HoxD expression in the fin-fold compartment of basal gnathostomes and implications for paired appendage evolution

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Tulenko, Frank J ^a   Augustus, Gaius J ^a,b   Massey, James L ^a,c   Sims, Seth E ^a   Mazan, Sylvie ^d   Davis, Marcus C ^a  

^a KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DERMIS; DIFFERENTIATION; DNA FLANKING REGION; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NESTING; PADDLEFISH; SCYLIORHINUS CANICULA; SKELETON; THINKING; ANIMAL; BIOSYNTHESIS; DNA SEQUENCE; EMBRYOLOGY; FIN (ORGAN); FISH; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION;

HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN;

ANIMAL FINS; ANIMALS; FISHES; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84960443135     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep22720     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Duboule, D. & Dolle, P. The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. EMBO J. 8, 1497-1505 (1989).
2. Graham, A., Papalopulu, N. & Krumlauf, R. The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell 57, 367-378 (1989).
3. Burke, A. C., Nelson, C. E., Morgan, B. A. & Tabin, C. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 121, 333-46 (1995).
4. Cohn, M. J. & Tickle, C. Developmental basis of limblessness and axial patterning in snakes. Nature 399, 474-479 (1999).
5. Duboule, D. The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters. Development 134, 2549-2560 (2007).
6. Freitas, R., GuangJun, Z. & Cohn, M. J. Evidence that mechanisms of fin development evolved in the midline of early verterbates. Nature 442, 1033-1037 (2006).
7. Head, J. H. & Polly, P. D. Evolution of the snake body form reveals homoplasy in amniote gene function. Nature. 520, 86-89 (2015).
8. Pascual-Anaya, J., D'Aniello, S., Kuratani, S. & Garcia-Fernandez, J. Evolution of Hox gene clusters in deuterostomes. BMC Dev. Biol. 13, 26 (2013).
9. Mehta, T. K. et al. Evidence for at least six Hox clusters in the Japanese lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16044-16049 (2013).
10. Chambers, K. E. et al. Hox cluster duplication in the basal teleost Hiodon alosoides (Osteoglossomorpha). Theory Biosci. 128, 109-120 (2009).
11. Kuraku, S. & Meyer, A. The evolution and maintenance of Hox gene clusters in vertebrates and the teleost-specific genome duplication. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 53, 765-773 (2009).
12. Mungpakdee, S. et al. Differential evolution of the 13 Atlantic salmon Hox clusters. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1333-1343 (2008).
13. Crow, K. D., Smith, C. D., Cheng, J. F., Wagner, G. P. & Amemiya, C. T. An independent genome duplication from Hox paralogs in the American paddlefish - a representative basal ray-finned fish and important comparative reference. Genome Biol. Evol. 4, 937-953 (2012).
14. Kuraku, S. et al. 2008. Noncanonical role of Hox14 revealed by its expression patterns in lamprey and shark. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6679-6683 (2008).
15. Powers, T. P. & Amemiya, C. T. Evidence for a Hox14 paralog group in vertebrates. Curr. Biol. 14, R183-R184 (2004).
16. Lee, A. P., Koh, E. G., Tay, A., Brenner, S. & Venkatesh, B. Highly conserved syntenic blocks at the vertebrate Hox loci and conserved regulatory elements within and outside Hox gene clusters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6994-6999 (2006).
17. Schneider, I. & Shubin, N. The origin of the tetrapod limb: from expeditions to enhancers. Trends Genet. 29, 419-426 (2013).
18. Davis, M. C. The Deep Homology of the Autopod: Insights from Hox Gene Regulation. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2, 224-232 (2013).
19. Shubin, N. H. & Davis, M. C. in Modularity in development and evolution (eds Schlosser, G. & Wagner, G.) Ch. 19, 429-440 (University of Chicago Press, 2004).
20. Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B. & Jenkins, F. A. Jr. The pectoral fin of Tiktaalik roseae and the origin of the tetrapod limb. Nature 440, 764-771 (2006).
