A single three-dimensional chromatin compartment in amphioxus indicates a stepwise evolution of vertebrate Hox bimodal regulation

Nature Genetics

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 336-341

  Acemel, Rafael D ^a   Tena, Juan J ^a   Irastorza Azcarate, Ibai ^a   Marlétaz, Ferdinand ^b   Gómez Marín, Carlos ^a   De La Calle Mustienes, Elisa ^a   Bertrand, Stéphanie ^c   Diaz, Sergio G ^a   Aldea, Daniel ^c   Aury, Jean Marc ^d   Mangenot, Sophie ^d   Holland, Peter W H ^b   Devos, Damien P ^a   Maeso, Ignacio ^a   Escrivá, Hector ^c   Gómez Skarmeta, José Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d DIF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOX PROTEIN; CHROMATIN; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; HOXA PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BRANCHIOSTOMA; CELL INTERACTION; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EVOLUTION; GENE CLUSTER; HOX GENE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VERTEBRATE; ANIMAL; BIOSYNTHESIS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LIMB; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MORPHOGENESIS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CHROMATIN; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; EXTREMITIES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; LANCELETS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 84959369417     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3497     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Lonfat N., & Duboule D. Structure, function and evolution of topologically associating domains (TADs) at HOX loci. FEBS Lett. 589, 2869-2876 (2015
2. Andrey G., et al. A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 340, 1234167 (2013
3. De Laat W., & Duboule D. Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes. Nature 502, 499-506 (2013
4. Gómez-Díaz E., & Corces V.G. Architectural proteins: regulators of 3D genome organization in cell fate. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 703-711 (2014
5. Ciabrelli F., & Cavalli G. Chromatin-driven behavior of topologically associating domains. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 608-625 (2015
6. Mallo M., & Alonso C.R. The regulation of Hox gene expression during animal development. Development 140, 3951-3963 (2013
7. Montavon T., et al. A regulatory archipelago controls Hox genes transcription in digits. Cell 147, 1132-1145 (2011
8. Woltering J.M., Noordermeer D., Leleu M., & Duboule D. Conservation and divergence of regulatory strategies at Hox loci and the origin of tetrapod digits. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001773 (2014
9. Berlivet S., et al. Clustering of tissue-specific sub-TADs accompanies the regulation of HoxA genes in developing limbs. PLoS Genet. 9, e1004018 (2013
10. Lonfat N., Montavon T., Darbellay F., Gitto S., & Duboule D. Convergent evolution of complex regulatory landscapes and pleiotropy at Hox loci. Science 346, 1004-1006 (2014
11. Dehal P., & Boore J.L. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 3, e314 (2005
12. Lehoczky J.A., Williams M.E., & Innis J.W. Conserved expression domains for genes upstream and within the HoxA and HoxD clusters suggests a long-range enhancer existed before cluster duplication. Evol. Dev. 6, 423-430 (2004
13. Maeso I., et al. An ancient genomic regulatory block conserved across bilaterians and its dismantling in tetrapods by retrogene replacement. Genome Res. 22, 642-655 (2012
14. Paps J., Holland P.W., & Shimeld S.M. A genome-wide view of transcription factor gene diversity in chordate evolution: less gene loss in amphioxus?. Brief. Funct. Genomics 11, 177-186 (2012
15. Bertrand S., & Escriva H. Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: amphioxus. Development 138, 4819-4830 (2011
16. Holland L.Z., & Onai T. Early development of cephalochordates (amphioxus). Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 1, 167-183 (2012
17. Noordermeer D., et al. Temporal dynamics and developmental memory of 3D chromatin architecture at Hox gene loci. eLife 3, e02557 (2014
18. Noordermeer D., et al. The dynamic architecture of Hox gene clusters. Science 334, 222-225 (2011
19. Pascual-Anaya J., et al. Broken colinearity of the amphioxus Hox cluster. Evodevo 3, 28 (2012
20. Dixon J.R., et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 2012
21. Ghavi-Helm Y., et al. Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature 512, 96-100 (2014
22. Gonzalez F., Duboule D., & Spitz F. Transgenic analysis of Hoxd gene regulation during digit development. Dev. Biol. 306, 847-859 (2007
