristics, performance, and microbial protein synthesis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:2726-2735. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0809.
27. Higgs R.J., Chase L.E., Ross D.A., Van Amburgh M.E. Updating the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System feed library and analyzing model sensitivity to feed inputs. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98:6340-6360. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9379.
28. Hindle V.A., Van Vuuren A.M., Klop A., Mathijssen-Kamman A.A., Van Gelder A.H., Cone J.W. Site and extent of starch degradation in the dairy cow-A comparison between in vivo, in situ and in vitro measurements. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.) 2005, 89:158-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00560.x.
29. Hoffman P.C., Mertens D.R., Larson J., Coblentz W.K., Shaver R.D. A query for effective mean particle size in dry and high-moisture corns. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:3467-3477. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5126.
30. Huhtanen P., Seppälä A., Ahvenjärvi S., Rinne M. Prediction of in vivo neutral detergent fiber digestibility and digestion rate of potentially digestible neutral detergent fiber: Comparison of models. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86:2657-2669. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-0894.
31. Huntington G.B. Starch utilization by ruminants: From basics to the bunk. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75:852-867.
32. Joy M.T., DePeters E.J., Fadel J.G., Zinn R.A. Effects of corn processing on the site and extent of digestion in lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80:2087-2097. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76154-X.
33. Knowlton K.F., Glenn B.P., Erdman R.A. Performance, ruminal fermentation, and site of starch digestion in early lactation cows fed corn grain harvested and processed differently. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81:1972-1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75771-6.
34. Krause K.M., Combs D.K. Effects of forage particle size, forage source, and grain fermentability on performance and ruminal pH in midlactation cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86:1382-1397. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73722-9.
35. Krause K.M., Combs D.K., Beauchemin K.A. Effects of forage particle size and grain fermentability in midlactation cows. II. Ruminal pH and chewing activity. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:1947-1957.
36. Lanzas C., Fox D.G., Pell A.N. Digestion kinetics of dried cereal grains. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 136:265-280. a http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.09.004.
37. Lanzas C., Sniffen C.J., Seo S., Tedeschi L.O., Fox D.G. A revised CNCPS feed carbohydrate fractionation scheme for formulating rations for ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 136:167-190. b, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.025.
38. Larsen M., Lund P., Weisbjerg M.R., Hvelplund T. Digestion site of starch from cereals and legumes in lactating dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009, 153:236-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.06.017.
39. Lopez S. In vitro and in situ techniques for estimating digestibility. Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism 2005, 87-121. 2nd ed. J. Dijkstra, J.M. Forbes, J. France (Eds.).
40. Lykos T., Varga G.A. Effects of processing method on degradation characteristics of protein and carbohydrate sources in situ. J. Dairy Sci. 1995, 78:1789-1801.
41. Mathison G.W. Effects of processing on the utilization of grain by cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996, 58:113-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00878-0.
42. Menke K.H., Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 1988, 28:7-55.
43. Moharrery A., Larsen M., Weisbjerg M.R. Starch digestion in the rumen, small intestine, and hind gut of dairy cows-A meta-analysis. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 192:1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.03.001.
44. Nocek J.E., Tamminga S. Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:3598-3629. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78552-4.
45. NorFor-The Nordic Feed Evaluation System 2011, NorFor, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands. 1st.
46. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 2001, NRC, Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC. 7th.
47. Offner A., Bach A., Sauvant D. Quantitative review of in situ starch degradation in the rumen. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2003, 106:81-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00038-5.
48. Offner A., Sauvant D. Prediction of in vivo starch digestion in cattle from in situ data. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004, 111:41-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00216-5.
49. Orskov E.R. The in situ technique for the estimation of the forage degradability in ruminants. Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition 2000, 175-188. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. D.I. Givens, E. Owen, R.F.E. Axford, H.M. Omed (Eds.).
50. Ramos B.M.O., Champion M., Poncet C., Mizubuti I.Y., Nozière P. Effects of vitreousness and particle size of maize grain on ruminal and intestinal in sacco degradation of dry matter, starch and nitrogen. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009, 148:253-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.04.005.
51. Rémond D., Cabrera-Estrada J.I., Champion M., Chauveau B., Coudure R., Poncet C. Effect of corn particle size on site and extent of starch digestion in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:1389-1399. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73288-9.
52. San Emeterio F., Reis R.B., Campos W.E., Satter L.D. Effect of coarse or fine grinding on utilization of dry or ensiled corn by lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:2839-2848. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75184-8.
53. Sveinbjörnsson J., Murphy M., Udén P. In vitro evaluation of starch degradation from feeds with or without various heat treatments. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 132:171-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.03.018.
54. Svihus B., Uhlen A.K., Harstad O.M. Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 122:303-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.02.025.
55. Tagliapietra F., Cattani M., Bailoni L., Schiavon S. In vitro rumen fermentation: Effect of headspace pressure on the gas production kinetics of corn meal and meadow hay. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010, 158:197-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.04.003.
56. Tedeschi L.O., Schofield P., Pell A.N. Determining feed quality for ruminants using in vitro gas production technique. 2. Evaluating different models to assess gas production measurements 2008, 1-15.
57. Tester R.F., Karkalas J., Qi X. Starch structure and digestibility enzyme-substrate relationship. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2004, 60:186-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/WPS200312.
58. Tothi R., Lund P., Weisbjerg M.R., Hvelplund T. Effect of expander processing on fractional rate of maize and barley starch degradation in the rumen of dairy cows estimated using rumen evacuation and in situ techniques. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2003, 104:71-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00292-4.
59. Umucalilar H.D., Coşkun B., Gülşen N. In situ rumen degradation and in vitro gas production of some selected grains from Turkey. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.) 2002, 86:288-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2002.00381.x.
60. Van Amburgh M.E., Collao-Saenz E.A., Higgs R.J., Ross D.A., Recktenwald E.B., Raffrenato E., Chase L.E., Overton T.R., Mills J.K., Foskolos A. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: Updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98:6361-6380. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9378.
61. Wang M., Sun X.Z., Tang S.X., Tan Z.L., Pacheco D. Deriving fractional rate of degradation of logistic-exponential (LE) model to evaluate early in vitro fermentation. Animal 2013, 7:920-929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112002443.
62. Yang W.Z., Oba M., Swift M.L., Mcallister T.A. Short communication: Variation in response to processing, in vitro gas production and fermentation of western Canadian feed barley. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 94:725-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjas-2014-053.
63. Yu P., Huber J.T., Santos F.A.P., Simas J.M., Theurer C.B. Effects of ground, steam-flaked, and steam-rolled corn grains on performance of lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81:777-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75634-6.
64. Zontini A., Foskolos A., Ross D.A., Metcalf J., Doane P.H., Van Amburgh M.E. Research Update: Formulating diets for lactating cattle using multiple pools of NDF digestibility. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf., Dept. Anim. Sci., Cornell Univ. 2015, 189-196.