Author Correction: Selective advantage of trisomic human cells cultured in non-standard conditions (Scientific Reports, (2016), 6, 1, (22828), 10.1038/srep22828);Selective advantage of trisomic human cells cultured in non-standard conditions

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Rutledge, Samuel D ^a,b   Douglas, Temple A ^b,c   Nicholson, Joshua M ^a,b   Vila Casadesús, Maria ^d   Kantzler, Courtney L ^a,b   Wangsa, Darawalee ^e   Barroso Vilares, Monika ^f   Kale, Shiv D ^b   Logarinho, Elsa ^f,g   Cimini, Daniela ^a,b  

^a Department of Biological Sciences ^*  (United States)

^b VIRGINIA BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III   (Spain)

^e NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^g University of Porto   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; EPITHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; TRISOMY;

CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; EPITHELIAL CELLS; HUMANS; TRISOMY;

EID: 84959009777     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19297-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (60)

1. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646-674, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 (2011).
2. Cimini, D. Merotelic kinetochore orientation, aneuploidy, and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1786, 32-40, doi: 10.1016/j. bbcan.2008.05.003 (2008).
3. Nicholson, J. M. & Cimini, D. How mitotic errors contribute to karyotypic diversity in cancer. Adv Cancer Res 112, 43-75, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387688-1.00003-X (2011).
4. Mitelman, F., Johansson, B. & Mertens, F. Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations and Gene Fusions in Cancer http://cgap. nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman (2014).
5. Boveri, T. Zur Frage der Entstehung maligner Tumoren. (Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1914).
6. Boveri, T. Concerning the origin of malignant tumours by Theodor Boveri. Translated and annotated by Henry Harris. J Cell Sci 121, Supplement 1 1-84 (2008).
7. Torres, E. M., Williams, B. R. & Amon, A. Aneuploidy: cells losing their balance. Genetics 179, 737-746, doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.090878 (2008).
8. Hassold, T. & Hunt, P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2, 280-291, doi: 10.1038/35066065 (2001).
9. Biesecker, L. G. & Spinner, N. B. A genomic view of mosaicism and human disease. Nat Rev Genet 14, 307-320, doi: 10.1038/nrg3424 (2013).
10. Williams, B. R. et al. Aneuploidy affects proliferation and spontaneous immortalization in mammalian cells. Science 322, 703-709, doi: 10.1126/science.1160058 (2008).
11. Torres, E. M. et al. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317, 916-924, doi: 10.1126/science.1142210 (2007).
12. Selmecki, A., Forche, A. & Berman, J. Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science 313, 367-370, doi: 10.1126/science.1128242 (2006).
13. Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS genetics 5, e1000705, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000705 (2009).
14. Rancati, G. et al. Aneuploidy underlies rapid adaptive evolution of yeast cells deprived of a conserved cytokinesis motor. Cell 135, 879-893, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.039 (2008).
15. Millet, C., Ausiannikava, D., Le Bihan, T., Granneman, S. & Makovets, S. Cell populations can use aneuploidy to survive telomerase insufficiency. Nat Commun 6, 8664, doi: 10.1038/ncomms9664 (2015).
16. Kaya, A. et al. Adaptive aneuploidy protects against thiol peroxidase deficiency by increasing respiration via key mitochondrial proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 10685-10690, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505315112 (2015).
17. Pavelka, N. et al. Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 468, 321-325, doi: 10.1038/nature09529 (2010).
18. Duncan, A. W. et al. Aneuploidy as a mechanism for stress-induced liver adaptation. The Journal of clinical investigation 122, 3307-3315, doi: 10.1172/JCI64026 (2012).
19. Duncan, A. W. et al. The ploidy conveyor of mature hepatocytes as a source of genetic variation. Nature 467, 707-710, doi: 10.1038/nature09414 (2010).
20. Fox, D. T., Gall, J. G. & Spradling, A. C. Error-prone polyploid mitosis during normal Drosophila development. Genes Dev 24, 2294-2302, doi: 10.1101/gad.1952710 (2010).
21. Schoenfelder, K. P. et al. Indispensable pre-mitotic endocycles promote aneuploidy in the Drosophila rectum. Development 141, 3551-3560, doi: 10.1242/dev.109850 (2014).
22. Nicholson, J. M. & Cimini, D. Cancer karyotypes: survival of the fittest. Frontiers in oncology 3, 148, doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00148 (2013).
23. Weaver, B. A. & Cleveland, D. W. Does aneuploidy cause cancer? Curr Opin Cell Biol 18, 658-667, doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.10.002 (2006).
24. Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 386, 623-627, doi: 10.1038/386623a0 (1997).
25. Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J Cell Biol 180, 665-672, doi: 10.1083/jcb.200712029 (2008).
26. Upender, M. B. et al. Chromosome transfer induced aneuploidy results in complex dysregulation of the cellular transcriptome in immortalized and cancer cells. Cancer Res 64, 6941-6949, doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0474 (2004).
27. Nicholson, J. M. et al. Chromosome mis-segregation and cytokinesis failure in trisomic human cells. eLife 4, doi: 10.7554/eLife.05068 (2015).
28. Ried, T. et al. The consequences of chromosomal aneuploidy on the transcriptome of cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819, 784-793, doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.02.020 (2012).
29. Bardi, G. et al. Karyotypic characterization of colorectal adenocarcinomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 12, 97-109 (1995).
30. Shin, S. I., Freedman, V. H., Risser, R. & Pollack, R. Tumorigenicity of virus-transformed cells in nude mice is correlated specifically with anchorage independent growth in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72, 4435-4439 (1975).
31. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57-70 (2000).
32. Zheng, L., Kelly, C. J. & Colgan, S. P. Physiologic hypoxia and oxygen homeostasis in the healthy intestine. A Review in the Theme: Cellular Responses to Hypoxia. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 309, C350-360, doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00191.2015 (2015).
33. Chen, G. et al. Targeting the adaptability of heterogeneous aneuploids. Cell 160, 771-784, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.026 (2015).
34. Ly, P. et al. Characterization of aneuploid populations with trisomy 7 and 20 derived from diploid human colonic epithelial cells. Neoplasia 13, 348-357 (2011).
35. Gao, C. et al. Chromosome instability, chromosome transcriptome, and clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 8995-9000, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700631104 (2007).
36. Stingele, S. et al. Global analysis of genome, transcriptome and proteome reveals the response to aneuploidy in human cells. Molecular systems biology 8, 608, doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.40 (2012).
37. Habermann, J. K. et al. Stage-specific alterations of the genome, transcriptome, and proteome during colorectal carcinogenesis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 46, 10-26, doi: 10.1002/gcc.20382 (2007).
38. Gemoll, T. et al. Chromosomal aneuploidy affects the global proteome equilibrium of colorectal cancer cells. Analytical cellular pathology 36, 149-161, doi: 10.3233/ACP-140088 (2013).
39. Sheltzer, J. M. et al. Aneuploidy drives genomic instability in yeast. Science 333, 1026-1030, doi: 10.1126/science.1206412 (2011).
40. Tan, Z. et al. Aneuploidy underlies a multicellular phenotypic switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 12367-12372, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301047110 (2013).
41. Zhu, J., Pavelka, N., Bradford, W. D., Rancati, G. & Li, R. Karyotypic determinants of chromosome instability in aneuploid budding yeast. PLoS genetics 8, e1002719, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002719 (2012).
42. Selmecki, A., Gerami-Nejad, M., Paulson, C., Forche, A. & Berman, J. An isochromosome confers drug resistance in vivo by amplification of two genes, ERG11 and TAC1. Molecular microbiology 68, 624-641, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06176.x (2008).
43. Biron-Shental, T., Liberman, M., Sharvit, M., Sukenik-Halevy, R. & Amiel, A. Amniocytes from aneuploidy embryos have enhanced random aneuploidy and signs of senescence-Can these findings be related to medical problems? Gene, doi: 10.1016/j. gene.2015.02.075 (2015).
44. Duesberg, P., Rausch, C., Rasnick, D. & Hehlmann, R. Genetic instability of cancer cells is proportional to their degree of aneuploidy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 13692-13697 (1998).
45. Reish, O. et al. Sporadic aneuploidy in PHA-stimulated lymphocytes of Turner's syndrome patients. Chromosome Res 14, 527-534, doi: 10.1007/s10577-006-1050-9 (2006).
46. Reish, O., Regev, M., Kanesky, A., Girafi, S. & Mashevich, M. Sporadic aneuploidy in PHA-stimulated lymphocytes of trisomies 21, 18, and 13. Cytogenet Genome Res 133, 184-189, doi: 10.1159/000323504 (2011).
47. Nicholson, J. M. & Cimini, D. Link between Aneuploidy and Chromosome Instability. International review of cell and molecular biology 315, 299-317, doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2014.11.002 (2015).
48. Ben-David, U. et al. Aneuploidy induces profound changes in gene expression, proliferation and tumorigenicity of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun 5, 4825, doi: 10.1038/ncomms5825 (2014).
49. Dephoure, N. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals posttranslational responses to aneuploidy in yeast. eLife 3, e03023, doi: 10.7554/eLife.03023 (2014).
50. Sheltzer, J. M., Torres, E. M., Dunham, M. J. & Amon, A. Transcriptional consequences of aneuploidy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 12644-12649, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209227109 (2012).
51. Dürrbaum, M. et al. Unique features of the transcriptional response to model aneuploidy in human cells. BMC Genomics 15, 139, doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-139 (2014).
52. Dewhurst, S. M. et al. Tolerance of whole-genome doubling propagates chromosomal instability and accelerates cancer genome evolution. Cancer discovery 4, 175-185, doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0285 (2014).
53. Kuznetsova, A. Y. et al. Chromosomal instability, tolerance of mitotic errors and multidrug resistance are promoted by tetraploidization in human cells. Cell Cycle 14, 2810-2820, doi: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1068482 (2015).
54. Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 396, 643-649 (1998).
55. Weaver, B. A. & Cleveland, D. W. Aneuploidy: instigator and inhibitor of tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 67, 10103-10105, doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2266 (2007).
56. Carter, S. L., Eklund, A. C., Kohane, I. S., Harris, L. N. & Szallasi, Z. A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers. Nat Genet 38, 1043-1048, doi: 10.1038/ng1861 (2006).
57. Walther, A., Houlston, R. & Tomlinson, I. Association between chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis. Gut 57, 941-950, doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.135004 (2008).
58. Lee, A. J. et al. Chromosomal instability confers intrinsic multidrug resistance. Cancer Res 71, 1858-1870, doi: 10.1158/0008-5472. CAN-10-3604 (2011).
59. Swanton, C. et al. Chromosomal instability determines taxane response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 8671-8676, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811835106 (2009).
60. Hojsgaard, S., Halekoh, U. & J, Y. The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw 15, 1-11 (2006).