21. Sordino, P., van der Hoeven, F. & Duboule, D. Hox gene expression in teleost fins and the origin of vertebrate digits. Nature 375, 678-681 (1995).
22. Davis, M. C., Dahn, R. D. & Shubin, N. H. An autopodial-like pattern of Hox expression in the fins of a basal actinopterygian fish. Nature 447, 473-476. (2007).
23. Freitas, R., Zhang, G. & Cohn, M. J. Biphasic Hoxd gene expression in shark paired fins reveals an ancient origin of the distal limb domain. PLoS ONE 15, e754 (2007).
24. Ahn, D. & Ho, R. K. Tri-phasic expression of posterior Hox genes during development of pectoral fins in zebrafish: implications for the evolution of vertebrate paired appendages. Dev. Biol. 322, 220-233 (2008).
25. Schneider, I. et al. Appendage expression driven by the Hoxd Global Control Region is an ancient gnathostome feature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12782-12786 (2011).
26. Freitas, R., Gomez-Marin, C., Wilson, J. M., Casares, F. & Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L. Hoxd13 contribution to the evolution of vertebrate appendages. Dev Cell. 23, 1219-1229 (2012).
27. Sheth, R. et al. Hox genes regulate digit patterning by controlling the wavelength of a turing-type mechanism. Science 338, 1476-1480 (2012).
28. Woltering, J. M., Noordermeer, D., Leleu, M. & Duboule, D. Conservation and divergence of regulatory strategies at Hox Loci and the origin of tetrapod digits. PLoS Biol 12, e1001773 (2014).
29. Gehrke, A. R. et al. Deep conservation of wrist and digit enhancers in fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 803-808 (2015).
30. Nelson, C. E. et al. Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. Development 122, 1449-1466 (1996).
31. Spitz, F. & Duboule, D. Global control regions and regulatory landscapes in vertebrate development and evolution. Adv. Genet. 61, 175-205 (2008).
32. Andrey, G. & Duboule, D. SnapShot: Hox gene regulation. Cell 156, 856.e1 (2014).
33. Tarchini, B. & Duboule, D. Control of Hoxd genes' collinearity during early limb development. Dev. Cell 10, 93-103 (2006).
34. Andrey, G. et al. A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 340, 1234167 (2013).
35. Spitz, F., Gonzalez, F. & Duboule, D. A global control region defines a chromosomal regulatory landscape containing the HoxD cluster. Cell 113, 405-417 (2003).
36. Gonzalez, F., Duboule, D. & Spitz, F. Transgenic analysis of Hoxd gene regulation during digit development. Dev. Biol. 306, 847-859 (2007).
37. Montavon, T. et al. A regulatory archipelago controls Hox genes transcription in digits. Cell 147, 1132-1145 (2011).
38. Woltering, J. M. & Duboule, D. The origin of digits: Expression patterns versus regulatory mechanism. Dev. Cell 18, 526-532 (2010).
39. Takamatsu, N. et al. Duplicated Abd-B class genes in medaka hoxAa and hoxAb clusters exhibit differential expression patterns in pectoral fin buds. Dev. Genes Evol. 217, 263-273 (2007).
40. Johanson, Z. et al. Fish fingers: digit homologues in sarcopterygian fish fins. J. Exp. Zool. B. Mol. Dev. Evol. 308, 757-68 (2007).
41. Sakamoto, K. et al. Heterochronic shift in Hox-mediated activation of sonic hedgehog leads to morphological changes during fin development. PLoS One 4, e5121 (2009).
42. O'Shaughnessy, K. L., Dahn, R. D. & Cohn, M. J. Molecular development of chondrichthyan claspers and the evolution of copulatory organs. Nat Commun. Apr 14;6:6698. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7698 (2015).
43. Shubin, N., Tabin, C. & Carroll, S. Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388, 639-648 (1997).
44. Shubin, N., Tabin, C. & Carroll, S. Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature 457, 818-823 (2009).
45. Freitas, R., Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L. & Rodrigues, P. N. New frontiers in the evolution of fin development. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol. 322B, 540-552 (2014).
