Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression

Natural Hazards

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1413-1444

  Bui, Dieu Tien ^a   Lofman, Owe ^a   Revhaug, Inge ^a   Dick, Oystein ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Hoa Binh province; Landslide susceptibility; Logistic regression; Statistical index

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; FIELDWORK; GEOSTATISTICS; LANDSLIDE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPOT; TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING;

HOA BINH; VIET NAM;

EID: 80955178875     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-011-9844-2     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Atkinson PM, Massari R (1998a) Generalised linear modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central Apennines, Italy. Comput Geosci 24(4): 373-385.
2. Atkinson PM, Massari R (1998b) Generallised linear modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central Apennines, Italia. Comput Geosci 24: 373-385.
3. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65(1-2): 15-31. doi: 10. 1016/j. geomorph. 2004. 06. 010.
4. Bai S, Wang J, Lu G, Zhou P, Hou S, Xu S (2010) GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology 115: 23-31.
5. Bednarik M, Magulova B, Matys M, Marschalko M (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment of the Kralovany-Liptovsky Mikulas railway case study. Phys Chem Earth 35(3-5): 162-171. doi: 10. 1016/j. pce. 2009. 12. 002.
6. Brenning A (2005) Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5(6): 853-862.
7. Can T, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Duman TY (2005) Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three subcatchments by logistic regression analyses. Geomorphology 72: 250-271.
8. Cevik E, Topal T (2003) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey). Environ Geol 44(8): 949-962. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-003-0838-6.
9. Chung CJF, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards 30(3): 451-472.
10. Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and, slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42(3-4): 213-228.
11. Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu JW (2001) Assessment of Landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40: 381-391.
12. Donati L, Turrini MC (2002) An objective method to rank, the importance of the factors predisposing to landslides with the GIS methodology: application to an area of the Apennines, (Valnerina; Perugia, Italy). Eng Geol 63(3-4): 277-289.
13. Falaschi F, Giacomelli F, Federici PR, Puccinelli A, Avanzi GD, Pochini A, Ribolini A (2009) Logistic regression versus artificial neural networks: landslide susceptibility evaluation in a sample area of the Serchio River valley, Italy. Nat Hazards 50(3): 551-569. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-009-9356-5.
14. Galang JS (2004) A comparison of GIS approaches instability zonation in the central Blue Ridge mountain of Virginia. Master Thesis, State University, Blacksburg.
15. Gokceoglu C, Aksoy H (1996) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and image processing techniques. Eng Geol 44(1-4): 147-161.
16. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31(1-4): 181-216.
17. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
18. Hue TT, Duong TV, Toan DV, Nghinh LT, Minh VC, Pho NV, Xuan PT, Hoan LT, Huyen NX, Pha PD, Chinh VV, Thom BV (2004) Investigation and assessment of the types of geological hazard in the territory of Vietnam and recommendation of remedial measures. Phase II: a study of the Northern mountainous province. Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Institute of Geological Sciences, Hanoi.
19. Jade S, Sarkar S (1993) Statistical-models for slope instability classification. Eng Geol 36(1-2): 91-98.
20. Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data journals. Int J Remote Sens 26(7): 1477-1491. doi: 10. 1080/01431160412331331012.
21. Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40(9): 1095-1113.
22. Lee S, Ryu JH, Kim IS (2007) Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models: case study of Youngin, Korea. Landslides 4(4): 327-338. doi: 10. 1007/s10346-007-0088-x.
23. Long NT (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the mountainous area in A Luoi distric, Thua Thien Hue province, Vietnam. PhD Thesis, Vrije University Brussel, Brussel.
