Learners’ feedback in online chats: What does it reveal about students’ learning?

CALICO Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 48-68

  Osko, Ana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85045167053     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11139/cj.27.1.48-68     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Review, 78, 465-483.
2. Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314-342.
3. Antón, M., DiCamilla, F., & Lantolf, J. (2003). Sociocultural theory and the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. In B. Lafford & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Spanish second language acquisition. State of the science (pp. 262-284). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
4. Beauvois, M. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 177-190.
5. Beauvois, M. (1997). High-tech, high-touch: From discussion to composition in the net-worked classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10, 57-69.
6. Beauvois, M. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 198-217.
7. Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html
8. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygostky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygostky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
10. Cononelos, T., & Oliva, M. (1993). Using computer networks to enhance foreign language culture education. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 525-534.
11. Darhower, M. (2002). Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19, 249-277. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
12. DiCamilla, F., & Antón, M. (1997). Repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners: A Vygotskian perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609-633.
13. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding on second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Westport, CT: Ablex.
14. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language class-room. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 27-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in non-native speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19, 279-294. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
16. Fidalgo-Eick, M. (2001). Synchornous on-line negotiation of meaning by intermediate learners of Span-ish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
17. Frawley, W. (1997). Vygotsky and cognitive science: Language and the unification of the social and com-putational mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-30.
19. Kelm, O. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A prelimi-nary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-445.
20. Kelm, O. (1996). The application of computer networks in foreign language education: Focusing on principles of second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 19-28). Manoa, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
21. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
22. Kinginger, C. (2002). Defining the zone of proximal development in US foreign language education. Applied Linguistics, 23, 240-261.
23. Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ linguistic awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 73-93.
24. Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourseSystem, 30, 275-288.
25. Lee, L. (2006). A study of native and non-native speakers’ feedback and responses in Spanish-American networked collaborative interaction. In J. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercul-tural foreign language education. (pp. 147-176). Boston: Thomson Heinle.
26. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
27. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
28. Mackey, A., Oliver, R,. & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66.
29. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Morris, F. (2005). Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer mediated L2 class. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 29-45. Retrieved August 25, 2007, from http://llt.msu. edu/vol9num1/morris/default.html
31. Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34-51.
32. Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 51-78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.
34. Oscoz, A. (2003). Jigsaw and free discussion in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
35. Palincsar, A. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh—A response to C. Addisons Stone’s “The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities.” Journal of Learning Dis-abilities, 31, 370-373.
36. Pellettieri, J. (1999). Why-talk? Investigating the role of task-based interaction through synchronous network-based communication among classroom learners of Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dis-sertation, University of California, Davis.
37. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Sanders, R. (2006). A comparison of chat room productivity: In-class versus out-of-class. CALICO Jour-nal, 24, 59-76. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
39. Smith, B. (2001). Taking students to task: Task-based computer-mediated communication and negotiated interaction in the ESL classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
40. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.
41. Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feedback via instant messenger learning activities in NS-NNS dyads. CALICO Journal, 22, 467-496. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5
42. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.
43. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating infer-ences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18, 275-302.
45. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
46. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-37.
47. Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141-159. Retrieved April 25, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/tudini
48. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
49. Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Werstch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 143-184). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
50. Vygostky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
51. Wells, G. (1998). Using L1 to master L2: A response to Antón and DiCamilla’s “Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom.” The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 343-353.
52. Wertsch, J., & Stone, C. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygostky’s account of the genesis of higher mental education. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vy-gotskyian perspectives (pp. 162-179). New York: Cambridge University Press.