A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping

Catena

Volumn 114, Issue , 2014, Pages 21-36

  Althuwaynee, Omar F ^a   Pradhan, Biswajeet ^a   Park, Hyuck Jin ^b   Lee, Jung Hyun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b Sejong University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Ensemble model; Geographic information system (GIS); Landslide susceptibility; Remote sensing; South Korea

Indexed keywords

DATABASE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSLIDE; MAPPING METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOPOGRAPHY; WEIGHT;

GYEONGJU; NORTH KYONGSANG; POHANG; SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 84888082316     PISSN: 03418162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Akgun A., Kincal C. Landslide risk as an environmental threat for Izmir (West Turkey) City and its urban expansion. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts 2010, 11249.
2. Akgun A., Türk N. Landslide susceptibility mapping for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) and its vicinity by multicriteria decision analysis. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 61:595-611.
3. Akgun A., Sezer E.A., Nefeslioglu H.A., Gokceoglu C., Pradhan B. An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 38(1):23-34.
4. Aleotti P., Chowdhury R. Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 1999, 58:21-44.
5. Althuwaynee O.F., Pradhan B., Lee S. Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 44:120-135.
6. Althuwaynee O.F., Pradhan B., Mahmud A.R., Yusoff Z.M. Prediction of slope failures using bivariate statistical based index of entropy model, Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER). IEEE Colloq. IEEE 2012, 362-367.
7. Ayalew L., Yamagishi H. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 2005, 65:15-31.
8. Ayalew L., Yamagishi H., Marui H., Kanno T. Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications. Eng. Geol. 2005, 81:432-445.
9. Bai S., Lü G., Wang J., Zhou P., Ding L. GIS-based rare events logistic regression for landslide-susceptibility mapping of Lianyungang, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 62:139-149.
10. Bai S., Wang J., Zhang Z., Cheng C. Combined landslide susceptibility mapping after Wenchuan earthquake at the Zhouqu segment in the Bailongjiang Basin, China. Catena 2012, 99:18-25.
11. Bartlett P., Shawe-Taylor J. Generalization performance of support vector machines and other pattern classifiers. Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Learning 1999, 43-54.
12. Beven K., Kirkby M. Un modèle à base physique de zone d'appel variable de l'hydrologie du bassin versant. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1979, 24:43-69.
13. Bonham-Carter G.F. Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modelling with GIS 1994, Pegamon Press, Oxford.
14. Boots B.N., Getis A. Point Pattern Analysis 1988, SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
15. Broothaerts N., Kissi E., Poesen J., Van Rompaey A., Getahun K., Van Ranst E., Diels J. Spatial patterns, causes and consequences of landslides in the Gilgel Gibe catchment, SW Ethiopia. Catena 2012, 97:127-136.
16. Bühlmann P., Yu B. Boosting with the L 2 loss: regression and classification. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2003, 98:324-339.
17. Bui D., Lofman O., Revhaug I., Dick O. Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression. Nat. Hazards 2011, 59:1413-1444.
18. Carranza E.J.M. Controls on mineral deposit occurrence inferred from analysis of their spatial pattern and spatial association with geological features. Ore Geol. Rev. 2009, 35:383-400.
19. Che V.B., Kervyn M., Suh C., Fontijn K., Ernst G., del Marmol M.-A., Trefois P., Jacobs P. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Limbe (SW Cameroon): a field calibrated seed cell and information value method. Catena 2012, 92:83-98.
20. Crozier M.J. Prediction of rainfall-triggered landslides: a test of the Antecedent Water Status Model. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 1999, 24:825-833.
21. Dai F., Lee C. Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 2002, 42:213-228.
22. Dempster A.P. Upper and lower probabilities generated by a random closed interval. Ann. Math. Stat. 1968, 39:957-966.
23. Devkota K., Regmi A., Pourghasemi H., Yoshida K., Pradhan B., Ryu I., Dhital M., Althuwaynee O. Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat. Hazards 2013, 65:135-165.
24. Dimitriadou E., Weingessel A., Hornik K. A Cluster Ensembles Framework, Design and Application of Hybrid Intelligent Systems 2003, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
