Deep conservation of wrist and digit enhancers in fish

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 803-808

  Gehrke, Andrew R ^a   Schneider, Igor ^b   De La Calle Mustienes, Elisa ^c   Tena, Juan J ^c   Gomez Marin, Carlos ^c   Chandran, Mayuri ^a   Nakamura, Tetsuya ^a   Braasch, Ingo ^d   Postlethwait, John H ^d   Gómez Skarmeta, José Luis ^c   Shubin, Neil H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARÁ   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Autopod; Development; Evolution; Gene regulation; Hox

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONSERVATION GENETICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA FOOTPRINTING; EMBRYO; ENHANCER REGION; EPIGENETICS; EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; FIN (ORGAN); FINGER; FISH; FISH GENETICS; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENOME; HOX GENE; HOXA GENE; HOXD GENE; LEPISOSTEUS OCULATUS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPORTER GENE; TELEOST; TRANSGENIC FISH; TRANSGENIC MOUSE; TRANSGENIC ZEBRAFISH; WRIST; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HOMEOBOX;

DANIO RERIO; LEPISOSTEUS OCULATUS; MURINAE; OSTEICHTHYES; PISCES; TELEOSTEI; TETRAPODA;

ANIMALS; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; FISHES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENES, HOMEOBOX; MICE;

EID: 84921395685     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1420208112     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wagner GP (2014) Homology, Genes, and Evolutionary Innovation (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton), pp 327-384.
2. Shubin NH, Daeschler EB, Jenkins FA, Jr (2006) The pectoral fin of Tiktaalik roseae and the origin of the tetrapod limb. Nature 440(7085):764-771.
3. Schneider I, Shubin NH (2013) The origin of the tetrapod limb: From expeditions to enhancers. Trends Genet 29(7):419-426.
4. Montavon T, Duboule D (2013) Chromatin organization and global regulation of Hox gene clusters. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368(1620):20120367.
5. Zakany J, Duboule D (2007) The role of Hox genes during vertebrate limb development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17(4):359-366.
6. Montavon T, et al. (2011) A regulatory archipelago controls Hox genes transcription in digits. Cell 147(5):1132-1145.
7. Andrey G, et al. (2013) A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 340(6137):1234167.
8. Berlivet S, et al. (2013) Clustering of tissue-specific sub-TADs accompanies the regulation of HoxA genes in developing limbs. PLoS Genet 9(12):e1004018.
9. Schneider I, et al. (2011) Appendage expression driven by the Hoxd Global Control Region is an ancient gnathostome feature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(31): 12782-12786.
10. Woltering JM, Noordermeer D, Leleu M, Duboule D (2014) Conservation and divergence of regulatory strategies at Hox Loci and the origin of tetrapod digits. PLoS Biol 12(1):e1001773.
11. Braasch I, et al. (2014) A new model army: Emerging fish models to study the genomics of vertebrate Evo-Devo. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol, 10.1002/jez.b.22589.
12. Taylor JS, Braasch I, Frickey T, Meyer A, Van de Peer Y (2003) Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res 13(3):382-390.
13. Amores A, et al. (1998) Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282(5394):1711-1714.
14. Amores A, Catchen J, Ferrara A, Fontenot Q, Postlethwait JH (2011) Genome evolution and meiotic maps by massively parallel DNA sequencing: Spotted gar, an outgroup for the teleost genome duplication. Genetics 188(4):799-808.
15. Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ (2013) Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNAbinding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods 10(12):1213-1218.
16. Lara-Astiaso D, et al. (2014) Immunogenetics. Chromatin state dynamics during blood formation. Science 345(6199):943-949.
17. Fisher S, et al. (2006) Evaluating the biological relevance of putative enhancers using Tol2 transposon-mediated transgenesis in zebrafish. Nat Protoc 1(3):1297-1305.
18. Chiang C, et al. (2001) Manifestation of the limb prepattern: Limb development in the absence of sonic hedgehog function. Dev Biol 236(2):421-435.
19. Litingtung Y, Dahn RD, Li Y, Fallon JF, Chiang C (2002) Shh and Gli3 are dispensable for limb skeleton formation but regulate digit number and identity. Nature 418(6901): 979-983.
20. Ahn D, Ho RK (2008) Tri-phasic expression of posterior Hox genes during development of pectoral fins in zebrafish: Implications for the evolution of vertebrate paired appendages. Dev Biol 322(1):220-233.
21. Gonzalez F, Duboule D, Spitz F (2007) Transgenic analysis of Hoxd gene regulation during digit development. Dev Biol 306(2):847-859.
22. Freitas R, Gómez-Marín C, Wilson JM, Casares F, Gómez-Skarmeta JL (2012) Hoxd13 contribution to the evolution of vertebrate appendages. Dev Cell 23(6):1219-1229.
23. Force A, et al. (1999) Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151(4):1531-1545.
24. Bessa J, et al. (2009) Zebrafish enhancer detection (ZED) vector: A new tool to facilitate transgenesis and the functional analysis of cis-regulatory regions in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 238(9):2409-2417.
25. Kawakami K, Shima A, Kawakami N (2000) Identification of a functional transposase of the Tol2 element, an Ac-like element from the Japanese medaka fish, and its transposition in the zebrafish germ lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(21):11403-11408.
26. Suster ML, Abe G, Schouw A, Kawakami K (2011) Transposon-mediated BAC transgenesis in zebrafish. Nat Protoc 6(12):1998-2021.
27. Thisse C, Thisse B, Postlethwait JH (1995) Expression of snail2, a second member of the zebrafish snail family, in cephalic mesendoderm and presumptive neural crest of wildtype and spadetail mutant embryos. Dev Biol 172(1):86-99.
28. Zhang Y, et al. (2008) Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9(9):R137.
29. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N (2002) Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295(5558):1306-1311.
30. Hagège H, et al. (2007) Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3C-qPCR). Nat Protoc 2(7):1722-1733.
31. Noordermeer D, et al. (2011) The dynamic architecture of Hox gene clusters. Science 334(6053):222-225.
32. Splinter E, de Wit E, van de Werken HJ, Klous P, de Laat W (2012) Determining longrange chromatin interactions for selected genomic sites using 4C-seq technology: From fixation to computation. Methods 58(3):221-230.