46. Amemiya, C. T. et al. The African coelacanth genome provides insight into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496, 311-316 (2013).
47. Feiner, N., Ericsson, R., Meyer, A. & Kuraku, S. Revisiting the origin of the vertebrate Hox14 by including its relict sarcopterygian members. J. Exp. Zool. B. Mol. Dev. Evol. 316, 515-25 (2011).
48. Zhang, J. et al. Loss of fish actinotrichia proteins and the fin-to-limb transition. Nature 466, 234-237 (2010).
49. Davis, M. C., Shubin, N. H. & Force, A. Pectoral fin and girdle development in the basal actinopterygians Polyodon spathula and Acipenser transmontanus. J. Morph. 262, 608-628 (2004).
50. Mabee, P. M. & Noordsy, M. Development of the paired fins in the paddlefish, Polyodon spathula. J. Morphol. 261, 334-344 (2004).
51. SantaMaria, J. A., Santos, R. L. & Becerra, J. An antiserum against ceratotrichia (selachian) recognizes actinotrichia in teleost regenerating fins. Int. J. Dev. Biol. Suppl 1, 175S-176S (1996).
52. Dahn, R. D., Davis, M. C., Pappano, W. N. & Shubin, N. H. Sonic hedgehog function in chondrichthyan fins and the evolution of appendage patterning. Nature 445, 311-314 (2007).
53. Zakany, J., Kmita, M. & Duboule, D. A dual role for Hox genes in limb anterior-posterior asymmetry. Science 304, 1669-1672 (2004).
54. Kmita, M. et al. Early developmental arrest of mammalian limbs lacking HoxA/HoxD gene function. Nature 435, 1113-1116 (2005).
55. Tarchini, B., Dubuole, D. & Kmita, M. Regulatory constraints in the evolution of the tetrapod limb anterior-posterior polarity. Nature 443, 985-988 (2006).
56. Davis, A. P., Witte, D. P., Hsieh-Li, H. M., Potter, S. S. & Capecchi, M. R. Absence of radius and ulna in mice lacking hoxa-11 and hoxd-11. Nature 375, 791-795 (1995).
57. Fromental-Ramain, C. et al. Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 play a crucial role in the patterning of the limb autopod. Development 122, 2997-3011 (1996).
58. Fromental-Ramain, C. et al. Specific and redundant functions of the paralogous Hoxa-9 and Hoxd-9 genes in forelimb and axial skeleton patterning. Development. 122, 461-472 (1996).
59. Wellik, D. M. & Capecchi, M. R. Hox10 and Hox11 genes are required to globally pattern the mammalian skeleton. Science 301, 363-367 (2003).
60. Boulet, A. M. & Capecchi, M. R. Multiple roles of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 in the formation of the mammalian forlimp zeugopod. Development 131, 299-309 (2004).
61. Zakany, J. & Duboule, D. The role of Hox genes during vertebrate limb development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17, 359-366 (2007).
62. Swinehart, I. T., Schlientz, A. J., Quintanilla, C. S., Mortlock, D. P. & Wellik, D. M. Hox11 genes are required for regional patterning and integration of muscle tendon and bone. Development 140, 4574-4582 (2013).
63. Bemis, W. E. & Grande, L. Early development of the actinopterygian head. I. External development and staging of the paddlefish Polyodon spathula. J. Morphol. 213, 47-83 (1992).
64. Ballard, W. W. & Needham, R. G. Normal embryonic stages of Polyodon spathula (Walbaum). J. Morphol. 114, 465-477 (1964).
65. Ballard, W. W., Mellinger, J. & Lechenault, H. A series of normal stages for development of scyliorhinus-canicula, the lesser spotted dogfish (Chondrichthyes, Scyliorhinidae). J. Exp. Zool. 267, 318-336 (1993).
66. Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature biotechnology 29, 644-652 (2011).
67. Modrell, M. S., Bemis, W. E., Northcutt, R. G., Davis, M. C. & Baker, C. V. H. Electrosensory ampullary organs are derived from lateral line placodes in bony fishes. Nat. Commun. 2, 496 (2011).