Susceptibility mapping of shallow landslides using kernel-based Gaussian process, support vector machines and logistic regression

Journal of African Earth Sciences

Volumn 118, Issue , 2016, Pages 53-64

  Colkesen, Ismail ^a   Sahin, Emrehan Kutlug ^a   Kavzoglu, Taskin ^a  

^a GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Gaussian process; Kernel learning; Landslide; Logistic regression; Support vector machine; Susceptibility mapping

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; GAUSSIAN METHOD; GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; LANDSLIDE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

TRABZON [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84959319429     PISSN: 1464343X     EISSN: 18791956     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.02.019     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ahmed B. Landslide susceptibility mapping using multi-criteria evaluation techniques in Chittagong Metropolitan Area, Bangladesh. Landslides 2014, 10.1007/s10346-014-0521-x.
2. Akgun A., Dag S., Bulut F. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ. Geol. 2008, 54:1127-1143.
3. Akgun A., Sezer E.A., Nefeslioglu H.A., Gokceoglu C., Pradhan B. An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm. Comput. Geosci. UK 2012, 38:23-34.
4. Akgun A., Turk N. Landslide susceptibility mapping for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) and its vicinity by multicriteria decision analysis. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 61:595-611.
5. Aleotti P., Chowdhury R. Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. B Eng. Geol. Environ. 1999, 58:21-44.
6. Althuwaynee O.F., Pradhan B., Park H.J., Lee J.H. A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena 2014, 114:21-36.
7. Atkinson P.M., Massari R. Generalised linear modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central Apennines, Italy. Comput. Geosci. 1998, 24:373-385.
8. Ayalew L., Yamagishi H. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 2005, 65:15-31.
9. Ayalew L., Yamagishi H., Ugawa N. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 2004, 1:73-81.
10. Bazi Y., Alajlan N., Melgani F., AlHichri H., Yager R.R. Robust estimation of water chlorophyll concentrations with gaussian process regression and IOWA aggregation operators. IEEE J-Stars 2014, 7:3019-3028.
11. Boser B.E., Guyon I.M., Vapnik V. A training algorithm for optimum margin classifiers. In Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory 1992, ACM, Pittsburgh.
12. Brabb E.E. Innovative approaches to landslide hazard mapping. Proceedings of the IV International Symposium of Landslides 1984, Canadian Geotechnical Society, Canada: Toronto.
13. Brenning A. Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat. Hazard Earth Sys 2005, 5:853-862.
14. Bui D.T., Lofman O., Revhaug I., Dick O. Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression. Nat. Hazards 2011, 59:1413-1444.
15. Bui D.T., Pradhan B., Lofman O., Revhaug I. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and naive Bayes models. Math. Probl. Eng. 2012, 2012:1-26.
16. Catani F., Lagomarsino D., Segoni S., Tofani V. Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues. Nat. Hazard Earth Sys 2013, 13:2815-2831.
17. Cherkassky V., Ma Y.Q. Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression. Neural Netw. 2004, 17:113-126.
18. Cherkassky V., Mulier F. Learning from Data: Concepts, Theory, and Methods 2007, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. second ed.
19. Christiani N., Shave-Taylor J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods 2000, Cambridge University Press, UK.
20. Chung C.J.F., Fabbri A.G. Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat. Hazards 2003, 30:451-472.
21. Congalton R.G., Green K. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practice 2008, CRC Press, Boca Raton. second ed.
22. Dai F.C., Lee C.F. Landslide characteristics and, slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 2002, 42:213-228.
23. Dhakal A.S., Amada T., Aniya M. Landslide hazard mapping and its evaluation using GIS: an investigation of sampling schemes for a grid-cell based quantitative method. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S 2000, 66:981-989.
24. Dou J., Chang K.T., Chen S.S., Yunus A.P., Liu J.K., Xia H., Zhu Z.F. Automatic case-based reasoning approach for landslide detection: integration of object-oriented image analysis and a genetic algorithm. Remote Sens-Basel 2015, 7:4318-4342.
