Deriving fractional rate of degradation of logistic-exponential (LE) model to evaluate early in vitro fermentation

Animal

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 920-929

  Wang, M ^a   Sun, X Z ^b   Tang, S X ^a   Tan, Z L ^b,c   Pacheco, D ^b  

^a Institute of Subtropical Agriculture   (China)

^b AGRESEARCH GRASSLANDS   (New Zealand)

^c INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

In vitro fermentation; Logistic exponential model; Mathematical models; Rate of gas production

Indexed keywords

METHANE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FERMENTATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; FERMENTATION; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; METHANE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84877139053     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112002443     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Calabrò S, López S, Piccolo V, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa MS and France J 2005. Comparative analysis of gas production profiles obtained with buffalo and sheep ruminal fluid as the source of inoculum. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123-124, 51-65.
2. Chai WZ, Van Gelder AH and Cone JW 2004. Relationship between gas production and starch degradation in feed samples. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114, 195-204.
3. Colombatto D, Mould FL, Bhat MK, Morgavi DP, Beauchemin KA and Owen E 2003. Influence of fibrolytic enzymes on the hydrolysis and fermentation of pure cellulose and xylan by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1040-1050.
4. Cone JW and Becker PM 2012. Fermentation kinetics and production of volatile fatty acids and microbial protein by starchy feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 172, 34-41.
5. Cone JW and van Gelder AH 1999. Influence of protein fermentation on gas production profiles. Animal Feed Science and Technology 76, 251-264.
6. Cone JW, Van Gelder AH and Driehuis F 1997. Description of gas profiles with a three phasic model. Animal Feed Science and Technology 66, 31-45.
7. Dhanoa MS, López S, Dijkstra J, Davies DR, Sanderson R, Williams BA, Sileshi Z and France J 2000. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: comparison of models. British Journal of Nutrition 83, 131-142.
8. Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Bannink A, France J and López S 2005. Application of the gas production technique to feed evaluation systems for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123-124, 561-578.
9. France J, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa MS, Lpez S and Bannink A 2000. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. British Journal of Nutrition 83, 143-150.
10. France J, Dhanoa MS, Theodorou MK, Lister SJ, Davies DR and Isac D 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. Journal of Theoretical Biology 163, 99-111.
11. France J, López S, Kebreab E, Bannink A, Dhanoa MS and Dijkstra J 2005. A general compartmental model for interpreting gas production profiles. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123-124, 473-485.
12. Groot JCJ, Cone JW, Williams BA, Debersaques FMA and Lantinga EA 1996. Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 64, 77-89.
13. Jalilvand G, Odongo NE, Lopez S, Naserian A, Valizadeh R, Shahrodi FE, Kebreab E and France J 2008. Effects of different levels of an enzyme mixture on in vitro gas production parameters of contrasting forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 146, 289-301.
14. López S, France J, Dhanoa MS, Mould F and Dijkstra J 1999. Comparison of mathematical models to describe disappearance curves obtained using the polyester bag technique for incubating feeds in the rumen. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1875-1888.
15. López S, Dhanoa MS, Dijkstra J, Bannink A, Kebreab E and France J 2007. Some methodological and analytical considerations regarding application of the gas production technique. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135, 139-156.
16. Mauricio RM, Owen E, Mould FL, Givens I, Theodorou MK, France J, Davies DR and Dhanoa MS 2001. Comparison of bovine rumen liquor and bovine faeces as inoculum for an in vitro gas production technique for evaluating forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 89, 33-48.
17. Muetzel S, Hunt CL and Tavendale MH 2011. Brief communication: evaluating rumen fluid from sheep and cattle as inoculum in a newly developed automated in vitro rumen batch culture system. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 71, 240-242.
18. Murray J, Longland A and Moore-Colyer M 2006. In vitro fermentation of different ratios of high-temperature dried lucerne and sugar beet pulp incubated with an equine faecal inoculum. Animal Feed Science and Technology 129, 89-98.
19. Murray J, Longland A and Dunnett C 2008. Effect of yeast supplementation on the in vitro fermentation of high-temperature dried lucerne incubated with an equine faecal inoculum. Animal Feed Science and Technology 146, 149-159.
20. Oshita T, Sudo K, Nonaka S and Ochiai K 2008. The efffect of the feed regimen on chewing time, digesta passage rate and particle size distribution in Holstein non-lactating cows fed pasture ad libitum. Livestock Science 113, 243-250.
21. Schofield P, Pitt RE and Pell AN 1994. Kinetics of fibre digestion from in vitro gas production. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2980-2991.
22. Sherrod PH 1995. NLREG: Nonlinear Regression Analysis Program. Brentwood, TN, USA. Available at http://www.nlreg.com.
23. Sun XZ, Hoskin SO, Muetzel S, Molano G and Clark H 2011. Effect of forage chicory (Cichorium intybus) and Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) on methane emissions in vitro and from sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166-167, 391-397.
24. Tang S, Tan Z, Zhou C, Jiang H, Jiang Y and Sheng L 2006. A comparison of in vitro fermentation characteristics of different botanical fractions of mature maize stover. Journal of Animal and Feed Science 15, 505-515.
25. Tang SX, Jiang HL, Zhou CS and Tan ZL 2005. Effects of different forage species on in vitro gas production characteristics. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 14, 72-77.
26. Tang SX, Tayo GO, Tan ZL, Sun ZH, Wang M, Ren GP and Han XF 2008. Use of in vitro gas production technique to investigate interactions between rice straw, wheat straw, maize stover and alfalfa or clover. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 21, 1278-1285.
27. Wang M, Tang SX and Tan ZL 2011. Modeling in vitro gas production kinetics: derivation of Logistic-Exponential (LE) equations and comparison of models. Animal Feed Science and Technology 165, 137-150.