Eèidence for at least six Hox clusters in the Japanese lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum)

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 40, 2013, Pages 16044-16049

  Mehta, Tarang K ^a,b   Raèi, Èydianathan ^a   Yamasaki, Shinichi ^c   Lee, Alison P ^a   Lian, Michelle M ^a   Tay, Boon Hui ^a   Tohari, Sumanty ^a   Yanai, Seiji ^d   Tay, Alice ^a   Brenner, Sydney ^a,c   Èenkatesh, Byrappa ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c OKINAWA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d ISHIKAWA PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COELACANTH; ELEPHANT; ENHANCER REGION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME; HOX GENE; HUMAN; LAMPREY; LETHENTERON JAPONICUM; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHARK; STICKLEBACK; ZEBRA FISH; ANIMAL; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HOMEOBOX; JAPAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOMES, ARTIFICIAL, BACTERIAL; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, HOMEOBOX; JAPAN; LAMPREYS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MULTIGENE FAMILY; REGULATORY SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84885078508     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1315760110     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Carroll SB, Weatherbee SD, Langeland JA (1995) Homeotic genes and the regulation and evolution of insect wing number. Nature 375(6526):58-61.
2. Holland PW, Garcia-Fernàndez J (1996) Hox genes and chordate evolution. Dev Biol 173(2):382-395.
3. Wagner GP, Amemiya C, Ruddle F (2003) Hox cluster duplications and the opportunity for evolutionary novelties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(25):14603-14606.
4. Duboule D (2007) The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters. Development 134(14): 2549-2560.
5. Amemiya CT, et al. (2010) Complete HOX cluster characterization of the coelacanth provides further evidence for slow evolution of its genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(8):3622-3627.
6. Putnam NH, et al. (2008) The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature 453(7198):1064-1071.
7. Kuraku S, Meyer A (2009) The evolution and maintenance of Hox gene clusters in vertebrates and the teleost-specific genome duplication. Int J Dev Biol 53(5-6):765-773.
8. Mungpakdee S, et al. (2008) Differential evolution of the 13 Atlantic salmon Hox clusters. Mol Biol Evol 25(7):1333-1343.
9. Duboule D, Dollé P (1989) The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. EMBO J 8(5):1497-1505.
10. Gaunt SJ, Sharpe PT, Duboule D (1988) Spatially restricted domains of homeo-gene transcripts in mouse embryos: Relation to a segmented body plan. Development 104(Supplement):169-179.
11. Graham A, Papalopulu N, Krumlauf R (1989) The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell 57(3):367-378.
12. Izpisúa-Belmonte JC, Falkenstein H, Dollé P, Renucci A, Duboule D (1991) Murine genes related to the Drosophila AbdB homeotic genes are sequentially expressed during development of the posterior part of the body. EMBO J 10(8):2279-2289.
13. Pancer Z, et al. (2004) Somatic diversification of variable lymphocyte receptors in the agnathan sea lamprey. Nature 430(6996):174-180.
14. Stadler PF, et al. (2004) Evidence for independent Hox gene duplications in the hagfish lineage: A PCR-based gene inventory of Eptatretus stoutii. Mol Phylogenet Evol 32(3):686-694.
15. Irvine SQ, et al. (2002) Genomic analysis of Hox clusters in the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus. J Exp Zool 294(1):47-62.
16. Force A, Amores A, Postlethwait JH (2002) Hox cluster organization in the jawless vertebrate Petromyzon marinus. J Exp Zool 294(1):30-46.
17. Takio Y, et al. (2004) Evolutionary biology: Lamprey Hox genes and the evolution of jaws. Nature 429(6989):1 p following 262.
18. Takio Y, et al. (2007) Hox gene expression patterns in Lethenteron japonicum embryos- insights into the evolution of the vertebrate Hox code. Dev Biol 308(2):606-620.
19. Smith JJ, Antonacci F, Eichler EE, Amemiya CT (2009) Programmed loss of millions of base pairs from a vertebrate genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(27):11212-11217.
20. Fried C, Prohaska SJ, Stadler PF (2003) Independent Hox-cluster duplications in lampreys. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol 299(1):18-25.
21. Qiu H, Hildebrand F, Kuraku S, Meyer A (2011) Unresolved orthology and peculiar coding sequence properties of lamprey genes: The KCNA gene family as test case. BMC Genomics 12:325.
22. Smith JJ, et al. (2013) Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution. Nat Genet 45(4):415-421, e1-e2.
23. Kuraku S, Kuratani S (2006) Time scale for cyclostome evolution inferred with a phylogenetic diagnosis of hagfish and lamprey cDNA sequences. Zoolog Sci 23(12):1053-1064.
24. Kuraku S, et al. (2008) Noncanonical role of Hox14 revealed by its expression patterns in lamprey and shark. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(18):6679-6683.
25. Amemiya CT, et al. (2008) The amphioxus Hox cluster: Characterization, comparative genomics, and evolution. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol 310(5):465-477.
26. Ravi V, et al. (2009) Elephant shark (Callorhinchusmilii) provides insights into the evolution of Hox gene clusters in gnathostomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(38):16327-16332.
27. Thisse B, Thisse C (2005) High throughput expression analysis of ZF-models consortium clones. ZFIN Direct Data Submission (http://zfin.org).
28. Davis AP, Capecchi MR (1996) A mutational analysis of the 5' HoxD genes: Dissection of genetic interactions during limb development in the mouse. Development 122(4): 1175-1185.
29. Kondo T, Dollé P, Zákány J, Duboule D (1996) Function of posterior HoxD genes in the morphogenesis of the anal sphincter. Development 122(9):2651-2659.
30. Pennacchio LA, et al. (2006) In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences. Nature 444(7118):499-502.
31. Woolfe A, et al. (2005) Highly conserved non-coding sequences are associated with vertebrate development. PLoS Biol 3(1):e7.
32. Brudno M, et al.; NISC Comparative Sequencing Program (2003) LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: Efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Res 13(4):721-731.
33. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I (2004) VISTA: Computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 32(Web Server issue):W273-279.
34. Thisse B, Thisse C (2004) Fast release clones: A high throughput expression analysis. ZFIN Direct Data Submission (http://zfin.org).
35. Crow KD, Smith CD, Cheng JF, Wagner GP, Amemiya CT (2012) An independent genome duplication inferred fromHox paralogs in theAmerican paddlefish-a representative basal ray-finned fish and important comparative reference. Genome Biol Evol 4(9):937-953.
36. Kuraku S, Meyer A, Kuratani S (2009) Timing of genome duplications relative to the origin of the vertebrates: Did cyclostomes diverge before or after? Mol Biol Evol 26(1): 47-59.
37. Verde I, et al.; International Peach Genome Initiative (2013) The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat Genet 45(5):487-494.
38. Sievers F, et al. (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539.
39. Hubisz MJ, Pollard KS, Siepel A (2011) PHAST and RPHAST: Phylogenetic analysis with space/time models. Brief Bioinform 12(1):41-51.