Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression

Landslides

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 425-439

  Kavzoglu, Taskin ^a   Sahin, Emrehan Kutlug ^a   Colkesen, Ismail ^a  

^a GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Landslide; Logistic regression; Multi criteria decision analysis; Support vector machine; Susceptibility mapping

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; DISASTER PREVENTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LITHOLOGY; MAPPING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; LOGISTIC REGRESSION METHOD; LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELING; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION METHODS; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION (SVR); SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING;

LANDSLIDES;

DECISION ANALYSIS; GIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LANDSLIDE; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

TRABZON [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84902014292     PISSN: 1612510X     EISSN: 16125118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Akgun A (2012) A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at Izmir, Turkey. Landslides 9(1): 93-106.
2. Armas I (2011) An analytic multicriteria hierarchical approach to assess landslide vulnerability. Case study: Cornu village, Subcarpathian Prahova Valley/Romania. Z Geomorphol 55(2): 209-229.
3. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65(1-2): 15-31.
4. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1(1): 73-81.
5. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Marui H, Kanno T (2005) Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications. Eng Geol 81(4): 432-445.
6. Bai SB, Lu GN, Wang JA, Zhou PG, Ding LA (2011) GIS-based rare events logistic regression for landslide-susceptibility mapping of Lianyungang, China. Environ Earth Sci 62(1): 139-149.
7. Ballabio C, Sterlacchini S (2012) Support Vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: the Staffora River Basin Case Study, Italy. Math Geosci 44(1): 47-70.
8. Bayrak T, Ulukavak M (2009) Trabzon heyelanlari{dotless}. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi 1(2): 20-30 (in Turkish).
9. Begueria S (2006) Changes in land cover and shallow landslide activity: a case study in the Spanish Pyrenees. Geomorphology 74(1-4): 196-206.
10. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24(1): 43-69.
11. Boroushaki S, Malczewski J (2008) Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS. Comput Geosci 34(4): 399-410.
12. Brenning A (2005) Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat Hazard Earth Sys 5(6): 853-862.
13. Castellanos Abella EA, van Westen CJ (2007) Generation of a landslide risk index map for Cuba using spatial multi-criteria evaluation. Landslides 4(4): 311-325.
14. Chaplot V, Le Bissonnais Y (2000) Field measurements of interrill erosion under different slopes and plot sizes. Earth Surf Proc Land 25(2): 145-153.
15. Cherkassky V, Ma YQ (2004) Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression. Neural Netw 17(1): 113-126.
16. Cherkassky V, Mulier F (2007) Learning from data: concepts, theory and methods, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
17. Collins TK (2008) Debris flows caused by failure of fill slopes: early detection, warning, and loss prevention. Landslides 5(1): 107-120.
18. Conforti M, Aucelli PPC, Robustelli G, Scarciglia F (2011) Geomorphology and GIS analysis for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in the Turbolo stream catchment (Northern Calabria, Italy). Nat Hazards 56(3): 881-898.
19. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3): 273-297.
20. Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and, slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42(3-4): 213-228.
21. Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40(3): 381-391.
22. De Leeuw J, Jia H, Yang L, Liu X, Schmidt K, Skidmore AK (2006) Comparing accuracy assessments to infer superiority of image classification methods. Int J Remote Sens 27(1): 223-232.
23. Devkota KC, Regmi AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Dhital MR, Althuwaynee OF (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards 65(1): 135-165.
24. Eastman R (2003) Idrisi Kilimanjaro Manual and Tutorial. Clark Labs, Clark University, Worchester.
25. Ergünay O (2007) Türkiye'nin afet profili. TMMOB Afet Sempozyumu, Ankara, pp 42-45 (in Turkish).
26. Ferri C, Hernandez-Orallo J, Modroiu R (2009) An experimental comparison of performance measures for classification. Pattern Recogn Lett 30(1): 27-38.
27. Foody GM (2004) Thematic map comparison: evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Rem S 70(5): 627-633.
28. Fu WJ, He YR (2010) Landslide susceptibility evaluation based on fuzzy support vector machine. Sixth Int Symp Digit Earth Data Process Appl 7841. doi: 10. 1117/12. 873267.
29. Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Can T (2005) The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide-susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Eng Geol 81(1): 65-83.
30. Gómez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol 78(1-2): 11-27.
31. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31(1-4): 181-216.
32. Hickey R (2000) Slope angle and slope length solutions for GIS. Cartography 29(1): 1-8.
33. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied regression analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
34. Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I (2009) A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Appl Earth Obs 11(5): 352-359.
35. Liu BY, Nearing MA, Shi PJ, Jia ZW (2000) Slope length effects on soil loss for steep slopes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(5): 1759-1763.
36. Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto.
37. Melo ALO, Calijuri ML, Duarte ICD, Azevedo RF, Lorentz JF (2006) Strategic decision analysis for selection of landfill sites. J Surv Eng-Asce 132(2): 83-92.
38. Menard S (2001) Applied logistic regression analysis, 2nd edn. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, California.
39. Nandi A, Shakoor A (2010) A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Eng Geol 110(1-2): 11-20.
40. Neuhauser B, Damm B, Terhorst B (2012) GIS-based assessment of landslide susceptibility on the base of the weights-of-evidence model. Landslides 9(4): 511-528.
41. Pradhan B (2013) A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci 51(0): 350-365.
42. Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Modell Softw 25(6): 747-759.
43. Restrepo C, Vitousek P, Neville P (2003) Landslides significantly alter land cover and the distribution of biomass: an example from the Ninole ridges of Hawai'i. Plant Ecol 166(1): 131-143.
44. Roy B (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
45. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting. Resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
46. Santacana N, Baeza B, Corominas J, De Paz A, Marturia J (2003) A GIS-based multivariate statistical analysis for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping in La Pobla de Lillet area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Nat Hazards 30(3): 281-295.
47. Sarkar S, Kanungo DP (2004) An integrated approach for landslide susceptibility mapping using remote sensing and GIS. Photogramm Eng Rem S 70(5): 617-625.
48. Segoni S, Rossi G, Catani F (2012) Improving basin-scale shallow landslides modelling using reliable soil thickness maps. Nat Hazards 61: 85-101.
49. Smola AJ, Scholkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14(3): 199-222.
50. Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71(3-4): 303-321.
51. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240(4857): 1285-1293.
52. Vapnik VN (1999) The nature of statistical learning yheory, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.
53. Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslides analysis and control. National Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 12-33.
54. Vivas L (1992) Los Andes Venezolanos. Academia Nacional de la Historia, Caracas.
55. Wang WD, Xie CM, Du XG (2009) Landslides susceptibility mapping based on geographical information system, GuiZhou, south-west China. Environ Geol 58(1): 33-43.
56. Yalcin A (2011) A geotechnical study on the landslides in the Trabzon Province, NE, Turkey. Appl Clay Sci 52(1-2): 11-19.
57. Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85(3): 274-287.
58. Yao X, Tham LG, Dai FC (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology 101(4): 572-582.
59. Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79(3-4): 251-266.
60. Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Comput Geosci 35(6): 1125-1138.
61. Yilmaz I (2010) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci 61(4): 821-836.
62. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8(3): 338-353.