An assessment of multivariate and bivariate approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Duzkoy district

Natural Hazards

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 471-496

  Kavzoglu, Taskin ^a   Kutlug Sahin, Emrehan ^a   Colkesen, Ismail ^a  

^a GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Decision tree; Frequency ratio; Landslide Susceptibility mapping; Logistic regression; Support vector machine; Weight of evidence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925507482     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: 15730840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1506-8     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Abdallah C (2010) Spatial distribution of block falls using volumetric GIS-decision-tree models. Int J Appl Earth Obs 12:393–403
2. Akgun A (2012) A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at Izmir. Turkey. Landslides 9(1):93–106
3. Akgun A, Dag S, Bulut F (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ Geol 54:1127–1143
4. Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Env 58:21–44
5. Alparslan E (2011) Landslide susceptibility mapping in Yalova, Turkey, by remote sensing and GIS. Environ Eng Geosci 17:255–265
6. Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Park HJ, Lee JH (2014) A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena 114:21–36
7. Armas I (2012) Weights of evidence method for landslide susceptibility mapping. Prahova Subcarpathians. Romania. Nat Hazards 60:937–950
8. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31
9. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1:73–81
10. Ballabio C, Sterlacchini S (2012) Support vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: the Staffora River Basin case study, Italy. Math Geosci 44:47–70
11. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24:43–69
12. Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modelling with GIS. Pergamon, Oxford
13. Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140
14. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Belmont
15. Bui DT, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick O (2011) Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression. Nat Hazards 59:1413–1444
16. Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I (2012) Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and naive Bayes models. Math Probl Eng. vol. 2012, Article ID 974638, doi:10.1155/2012/974638
17. Burges CJC, Schölkopf B (1997) Improving the accuracy and speed of support vector learning machine. In: Mozer MC, Jordan MI, Petsche T (ed) Advances in neural information processing systems 9. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp 375–381
18. Cevik E, Topal T (2003) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey). Environ Geol 44:949–962
19. Chang YL, Liang LS, Han CC, Fang JP, Liang WY, Chen KS (2007) Multisource data fusion for landslide classification using generalized positive Boolean functions. IEEE T Geosci Remote 45(6):1697–1708
20. Costanzo D, Rotigliano E, Irigaray C, Jimenez-Peralvarez JD, Chacon J (2012) Factors selection in landslide susceptibility modelling on large scale following the GIS matrix method: application to the river Beiro basin (Spain). Nat Hazard Earth Sys 12:327–340
21. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
22. Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Nonomura A, Yamanaka M, Masuda T, Nishino K (2008) GIS-based weights-of-evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 54:311–324
23. Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40:381–391
24. Demir G, Aytekin M, Akgun A, Ikizler SB, Tatar O (2013) A comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping of the eastern part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and analytic hierarchy process methods. Nat Hazards 65:1481–1506
25. Devkota KC, Regmi AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Dhital MR, Althuwaynee OF (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards 65(1):135–165
26. Durbha SS, King RL, Younan NH (2007) Support vector machines regression for retrieval of leaf area index from multiangle imaging spectroradiometer. Remote Sens Environ 107:348–361
27. Ercanoglu M (2005) Landslide susceptibility assessment of SE Bartin (West Black Sea region, Turkey) by artificial neural networks. Nat Hazard Earth Sys 5(6):979–992
28. Fall M, Azzam R, Noubactep C (2006) A multi-method approach to study the stability of natural slopes and landslide susceptibility mapping. Eng Geol 82:241–263
29. Gomez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol 78:11–27
30. Gray DH, Leiser AT (1982) Biotechnical slope protection and erosion control. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York
31. Grozavu A, Pleşcan S, Patriche CV, Mărgărint MC, Roşca B (2013) Landslide susceptibility assessment: GIS application to a complex mountainous environment. In: Kozak J et al (eds) The carpathians: integrating nature and society towards sustainability, environmental science and engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–44
32. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216
33. Ho JY, Lee KT, Chang TC, Wang ZY, Liao YH (2012) Influences of spatial distribution of soil thickness on shallow landslide prediction. Eng Geol 124:38–46
34. Hwang S, Guevarra IF, Yu B (2009) Slope failure prediction using a decision tree: a case of engineered slopes in South Korea. Eng Geol 104:126–134
35. Ito K, Nakano R (2003) Optimizing Support Vector regression hyperparameters based on cross-validation. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 1–4:2077–2082
36. Japkowicz N, Shah M (2011) Evaluating learning algorithms: a classification perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York
37. Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2009) Landslide susceptibility zonation (LSZ) mapping: a review. J South Asia Disaster Stud 2:81–105
38. Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides 11:425–439
39. Kouli M, Loupasakis C, Soupios P, Vallianatos F (2010) Landslide hazard zonation in high risk areas of Rethymno Prefecture, Crete Island, Greece. Nat Hazards 52:599–621
40. Menard S (2001) Applied logistic regression analysis, 2nd edn. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks
41. Nandi A, Shakoor A (2009) A GIS based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Eng Geol 110:11–20
42. Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Durmaz S (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey). Geomorphology 94(3–4):401–418
43. Nefeslioglu HA, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Bozkir AS, Duman TY (2010) Assessment of landslide susceptibility by decision trees in the metropolitan area of Istanbul. Math Probl Eng, Turkey
44. Niuniu X, Yuxun L (2010) Review of decision trees. Computer science and information technology (ICCSIT), 2010 3rd IEEE International Conference, pp. 105–109
45. Pal M, Mather PM (2003) An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ 86:554–565
46. Peng L, Niu RQ, Huang B, Wu XL, Zhao YN, Ye RQ (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on rough set theory and support vector machines: a case of the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology 204:287–301
47. Pourghasemi HR, Jirandeh AG, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran. J Earth SystSci 122(2):349–369
48. Pradhan B (2013) A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci 51:350–365
49. Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Modell Softw 25:747–759
50. Pradhan B, Oh HJ, Buchroithner M (2010) Weights-of-evidence model applied to landslide susceptibility mapping in a tropical hilly area. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 3:199–223
51. Quinlan JR (1993) C4.5: programs for machine learning. Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo
52. Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010) Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology 115:172–187
53. Rokach L, Maimon O (2008) Data mining with decision trees: theory and applications. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence
54. Rupke J, Cammeraat E, Seijmonsbergen AC, Vanwesten CJ (1988) Engineering geomorphology of the widentobel catchment, appenzell and sankt-gallen, gallen, Switzerland: a geomorphological inventory system applied to geotechnical appraisal of slope stability. Eng Geol 26:33–68
55. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting. Resource allocation, McGraw-Hill
56. Santacana N, Baeza B, Corominas J, De Paz A, Marturia J (2003) A GIS-based multivariate statistical analysis for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping in La Pobla de Lillet area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Nat Hazards 30:281–295
57. Sarkar S, Kanungo DP (2004) An integrated approach for landslide susceptibility mapping using remote sensing and GIS. Photogramm Eng Rem S 70:617–625
58. Sarkar S, Kanungo DP, Mehrotra GS (1995) Landslide Hazard Zonation: a case Study in Garhwal Himalaya. India, Mountain Research and Development 15:301–309
59. Schicker R, Moon V (2012) Comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping at a regional scale. Geomorphology 161:40–57
60. Schölkopf B, Smola AJ (2002) Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization and beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge
61. Segoni S, Rossi G, Catani F (2012) Improving basin-scale shallow landslides modelling using reliable soil thickness maps. Nat Hazards 61:85–101
62. Singhal PK, Srivastava P (2004) Challenges in sustainable development. Anmol publication, India
63. Smola AJ, Scholkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14(3):199–222
64. Soeters R, Van Westen CJ (1996) Slope instability recognition analysis and zonation. In: Turner KT, Schuster RL, editors. Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board National Research Council, Special Report No 247, Washington, DC, pp. 129–177
65. Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71:303–321
66. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293
67. Thiery Y, Malet JP, Sterlacchini S, Puissant A, Maquaire O (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment by bivariate methods at large scales: application to a complex mountainous environment. Geomorphology 92:38–59
68. Van Westen CJ (1997) Statistical landslide hazard analysis ILWIS 2.1 for windows application guide. ITC Publication, Enschede
69. Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards 30:399–419
70. Vapnik VN (2000) The nature of statistical learning theory, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York
71. Vivas L (1992) Los andes venezolanos. Academia Nacional de la Historia, Caracas
72. Wu KP, Wang SD (2009) Choosing the kernel parameters for support vector machines by the inter-cluster distance in the feature space. Pattern Recogn 42(5):710–717
73. Xu M, Watanachaturaporn P, Varshney PK, Arora MK (2005) Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data. Remote Sens Environ 97:322–336
74. Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72:1–12
75. Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon. NE Turkey. Catena 85(3):274–287
76. Yao X, Tham LG, Dai FC (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology 101:572–582
77. Yeh CY, Huang CW, Lee SJ (2011) A multiple-kernel support vector regression approach for stock market price forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 38:2177–2186
78. Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79:251–266
79. Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Comput Geosci 35:1125–1138
80. Yilmaz I (2010) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci 61:821–836
81. Yilmaz C, Topal T, Suzen ML (2012) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using bivariate statistical analysis in Devrek (Zonguldak-Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 65:2161–2178