Prediction of in vivo neutral detergent fiber digestibility and digestion rate of potentially digestible neutral detergent fiber: Comparison of models

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 86, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2657-2669

  Huhtanen, P ^a   Seppala A ^b   Ahvenjarvi S ^b   Rinne, M ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b ANIMAL PRODUCTION RESEARCH   (Finland)

Author keywords

Effective digestion rate; Fiber; Gas production; Mathematical model; Rumen digestion

Indexed keywords

DETERGENT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; DIGESTION; FECES; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SHEEP;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; DETERGENTS; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; DIGESTION; FECES; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SHEEP;

OVIS ARIES;

EID: 54449084630     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-0894     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allen, M. S., and D. R. Mertens. 1988. Evaluating constraints on fiber digestion by rumen microbes. J. Nutr. 118:261-270.
2. Bibby, J., and H. Toutenburg. 1977. Prediction and Improved Estimation of Linear Models. John Wiley & Sons, London, UK.
3. Bossen, D., D. R. Mertens, and M. R. Weisbjerg. 2008. Influence of fermentation method on NDF degradation parameters. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1464-1476.
4. Chaves, A. V., J. L. Burke, G. C. Waghorn, and I. M. Brookes. 2006. Digestion kinetics of leaf, stem and inflorescence from five species of mature grasses. J. Sci. Food Agric. 86:816-825.
5. Cone, J. W., A. H. van Gelder, and F. Driehuis. 1997. Description of gas production profiles with a three-phasic model. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 66:31-45.
6. Cone, J. W., A. H. van Gelder, G. J. W. Visscher, and L. Oudshoorn. 1996. Influence of rumen fluid and substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas production apparatus. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 61:113-128.
7. Danfær, A., P. Huhtanen, P. Udén, J. Sveinbjörnsson, and H. Volden. 2006. Karoline - a Nordic cow model for feed evaluation-model description. Pages 407-415 in Nutrient Digestion and Utilization in Farm Animals: Modelling Approaches. E. Kebreab, J. Dijkstra, A. Bannink, J. Gerrits, and J. France, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
8. Dhanoa, M. S., S. Lopez, J. Dijkstra, D. R. Davies, R. Sanderson, B. A. Williams, Z. Zileshi, and J. France. 2000. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: Comparison of models. Br. J. Nutr. 83:131-142.
9. Ellis, W. C., J. H. Matis, T. M. Hill, and M. R. Murphy. 1994. Methodology for estimating digestion and passage kinetics of forages. Pages 682-756 in Forage Quality, Evaluation and Utilization. G. C. Fahey Jr., M. Colline, D. R. Mertens, and L. E. Moser, ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
10. France, J., M. S. Dhanoa, M. K Theodorou, S. J. Lister, D. R. Davies, and D. Isac. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. J. Theor. Biol. 163:99-111.
11. France, J., J. Dijkstra, M. S. Dhanoa, S. Lopez, and A. Bannink. 2000. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: Derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. Br. J. Nutr. 83:143-150.
12. Groot, J. C. J., J. W. Cone, B. A. Williams, F. M. A. Debersaques, and E. A. Lantinga. 1996. Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 64:77-89.
13. Huhtanen, P., S. Ahvenjärvi, M. R. Weisbjerg, and P. Nørgaard. 2006. Digestion and passage of fibre in ruminants. Pages 87-136 in Ruminant Physiology. K. Sejrsen, T. Hvelpund, and M.O. Nielsen, ed. Wageningen Academic Publishers, the Netherlands.
14. 15N as an internal marker. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 94:29-41.
15. Huhtanen, P., A. Seppälä, M. Ots, S. Ahvenjärvi, and M. Rinne. 2008. In vitro gas production profiles to estimate extent and effective first-order rate of neutral detergent fiber digestion in the rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 86:651-669.
16. Huhtanen, P., A. Vanhatalo, and T. Varvikko. 1998. Enzyme activities of rumen particles and feed samples incubated in situ with differing types of cloth. Br. J. Nutr. 79:161-168.
17. Lund, P., M. R. Weisbjerg, and T. Hvelplund. 2006. Passage kinetics of fibre in dairy cows obtained from duodenal and faecal ytterbium excretion: Effect of forage type. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 128:229-252.
18. Mertens, D. R. 1993a. Rate and extent of digestion. Pages 13-60 in Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. J. M. Forbes and J. France, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
19. Mertens, D. R. 1993b. Kinetics of cell wall digestion and passage in ruminants. Pages 535-570 in Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility. H. G. Jung, D. R. Burton, R. D. Hatfield, and J. Ralph, ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
20. Nousiainen, J., M. Rinne, M. Hellämäki, and P. Huhtanen. 2003a. Prediction of the digestibility of the primary growth of grass silages harvested at different stages of maturity from chemical composition and pepsin-cellulase solubility. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 103:97-111.
21. Nousiainen, J., M. Rinne, M. Hellämäki, and P. Huhtanen. 2003b. Prediction of the digestibility of primary growth and regrowth grass silages from chemical composition, pepsin-cellulase solubility and indigestible cell wall content. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 110:61-74.
22. Nozière, P., and B. Michalet-Doreau. 1996. Validation of in sacco method: Influence of sampling site, nylon bag or rumen contents, on fibrolytic activity of solid-associated microorganisms. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 57:203-210.
23. Ørskov, E. R., and I. McDonald. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 92:499-503.
24. Pitt, R. E., T. L. Cross, A. N. Pell, P. Schofield, and P. H. Doane. 1999. Use of in vitro gas production models in ruminal kinetics. Math. Biosci. 159:145-163.
25. Pond, K. R., W. C. Ellis, J. H. Matis, H. M. Ferreiro, and J. D. Sutton. 1988. Compartment models for estimating attributes of digesta flow in cattle. Br. J. Nutr. 60:571-595.
26. Rinne, M., A. Olt, J. Nousiainen, A. Seppälä, M. Tuori, C. Paul, M. D. Fraser, and P. Huhtanen. 2006. Prediction of legume silage digestibility from various laboratory methods. Grass Forage Sci. 61:354-362.
27. Ross, S. 1976. A First Course in Probability. Macmillan, New York, NY.
28. Schofield, P. 2000. Gas production methods. Pages 209-232 in Farm Animal Metabolism and Nutrition. J. P. F. D'Mello, ed. CAB International, Oxon, UK.
29. Schofield, P., R. E. Pitt, and A. N. Pell. 1994. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2980-2991.
30. Schofield, P., and A. N. Pell. 1995. Validity of using accumulated gas pressure readings to measure forage digestion in vitro: A comparison involving three forages. J. Dairy Sci. 78:2230-2238.
31. Van Soest, P. J., M. E. Van Amburgh, J. B. Robertson, and W. F. Knaus. 2005. Validation of the 2.4 times lignin factor for ultimate extent of NDF digestion, and curve peeling rate of fermentation curves into pools. Pages 139-149 in Proc. Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, East Syracuse, NY. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.