Introduction: The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 169-179

  Sheen, Younghee ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957242003     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263109990489     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
2. Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12, 183-210.
3. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
4. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research Journal, 12, 409-431.
5. Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners errors. Language Learning, 27, 29-46.
6. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 97-113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368. (Pubitemid 43615577)
9. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.
10. Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-10.
11. Ferris, D. R. (2004). The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we and where do we go from here? Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.
12. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 82, 299-307.
13. Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 40-53.
14. Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
15. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 51-70.
16. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 1-19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
18. Lalande, J. (1982). Reducing composition error: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.
19. Leki, I. (2000). Writing, literacy, and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 20, 99-115.
20. Li, S. (2009, March). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, 2009, Denver, CO.
21. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: Benjamin.
22. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
24. Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59, 453-498.
25. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269-300. (Pubitemid 43615575)
26. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
27. Mackey, A. (2007). The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2006). Pushing the methodological boundaries in interaction research: An introduction to the special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 169-178.
29. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Polio, C. (2001). Research methodology in second language writing research: The case of text-based studies. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 91-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Polio, C., Fleck, N., & Leder, N. (1998). "If only I had more time": ESL learners changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 43-68. (Pubitemid 128413697)
32. Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFLwriting quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-93.
33. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
34. Schmidt, R. (1995). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
35. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Segalowitz, N., & Lightbown, P. (1999). Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 43-63.
37. Sheen, Y. (2007 a). The effect of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301-322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Sheen, Y. (2007 b). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
39. Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835-874.
40. Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37, 353-371.
41. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 91-103). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
42. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369. (Pubitemid 126118425)
44. Truscott, J. (1999). The case for "the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes": A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111-122.
45. Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337-343. (Pubitemid 40004199)
46. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255-272.
47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol.1. Thinking and speaking. New York: Plenum Press.