25. Domínguez-Cuesta M.J., Jiménez-Sánchez M., Berrezueta E. Landslides in the Central Coalfield (Cantabrian Mountains, NW Spain): geomorphological features, conditioning factors and methodological implications in susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 2007, 89:358-369.
26. Ghosh J., Acharya A. Cluster ensembles. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2011, 1:305-315.
27. Ghosh S., Carranza E.J.M., van Westen C.J., Jetten V.G., Bhattacharya D.N. Selecting and weighting spatial predictors for empirical modeling of landslide susceptibility in the Darjeeling Himalayas (India). Geomorphology 2011, 131:35-56.
28. Hengl T. Finding the right pixel size. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 32:1283-1298.
29. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression 2000, Wiley-Interscience.
30. Huabin W., Gangjun L., Weiya X., Gonghui W. GIS-based landslide hazard assessment: an overview. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2005, 29:548-567.
31. Ishizaka A., Labib A. Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: benefits and limitations. OR Insight 2009, 22:201-220.
32. Jenness E. An ArcGis Extension for Analyzing Raster Elevation Dataset 2011, Jenness Enterprises, Flagstaff, AZ 86004 USA.
33. Kayastha P., Dhital M., De Smedt F. Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 52:398-408.
34. Kusky T.M. Landslides: Mass Wasting, Soil, and Mineral Hazards 2008, Facts on File, New York.
35. Lange K. Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Genetic Analysis 2002, Springer Verlag.
36. Lee S. Application of likelihood ratio and logistic regression models to landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Environ. Manag. 2004, 34:223-232.
37. Lee S., Min K. Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ. Geol. 2001, 40:1095-1113.
38. Lee S., Oh H.-J. Ensemble-based Landslide Susceptibility Maps in Jinbu Area, Korea, Terrigenous Mass Movements 2012, 193-220. Springer.
39. Lee S., Ryu J.H., Won J.S., Park H.J. Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng. Geol. 2004, 71:289-302.
40. Lee S., Ryu J.-H., Kim I.-S. Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models: case study of Youngin, Korea. Landslides 2007, 4:327-338.
41. Lee S., Hwang J., Park I. Application of data-driven evidential belief functions to landslide susceptibility mapping in Jinbu, Korea. Catena 2013, 100:15-30.
42. Malczewski J. GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis 1999, John Willey and Sons, New York.
43. Martha T.R., van Westen C.J., Kerle N., Jetten V., Kumar K.V. Landslide hazard and risk assessment using semi-automatically created landslide inventories. Geomorphology 2012, 184:139-150.
44. Mathew J., Jha V., Rawat G. Application of binary logistic regression analysis and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping in part of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2007, 28:2257-2275.
45. Menard S. Coefficients of determination for multiple logistic regression analysis. Am. Stat. 2000, 54:17-24.
46. Mohammady M., Pourghasemi H.R., Pradhan B. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2012, 61:221-236.
47. Mugagga F., Kakembo V., Buyinza M. Land use changes on the slopes of Mount Elgon and the implications for the occurrence of landslides. Catena 2012, 90:39-46.
48. Nefeslioglu H., Gokceoglu C., Sonmez H. An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Eng. Geol. 2008, 97:171-191.
49. Oh H.-J., Pradhan B. Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput. Geosci. 2011, 37:1264-1276.
50. Ohlmacher G.C., Davis J.C. Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng. Geol. 2003, 69:331-343.
51. Park N.-W. Application of Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence to GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 62:367-376.
52. Pereira J.M.C., Duckstein L. A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 1993, 7:407-424.
53. Pourghasemi H.R., Pradhan B., Gokceoglu C. Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat. Hazards 2012, 63:965-996.
54. Pourghasemi H.R., Mohammadi M., Pradhan B. Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models at Safarood Basin, Iran. Catena 2012, 97:71-84. 10.1016/j.catena.2012.05.005.
55. Pourghasemi H.R., Moradi H.R., Fatemi Aghda S.M., Gokceoglu C., Pradhan B. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping with probabilistic likelihood ratio and spatial multi criteria evaluation models (North of Tehran, Iran). Arab. J. Geosci. 2013, (Article online first available). 10.1007/s12517-012-0825-x.
56. Pourghasemi H.R., Pradhan B., Gokceoglu C., Moezzi K.D. A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster-Shafer and weights of evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 2013, 4(2):93-118. 10.1080/19475705.2012.662915.
