Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 152, Issue , 2014, Pages 150-165

  Jebur, Mustafa Neamah ^a   Pradhan, Biswajeet ^a   Tehrany, Mahyat Shafapour ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Conditioning factors; GIS; Landslide; LiDAR; Malaysia; Remote sensing; Susceptibility mapping

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOLOGY; LANDSLIDES; LASER APPLICATIONS; MAPPING; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; RUNOFF; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; SURFACE ANALYSIS;

AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING; HYDROLOGICAL PARAMETERS; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; MALAYSIA; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; TOPOGRAPHIC WETNESS INDEX; CATCHMENT SCALE; HIGH RESOLUTION;

FACTOR ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

CATCHMENT; DATABASE; GIS; LANDSLIDE; LIDAR; MAPPING METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; CONDITIONING; CURVATURE; DATA SET; REMOTE SENSING; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ZONATION;

MALAYSIA;

EID: 84903397388     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abdallah C., Chorowicz J., Bou Kheir R., Khawlie M. Detecting major terrain parameters relating to mass movements' occurrence using GIS, remote sensing and statistical correlations, case study Lebanon. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 99:448-461.
2. Althuwaynee O.F., Pradhan B., Lee S. Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Computers & Geosciences 2012, 44:120-135.
3. Ayalew L., Yamagishi H. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 2005, 65:15-31.
4. Ayalew L., Yamagishi H., Ugawa N. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 2004, 1:73-81.
5. Can T., Nefeslioglu H.A., Gokceoglu C., Sonmez H., Duman T.Y. Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three subcatchments by logistic regression analyses. Geomorphology 2005, 72:250-271.
6. Chang K.-T., Chiang S.-H., Hsu M.-L. Modeling typhoon-and earthquake-induced landslides in a mountainous watershed using logistic regression. Geomorphology 2007, 89:335-347.
7. Chauhan S., Sharma M., Arora M.K. Landslide susceptibility zonation of the Chamoli region, Garhwal Himalayas, using logistic regression model. Landslides 2010, 7:411-423.
8. Chen H., Lee C. A dynamic model for rainfall-induced landslides on natural slopes. Geomorphology 2003, 51:269-288.
9. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning 1995, 20:273-297.
10. Domínguez Cuesta M.J., Jiménez Sánchez M., Rodríguez García A. Press archives as temporal records of landslides in the North of Spain: relationships between rainfall and instability slope events. Geomorphology 1999, 30:125-132.
11. Domínguez-Cuesta M.J., Jiménez-Sánchez M., Berrezueta E. Landslides in the Central Coalfield (Cantabrian Mountains, NW Spain): Geomorphological features, conditioning factors and methodological implications in susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 2007, 89:358-369.
12. Donati L., Turrini M. An objective method to rank the importance of the factors predisposing to landslides with the GIS methodology: application to an area of the Apennines (Valnerina; Perugia, Italy). Engineering Geology 2002, 63:277-289.
13. Evett S.R., Tolk J.A., Howell T.A. Soil profile water content determination. Vadose Zone Journal 2006, 5:894-907.
14. García M., Riaño D., Chuvieco E., Salas J., Danson F.M. Multispectral and LiDAR data fusion for fuel type mapping using Support Vector Machine and decision rules. Remote Sensing of Environment 2011, 115:1369-1379.
15. Glenn N.F., Streutker D.R., Chadwick D.J., Thackray G.D., Dorsch S.J. Analysis of LiDAR-derived topographic information for characterizing and differentiating landslide morphology and activity. Geomorphology 2006, 73:131-148.
16. Gokceoglu C., Sonmez H., Nefeslioglu H.A., Duman T.Y., Can T. The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide-susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Engineering Geology 2005, 81:65-83.
17. Gorsevski P.V., Gessler P.E., Boll J., Elliot W.J., Foltz R.B. Spatially and temporally distributed modeling of landslide susceptibility. Geomorphology 2006, 80:178-198.
18. Guadagno F., Martino S., Mugnozza G.S. Influence of man-made cuts on the stability of pyroclastic covers (Campania, southern Italy): a numerical modelling approach. Environmental Geology 2003, 43:371-384.
19. Guzzetti F., Cardinali M., Reichenbach P., Carrara A. Comparing landslide maps: a case study in the upper Tiber River Basin, central Italy. Environmental Management 2000, 25:247-263.
20. Guzzetti F., Carrara A., Cardinali M., Reichenbach P. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 1999, 31:181-216.
21. Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P., Cardinali M., Galli M., Ardizzone F. Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology 2005, 72:272-299.
22. Huang R., Pei X., Fan X., Zhang W., Li S., Li B. The characteristics and failure mechanism of the largest landslide triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake, May 12, 2008, China. Landslides 2012, 9:131-142.
23. Jebur M.N., Pradhan B., Tehrany M.S. Using ALOS PALSAR derived high-resolution DInSAR to detect slow-moving landslides in tropical forest: Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 2013, 1-19. 10.1080/19475705.2013.860407.
24. Jebur M.N., Pradhan B., Tehrany M.S. Detection of vertical slope movement in highly vegetated tropical area of Gunung pass landslide, Malaysia, using L-band InSAR technique. Geosciences Journal 2014, 18(1):61-68. 10.1007/s12303-013-0053-8.
25. Jibson R.W., Keefer D.K. Statistical analysis of factors affecting landslide distribution in the New Madrid seismic zone, Tennessee and Kentucky. Engineering Geology 1989, 27:509-542.
26. Lee S., Choi J. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and the weight-of-evidence model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2004, 18:789-814.