25. Dou J., Paudel U., Oguchi T., Uchiyama S., Hayakawa Y.S. Shallow and deep-seated landslide differentiation using support vector machines: a case study of the Chuetsu area, Japan. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 2015, 26:227-239.
26. Dou J., Bui D.T., Yunus A.P., Jia K., Song X., Revhaug I., Xia H., Zhu Z.F. Optimization of causative factors for landslide susceptibility evaluation using remote sensing and GIS data in parts of Niigata, Japan. Plos One 2015, 10.
27. Eker A.M., Dikmen M., Cambazoglu S., Duzgun S.H.B., Akgun H. Evaluation and comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methods, a case study for the Ulus district, Bartin, northern Turkey. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2015, 29:132-158.
28. Fressard M., Thiery Y., Maquaire O. Which data for quantitative landslide susceptibility mapping at operational scale? Case study of the Pays d'Auge plateau hillslopes (Normandy, France). Nat. Hazard Earth Sys 2014, 14:569-588.
29. Garcia-Rodriguez M.J., Malpica J.A., Benito B., Diaz M. Susceptibility assessment of earthquake-triggered landslides in El Salvador using logistic regression. Geomorphology 2008, 95:172-191.
30. Gleason C.J., Im J. Forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR data using machine learning approaches. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 125:80-91.
31. Goetz J.N., Brenning A., Petschko H., Leopold P. Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput. Geosci. 2015, 81:1-11.
32. Gómez H., Kavzoglu T. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng. Geol. 2005, 78:11-27.
33. Guzzetti F. Landslide Hazard and Risk Assessment 2006, PhD Thesis, University of Bonn.
34. Guzzetti F., Mondini A.C., Cardinali M., Fiorucci F., Santangelo M., Chang K.T. Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem. Earth-Sci Rev. 2012, 112:42-66.
35. Holec J., Bednarik M., Sabo M., Minar J., Yilmaz I., Marschalko M. A small-scale landslide susceptibility assessment for the territory of Western Carpathians. Nat. Hazards 2013, 69:1081-1107.
36. Hultquist C., Chen G., Zhao K.G. A comparison of Gaussian process regression, random forests and support vector regression for burn severity assessment in diseased forests. Remote Sens. Lett. 2014, 5:723-732.
37. Hutchinson J.N. General report: morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology. Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Landslides 1988, 3-35. Balkema, Rotterdam. C. Bonnard (Ed.).
38. Jaafari A., Najafi A., Pourghasemi H.R., Rezaeian J., Sattarian A. GIS-based frequency ratio and index of entropy models for landslide susceptibility assessment in the Caspian forest, northern Iran. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 11:909-926.
39. Jebur M.N., Pradhan B., Tehrany M.S. Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 152:150-165.
40. Kavzoglu T., Colkesen I. A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. 2009, 11:352-359.
41. Kavzoglu T., Colkesen I. Investigation of the effects of kernel functions in satellite image classification using support vector machines. Harita Derg. 2010, 144:73-82. (in Turkish).
42. Kavzoglu T., Sahin E.K., Colkesen I. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides 2014, 11:425-439.
43. Kavzoglu T., Sahin E.K., Colkesen I. An assessment of multivariate and bivariate approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Duzkoy district. Nat. Hazards 2015, 76:471-496.
44. Kavzoglu T., Sahin E.K., Colkesen I. Selecting optimal conditioning factors in shallow translational landslide susceptibility mapping using genetic algorithm. Eng. Geol. 2015, 192:101-112.
45. Kleinbaum D.G. Logistic Regression: a Self-learning Text 1994, 282. Springer, New York.
46. Lee M.J., Choi J.W., Oh H.J., Won J.S., Park I., Lee S. Ensemble-based landslide susceptibility maps in Jinbu area, Korea. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 67:23-37.
47. Lee S. Landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network in the Gangneung area, Korea. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2007, 28:4763-4783.
48. Menard S. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis 2001, Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. second ed.
49. Meten M., PrakashBhandary N., Yatabe R. Effect of landslide factor combinations on the prediction accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps in the Blue Nile Gorge of Central Ethiopia. Geoenviron. Disasters 2015, 2:1-17.
50. Mountrakis G., Im J., Ogole C. Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. 2011, 66:247-259.
51. Neaupane K.M., Piantanakulchai M. Analytic network process model for landslide hazard zonation. Eng. Geol. 2006, 85:281-294.