57. Pradhan B. Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing 2010, 38:301-320.
58. Pradhan B. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput. Geosci. 2013, 51:350-365.
59. Pradhan B., Youssef A.M., Varathrajoo R. Approaches for delineating landslide hazard areas using different training sites in an advanced artificial neural network model. Geospat. Inf. Sci. 2010, 13(2):93-102.
60. Pradhan B., Mansor S., Pirasteh S., Buchroithner M.F. Landslide hazard and risk analyses at a landslide prone catchment area using statistical based geospatial model. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32(14):4075-4087.
61. Rokach L. Ensemble-based classifiers. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2010, 33:1-39.
62. Saaty T.L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 1977, 15:234-281.
63. Saaty T.L. Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, Wiley Online Library.
64. Sassa K., Canuti P. Landslides - Disaster Risk Reduction 2008, Springer.
65. Schicker R., Moon V. Comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping at a regional scale. Geomorphology 2012, 162:40-57.
66. Schmidt K., Roering J., Stock J., Dietrich W., Montgomery D., Schaub T. The variability of root cohesion as an influence on shallow landslide susceptibility in the Oregon Coast Range. Can. Geotech. J. 2001, 38:995-1024.
67. Stocking M.A. Relief analysis and soil erosion in Rhodesia using multivariate techniques. Z. Geomorphol. 1972, 16:432-443.
68. Strahler A.N. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 1957, 38:913-920.
69. Süzen M.L., Doyuran V. A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ. Geol. 2004, 45:665-679.
70. Tehrany M.S., Pradhan B., Jebur M.N. Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models. J. Hydrol. 2013, (Article online first available). 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034.
71. Tien Bui D., Pradhan B., Lofman O., Revhaug I., Dick O.B. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and GIS. Comput. Geosci. 2011, 45:199-211. 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.031.
72. Tien Bui D., Pradhan B., Lofman O., Revhaug I., Dick O.B. Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam: a comparison of the Levenberg-Marquardt and Bayesian regularized neural networks. Geomorphology 2012, 171:12-29.
73. Tien Bui D., Pradhan B., Lofman O., Revhaug I., Dick O.B. Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena 2012, 96:28-40.
74. Tien Bui D., Pradhan B., Lofman O., Revhaug I. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Vietnam Using Support Vector Machines, Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes Models 2012, 1-26. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, (http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/aip/974638/).
75. Tien Bui, D., Ho, C.T., Revhaug, I., Pradhan, B., Nguyen, D.B., 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping along the National Road 32 of Vietnam using GIS-based J48 decision tree classifier and its ensembles in M. Buchroithner et al. (eds.), Cartography from Pole to Pole, Chapter 21. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32618-9_21, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32618-9_22.
76. Tobler W. Measuring spatial resolution. Proceedings, Land Resources Information Systems Conference 1987, 12-16.
77. Tumer K., Ghosh J. Robust Order Statistics Based Ensembles for Distributed Data Mining 2001, DTIC Document.
78. Van Den Eeckhaut M., Hervás J., Jaedicke C., Malet J.P., Montanarella L., Nadim F. Statistical modelling of Europe-wide landslide susceptibility using limited landslide inventory data. Landslides 2012, 9:357-369.
79. Van Westen C.J., van Asch T.W.J., Soeters R. Landslide hazard and risk zonation - why is it still so difficult?. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2006, 65:167-184.
80. Varnes D. The International Association of Engineering Geology Commission on Landslides and Other Mass Movements on Slopes. Natural Hazard 1984, 3:63. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
81. Xu C., Xu X., Yao X., Dai F. Three (nearly) complete inventories of landslides triggered by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake of China and their spatial distribution statistical analysis. Landslides 2013, 1-21.
82. Yalcin A., Reis S., Aydinoglu A., Yomralioglu T. A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 2011, 85:274-287.
83. Zare M., Pourghasemi H.R., Vafakhah M., Pradhan B. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arab. J. Geosci. 2012, 5:1-16.