Supporting Second Language Writing Using Multimodal Feedback

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 58-74

  Elola, Idoia ^a   Oskoz, Ana ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

Instructor feedback; L2 writing; Learner beliefs; Revisions; Written and oral feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960328735     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: 19449720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/flan.12183     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Arndt, V. ( 1993). Response to writing: Using feedback to inform the writing process. In M. Brock & L. Walters (Eds.), Teaching composition around the Pacific Rim: Politics and pedagogy (pp. 90-116). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
2. Basharina, O. K. ( 2007). An activity theory perspective on student-report contradictions in international telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology, 11, 82-103.
3. Bernat, E., & Gvozdenko, I. ( 2005). Beliefs about language learning: Current knowledge, pedagogical implications, and new research directions. TESL-EJ, 9 [Electronic version]. Retrieved June 15, 2015, from http://tesl-ej.org/ej33/a1.html
4. Bitchener, J. ( 2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.
5. Bitchener, J. ( 2012). A reflection on "the language learning potential" of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348-363.
6. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. ( 2010). Raising linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 207-217.
7. Blin, F., & Appel, C. ( 2011). Computer supported collaborative writing in practice: An activity theoretical study. CALICO Journal, 28, 473-497.
8. Chandler, J. ( 2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
9. Conrad, S. M., & Goldstein, L. M. ( 1999). ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, context, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 147-179.
10. Crystal, D. ( 2006). Language and the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Ducate, L., & Arnold, D. ( 2012). Computer-mediated feedback: Effectiveness and students' perceptions of screen-casting software vs the comment function. In G. Kessler, A. Oskoz, & I. Elola (Eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (CALICO Monograph Series Vol. 10, pp. 31-55). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
12. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. ( 2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.
13. Elola, I. ( 2005). The complexity of revision in the foreign language classroom and the creation of a FL revision model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, Iowa City.
14. Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. ( 2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 30-49.
15. Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. ( 2014). Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL composition. System, 46, 80-95.
16. Engeström, Y. ( 1991). Developmental work research: Reconstructing expertise through expansive learning. In M. I. Nurminen & G. R. S. Weir (Eds.), Human jobs and computer interfaces (pp. 265-290). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
17. Engeström, Y. ( 1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Farrokhi, F., & Sattarpour, S. ( 2012). The effects of direct written corrective feedback on improvement of grammatical accuracy of high-proficient L2 learners. World Journal of Education, 2, 49-57.
19. Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. ( 2002). Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19, 279-294.
20. Ferris, D. R. ( 1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.
21. Ferris, D. R. ( 1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
22. Ferris, D. R. ( 1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-10.
23. Ferris, D. R. ( 2001). Teaching writing for academic purposes. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 298-314). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Ferris, D. R. ( 2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 81-104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Ferris, D. R. ( 2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181-201.
26. Ferris, D. R. ( 2012). Technology and corrective feedback for L2 writers: Principles, practices, and problems. In G. Kessler, A. Oskoz, & I. Elola (Eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (CALICO Monograph Series Vol. 10, pp. 7-29). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
27. Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. ( 2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 307-329.
28. Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. ( 2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.
29. Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. ( 2006). Computer-mediated language learning: Making meaning in multimodal virtual learning spaces. The JALT CALL Journal, 2, 3-18.
30. Haneda, M. ( 2004). The joint construction of meaning in writing conferences. Applied Linguistics, 25, 178-219.
31. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. ( 1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163.
32. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. ( 1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert response in L2 writing. Modern Language Journal, 80, 287-308.
33. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. ( 2012). Exploring the learning potential of writing development in heritage learning potential of L2 writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 209-236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34. Ho, M., & Savignon, S. ( 2007). Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal, 24, 269-290.
35. Hyland, F. ( 2001). Providing effective support: Investigating feedback to distance language learners. Open Learning, 16, 233-247.
36. Kaptelinin, V., Kuutti, K., & Bannon, L. ( 1995). Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. In B. Blumenthal, J. Gornostaev, & C. Unger (Eds.), Human-computer interaction (pp. 189-201). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
37. Kessler, G. ( 2009). Student-initiated attention to form in autonomous wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 79-95.
38. Khatib, M., & Bijani, H. ( 2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of various types of error feedback on students' L2 writing quality. Iranian EFI Journal, 8, 102-116.
39. Komura, K. ( 1999). Student response to error correction in ESL classrooms (Unpublished master's thesis). California State University, Sacramento.
40. Kuutti, K. ( 1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Lalande, J. F. ( 1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.
42. Lantolf, J. P. ( 2006). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 67-109.
43. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. ( 2007). Sociocultural theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 201-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Lavolette, E., Polio, C., & Kahng, J. ( 2015). The accuracy of computer-assisted feedback and students' responses to it. Language Learning & Technology, 19, 50-68. Retrieved June 15, 2015, from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2015/lavolettepoliokahng.pdf
45. Lee, L. ( 2007). Fostering second language oral communication through constructivist interaction in desktop videoconferencing. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 635-649.
46. Leki, I. ( 1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218.
47. Manchón, R. M. (Ed.). ( 2011). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Morris, F. ( 2005). Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer-mediated L2 class. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 29-45. Retrieved July 1, 2015, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num1/morris/default.html
49. Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. ( 2000). A Vygotskyian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34-51.
50. Oladejo, J. A. ( 1993). Error correction in ESL: Learners' preferences. TESL Canada Journal, 10, 71-89.
51. Oskoz, A. ( 2009). Learners' feedback in online chats: What does it reveal about students learning? CALICO Journal, 27, 48-68.
52. Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. ( 2014). Promoting foreign language collaborative writing through the use of Web 2.0 tools. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology and tasks: Exploring technology-mediated TBLT (pp. 115-147). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
53. Radecki, P., & Swales, J. ( 1988). ESL student reaction to written comment on their work. System, 16, 355-365.
54. Rennie, C. E. ( 2000). Student preferences regarding grammar instruction and feedback in university-level ESL courses (Unpublished master's thesis). California State University, Sacramento.
55. Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I., ( 1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-93.
56. Saito, H. ( 1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11, 46-70.
57. Sauro, S. ( 2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 96-120.
58. Semke, H. ( 1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195-202.
59. Sheen, Y. ( 2010). The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 169-179.
60. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. ( 2010). Learners' processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303-334.
61. Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y.-P. ( 2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292-305.
62. Tuzi, F. ( 2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21, 217-235.
63. Vinagre, M., & Lera, M. ( 2008). The role of error correction in online exchanges. In F. Zhang & B. Barber (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer-enhanced language acquisition and learning (pp. 326-341). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
64. Vinagre, M., & Muñoz, B. ( 2011). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and language accuracy in telecollaborative exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 15, 72-103.
65. Vygotsky, L. ( 1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Ware, P. D., & O'Dowd, R. ( 2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 43-63.
67. Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. ( 2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200.
68. Zhang, S. ( 1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209-222.