23. Gehrke A.R., et al. Deep conservation of wrist and digit enhancers in fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 803-808 (2015
24. Buenrostro J.D., Giresi P.G., Zaba L.C., Chang H.Y., & Greenleaf W.J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213-1218 (2013
25. Ferrier D.E., Minguillón C., Cebrián C., & Garcia-Fernàndez J. Amphioxus Evx genes: implications for the evolution of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary and the chordate tailbud. Dev. Biol. 237, 270-281 (2001
26. Liu Y., Schröder J., & Schmidt B. Musket: a multistage k-mer spectrum-based error corrector for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 29, 308-315 (2013
27. Magoč, T., & Salzberg S.L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957-2963 (2011
28. Luo R., et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read De novo assembler. Gigascience 1, 18 (2012
29. Huang S., et al. HaploMerger: reconstructing allelic relationships for polymorphic diploid genome assemblies. Genome Res. 22, 1581-1588 (2012
30. Haas B.J., et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 9, R7 (2008
31. Stanke M., et al. Augustus: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435-W439 (2006
32. Parra G., Bradnam K., & Korf I. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23, 1061-1067 (2007
33. Slater G.S., & Birney E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics 6, 31 (2005
34. Baughman K.W., et al. Genomic organization of Hox and ParaHox clusters in the echinoderm, Acanthaster planci. Genesis 52, 952-958 (2014
35. Frazer K.A., Pachter L., Poliakov A., Rubin E.M., & Dubchak I. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W273-W279 (2004
36. Fuentes M., et al. Insights into spawning behavior and development of the European amphioxus (Branchiostoma lanceolatum). J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 308, 484-493 (2007
37. Fuentes M., et al. Preliminary observations on the spawning conditions of the European amphioxus (Branchiostoma lanceolatum) in captivity. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 302, 384-391 (2004
38. Somorjai I., Bertrand S., Camasses A., Haguenauer A., & Escriva H. Evidence for stasis and not genetic piracy in developmental expression patterns of Branchiostoma lanceolatum and Branchiostoma floridae, two amphioxus species that have evolved independently over the course of 200 Myr. Dev. Genes Evol. 218, 703-713 (2008
39. Dekker J., Rippe K., Dekker M., & Kleckner N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306-1311 (2002
40. Hagège H., et al. Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3C-qPCR). Nat. Protoc. 2, 1722-1733 (2007
41. Splinter E., De Wit E., van De Werken H.J., Klous P., & De Laat W. Determining long-range chromatin interactions for selected genomic sites using 4C-seq technology: from fixation to computation. Methods 58, 221-230 (2012
42. Rozen S., & Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol. Biol. 132, 365-386 (2000
43. Smemo S., et al. Obesity-associated variants within FTO form long-range functional connections with IRX3. Nature 507, 371-375 (2014
44. Baù D., et al. The three-dimensional folding of the α-globin gene domain reveals formation of chromatin globules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 107-114 (2011
45. Russel D., et al. Putting the pieces together: integrative modeling platform software for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001244 (2012
46. Saeed A.I., et al. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques 34, 374-378 (2003
47. Lupiáñez D.G., et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012-1025 (2015
48. van Weerd J.H., et al. A large permissive regulatory domain exclusively controls Tbx3 expression in the cardiac conduction system. Circ. Res. 115, 432-441 (2014
49. Vietri Rudan M., et al. Comparative Hi-C reveals that CTCF underlies evolution of chromosomal domain architecture. Cell Rep. 10, 1297-1309 (2015
50. Hou C., Li L., Qin Z.S., & Corces V.G. Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Mol. Cell 48, 471-484 (2012
51. Zhang Y., et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148, 908-921 (2012
52. Bessa J., et al. Zebrafish enhancer detection (ZED) vector: a new tool to facilitate transgenesis and the functional analysis of cis-regulatory regions in zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 238, 2409-2417 (2009
53. Kawakami K. Transgenesis and gene trap methods in zebrafish by using the Tol2 transposable element. Methods Cell Biol. 77, 201-222 (2004