27. Lee S., Pradhan B. Probabilistic landslide hazards and risk mapping on Penang Island, Malaysia. Journal of Earth System Science 2006, 115:661-672.
28. Lee S., Pradhan B. Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 2007, 4:33-41.
29. Lee S., Sambath T. Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environmental Geology 2006, 50:847-855.
30. Lefsky M., Cohen W., Spies T. An evaluation of alternate remote sensing products for forest inventory, monitoring, and mapping of Douglas-fir forests in western Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2001, 31:78-87.
31. Marjanović M., Kovačević M., Bajat B., Voženílek V. Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm. Engineering Geology 2011, 123:225-234.
32. Metternicht G., Hurni L., Gogu R. Remote sensing of landslides: an analysis of the potential contribution to geo-spatial systems for hazard assessment in mountainous environments. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 98:284-303.
33. Moreiras S.M. Landslide susceptibility zonation in the Rio Mendoza valley, Argentina. Geomorphology 2005, 66:345-357.
34. Nefeslioglu H., Sezer E., Gokceoglu C., Bozkir A., Duman T. Assessment of landslide susceptibility by decision trees in the metropolitan area of Istanbul, Turkey. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2010, 2010:1-15.
35. Oh H.J., Pradhan B. Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Computers & Geosciences 2011, 37:1264-1276.
36. Ozdemir A. Using a binary logistic regression method and GIS for evaluating and mapping the groundwater spring potential in the Sultan Mountains (Aksehir, Turkey). Journal of Hydrology 2011, 405:123-136.
37. Pourghasemi H.R., Jirandeh A.G., Pradhan B., Xu C., Gokceoglu C. Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran. Journal of Earth System Science 2013, 122:349-369.
38. Pourghasemi H.R., Pradhan B., Gokceoglu C. Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Natural Hazards 2012, 63:965-996.
39. Pourghasemi H., Pradhan B., Gokceoglu C., Moezzi K.D. Landslide susceptibility mapping using a spatial multi criteria evaluation model at Haraz Watershed, Iran. Terrigenous Mass Movements 2012, 23-49. Springer. B. Pradhan, M. Buchroithner (Eds.).
40. Pourghasemi H.R., Pradhan B., Gokceoglu C., Mohammadi M., Moradi H.R. Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 2012, 6:2351-2365.
41. Pradhan B. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Computers & Geosciences 2013, 51:350-365.
42. Pradhan B., Lee S. Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environmental Earth Sciences 2010, 60:1037-1054.
43. Pradhan B., Lee S. Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25:747-759.
44. Pradhan B., Lee S. Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides 2010, 7:13-30.
45. Pradhan B., Mansor S., Pirasteh S., Buchroithner M.F. Landslide hazard and risk analyses at a landslide prone catchment area using statistical based geospatial model. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2011, 32:4075-4087.
46. Pradhan B., Oh H.J., Buchroithner M. Weights-of-evidence model applied to landslide susceptibility mapping in a tropical hilly area. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 2010, 1:199-223.
47. Pradhan B., Sezer E.A., Gokceoglu C., Buchroithner M.F. Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2010, 48:4164-4177.
48. Pradhan B., Youssef A.M. Manifestation of remote sensing data and GIS on landslide hazard analysis using spatial-based statistical models. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 2010, 3:319-326.
49. Pradhan B., Youssef A., Varathrajoo R. Approaches for delineating landslide hazard areas using different training sites in an advanced artificial neural network model. Geo-spatial Information Science 2010, 13:93-102.
50. Ray R.L., Jacobs J.M., Cosh M.H. Landslide susceptibility mapping using downscaled AMSR-E soil moisture: A case study from Cleveland Corral, California, US. Remote Sensing of Environment 2010, 114:2624-2636.
51. Regmi N.R., Giardino J.R., Vitek J.D. Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology 2010, 115:172-187.
52. Samui P. Slope stability analysis: a support vector machine approach. Environmental Geology 2008, 56:255-267.
53. Tehrany M.S., Pradhan B., Jebu M.N. A comparative assessment between object and pixel-based classification approaches for land use/land cover mapping using SPOT 5 imagery. Geocarto International 2013, 1-19. 10.1080/10106049.2013.768300.
54. Tehrany M.S., Pradhan B., Jebur M.N. Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology 2013, 504:69-79.
55. Tehrany M.S., Pradhan B., Jebur M.N. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology 2014, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008.
56. Tien Bui D., Pradhan B., Lofman O., Revhaug I. Landslide susceptibility assessment in vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and Naive Bayes Models. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012, 2012:1-15.
57. Tien Bui D., Pradhan B., Lofman O., Revhaug I., Dick O.B. Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena 2012, 96:28-40.
58. Van Westen C., Rengers N., Soeters R. Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Natural Hazards 2003, 30:399-419.
59. Wilson J.P., Gallant J.C. Terrain analysis: principles and applications 2000, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
60. Yao X., Tham L., Dai F. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology 2008, 101:572-582.
61. Yilmaz I. A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2009, 68:297-306.
62. Zêzere J.L.S., de Brum Ferreira A., Rodrigues M.L.S. The role of conditioning and triggering factors in the occurrence of landslides: a case study in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal). Geomorphology 1999, 30:133-146.
63. Zhu L., Huang J.-F. GIS-based logistic regression method for landslide susceptibility mapping in regional scale. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A 2006, 7:2007-2017.