52. Nefeslioglu H.A., Duman T.Y., Durmaz S. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey). Geomorphology 2008, 94:401-418.
53. Nefeslioglu H.A., Gokceoglu C., Sonmez H. An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Eng. Geol. 2008, 97:171-191.
54. Nefeslioglu H.A., Gokceoglu C., Sonmez H., Gorum T. Medium-scale hazard mapping for shallow landslide initiation: the Buyukkoy catchment area (Cayeli, Rize, Turkey). Landslides 2011, 8:459-483.
55. Nemčok A., Pašek J., Rybář J. Classification of landslides and other mass movements. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. 1972, 4:71-78.
56. Neuhäuser B., Damm B., Terhorst B. GIS-based assessment of landslide susceptibility on the base of the Weights-of-Evidence model. Landslides 2012, 9:511-528.
57. Pardeshi S.D., Autade S.E., Pardeshi S.S. Landslide hazard assessment: recent trends and techniques. Springerplus 2013, 2:523.
58. Pasolli L., Melgani F., Blanzieri E. Gaussian process regression for estimating chlorophyll concentration in subsurface waters from remote sensing data. IEEE Geosci. Remote S 2010, 7:464-468.
59. Pourghasemi H.R., Pradhan B., Gokceoglu C., Deylami Moezzi K. Landslide susceptibility mapping using a spatial multi criteria evaluation model at Haraz watershed, Iran. Terrigenous Mass Movements 2012, 23-49. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. B. Pradhan, M. Buchroithner (Eds.).
60. Rasmussen C., Williams C.K.I. Gaussian Process for Machine Learning 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
61. Remondo J., Gonzalez-Diez A., De Teran J.R.D., Cendrero A. Landslide susceptibility models utilising spatial data analysis techniques. A case study from the lower Deba Valley, Guipuzcoa (Spain). Nat. Hazards 2003, 30:267-279.
62. Santacana N., Baeza B., Corominas J., De Paz A., Marturia J. A GIS-based multivariate statistical analysis for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping in La Pobla de Lillet area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Nat. Hazards 2003, 30:281-295.
63. Sivakumar M.V.K. Impacts of Natural Disasters in Agriculture, Rangeland and Forestry, an Overview. Natural Disasters and Extreme Events in Agriculture: Impacts and Mitigation 2005, 1-22.
64. Smola A.J., Scholkopf B. A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput. 2004, 14:199-222.
65. Stulp F., Sigaud O. Many regression algorithms, one unified model: a review. Neural Netw. 2015, 69:60-79.
66. Suzen M.L., Doyuran V. Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment. Turk. Eng. Geol. 2004, 71:303-321.
67. Trigila A., Iadanza C., Esposito C., Scarascia-Mugnozza G. Comparison of logistic regression and random forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology 2015, 249:119-136.
68. Van Westen C.J., Rengers N., Soeters R. Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat. Hazards 2003, 30:399-419.
69. Vapnik V.N. Statistical Learning Theory 1998, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
70. Vapnik V.N. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory 1999, Springer, New York. second ed.
71. Varnes D.J. Slope movements: types and processes. Landslide Analysis and Control 1978, Transportation Research Board Special Report 176, National Academy of Sciences, USA, Washington. R.L. Schuster, R.J. Krizek (Eds.).
72. Were K., Bui D.T., Dick O.B., Singh B.R. A comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane landscape. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 52:394-403.
73. Witten I.H., Frank E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques 2005, Elsevier, San Francisco. second ed.
74. Xie X.S., Liu W.T., Tang B.Y. Spacebased estimation of moisture transport in marine atmosphere using support vector regression. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112:1846-1855.
75. Xu C. Earthquake-triggered Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the 2010 Yushu, China Earthquake Struck Area Using Artificial Neural Network Model, Global View of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2013, 217-223. Taylor & Francis, London. F. Wu, S. Qi (Eds.).
76. Yalcin A. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 2008, 72:1-12.
77. Yalcin A., Reis S., Aydinoglu A.C., Yomralioglu T. A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 2011, 85:274-287.
78. Yilmaz I. Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 61:821-836.
79. Zhao K.G., Popescu S., Meng X.L., Pang Y., Agca M. Characterizing forest canopy structure with lidar composite metrics and machine learning. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115:1978-1996.