24. Magliulo P, Di Lisio A, Russo F, Zelano A (2008) Geomorphology and landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and bivariate statistics: a case study in southern Italy. Nat Hazards 47(3): 411-435. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-008-9230-x.
25. Menard SW (1995) Applied logistic regression analysis. SAGE, Thousand Oaks.
26. My NQ (2007) Construction of the environmental hazard zonation map for northwest territory of Vietnam. Vietnam Geography Association, Hanoi.
27. Nandi A, Shakoor A (2008) Application of logistic regression model for slope instability prediction in Cuyahoga River Watershed, Ohio, USA. Georisk 1: 12.
28. Ohlmacher GC (2007) Plan curvature and landslide probability in regions dominated by earth flows and earth slides. Eng Geol 91(2-4): 117-134. doi: 10. 1016/j. enggeo. 2007. 01. 005.
29. Ohlmacher GC, Davis JC (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng Geol 69(3-4): 331-343. doi: 10. 1016/s0013-7952(03)00069-3.
30. Oztekin B, Topal T (2005) GIS-based detachment susceptibility analyses of a cut slope in limestone, Ankara-Turkey. Environ Geol 49(1): 124-132. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-005-0071-6.
31. Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45(5): 665-679. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-003-0917-8.
32. Thach NN, Xuan NT, My NQ, Quynh PV, Minh ND, Hoa DB, Bao DV, Dan NV, Thuy TV, Hien NT (2002) Application of remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) for research and forecast of natural hazard in Hoa Binh province. National University Hanoi, Hanoi.
33. Thinh DV, Dong NP, Hong PM, Hung PV, Khoi TN, Ke TD, Phu DV, Thang PX, Thanh PV, Thang PH, Thay BV, Thinh NT, Thien TV, Tu MT, Vinh BX (2005) The investigated report of natural hazard in the Northwest of Vietnam Northern Geological Mapping Division, Hanoi.
34. van Den Eeckhaut M, Marre A, Poesen J (2006) Comparison of two landslide susceptibility assessments in the Champagne-Ardenne region (France). Geomorphology 115(1-2): 141-155. doi: 10. 1016/j. geomorph. 2009. 09. 042.
35. van Westen CJ (1997) Statistical landslide hazard analysis. ILWIS 2. 1 for Windows Application guide. ITC Publication, Enschede.
36. van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Terlien MTJ, Soeters R (1997) Prediction of the occurrence of slope instability phenomena through GIS-based hazard zonation. Geologische Rundschau 86(2): 404-414.
37. van TT, Tuy PK, Giap NX, Ke TD, Thai TN, Giang NT, Tho HM, Tuat LT, San DN, Hung LQ, Chung HT, Hoan NT (2002) Assessment and prediction of geological hazards in the 8 coastal provinces of central Vietnam from Quang Binh to Phu Yen-current status, causes, prediction and recommendation of remedial measures. Vietnam Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Hanoi.
38. van TT, Anh DT, Hieu HH, Giap NX, Ke TD, Nam TD, Ngoc D, Ngoc DTY, Thai TN, Thang DV, Tinh NV, Tuat LT, Tung NT, Tuy PK, Viet HA (2006) Investigation and assessment of the current status and potential of landslide in some sections of the Ho Chi Minh Road, National Road 1A and proposed remedial measures to prevent landslide from threat of safety of people, property, and infrastructure. Vietnam Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Hanoi.
39. Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO, Paris.
40. Wang HB, Liu GJ, Xu WY, Wang GH (2005) GIS-based landslide hazard assessment: an overview. Prog Phys Geogr 29(4): 548-567. doi: 10. 1191/0309133305pp462ra.
41. Wieczorek GF (1984) Preparing a detailed landslide-inventory map for hazard evaluation and reduction. Bull As Eng Geol 21(3): 337-342.
42. Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72(1): 1-12. doi: 10. 1016/j. catena. 2007. 01. 003.
43. Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79(3-4): 251-266. doi: 10. 1016/j. enggeo. 2005. 02. 002.
44. Yilmaz I (2009a) A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68(3): 297-306. doi: 10. 1007/s10064-009-0185-2.
45. Yilmaz I (2009b) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Comput Geosci 35(6): 1125-1138. doi: 10. 1016/j. cageo. 2008. 08. 007.
46. Yilmaz I (2010) The effect of the sampling strategies on the landslide susceptibility mapping by conditional probability and artificial neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 60(3): 505-519. doi: 10. 1007/s12665-009-0191-5.
47. Zhou G, Esaki T, Mitani Y, Xie M, Mori J (2003) Spatial probabilistic modeling of slope failure using an integrated GIS Monte Carlo simulation approach. Eng Geol 68(3-4): 373-386.