Examining the factors affecting PDA acceptance among physicians: An extended technology acceptance model

Journal of Healthcare Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 399-418

  Basak, Ecem ^a   Gumussoy, Cigdem Altin ^a   Calisir, Fethi ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Perceived enjoyment; Personal digital assistant; Personal innovativeness; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

EXTENDED TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODELS; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED ENJOYMENT; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS (PDA); PERSONAL INNOVATIVENESS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS;

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; SELF CONCEPT; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); WORK EXPERIENCE; BEHAVIOR; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN; TECHNOLOGY; TURKEY;

HUMANS; INTENTION; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIANS; TECHNOLOGY; TURKEY;

EID: 84958598552     PISSN: 20402295     EISSN: 20402309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1260/2040-2295.6.3.399     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Carroll AE, Christakis DA. Pediatricians and personal digital assistants: What type are they using? Conf Proc AMIA Symposium. 2003, 130-134.
2. Tooey MJ, Mayo A. Handheld technologies in a clinical setting: state of the technology and resources. AACN Clin. Issues. 2003, 14(3):342.
3. Guerrieri R, Kokinova M. Does instruction in the use of personal digital assistants increase medical students' comfort and skill level?. Medical Reference Services Quarterly. 2009, 28(1):33-43.
4. Luanrattana R, Win KT, Fulcher J, Iverson D. Mobile technology use in medical education. Journal of Medical Systems. 2012, 36(1):113-22.
5. Malone DC, Saverno KR. Evaluation of a wireless handheld medication management device in the prevention of drug-drug interactions in a medicaid population. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy. 2012, 18(1):33-45.
6. Kitchiner R The role of the personal digital assistant (PDA) in chiropractic practice. Clinical Chiropractic. 2006, 9(3):119-128.
7. Phua J, Lim TK. How residents and interns utilise and perceive the personal digital assistant and UpToDate. BMC Medical Education. 2008, 8 (39).
8. Johansson P, Petersson G, Nilsson G. Experience of using a personal digital assistant in nursing practice - a single case study. Journal of Nursing Management. 2011, 19(7):855-62.
9. Davies BS, Rafique J, Vincent TR, Fairclough J, Packer MH, Vincent R, Haq I. Mobile Medical Education (MoMEd) - How mobile information resources contribute to learning for undergraduate clinical students - a mixed methods study. BMC Medical Education. 2012, 12(1):1-11.
10. Wu J-H, Wang S-C, Lin L-M. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2007, 76(1):66-77.
11. Kuziemsky CE, Laul F, Leung RC. A Review on Diffusion of Personal Digital Assistants in Healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems. 2005, 29(4):335-342.
12. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis FD, Davis GB. User acceptance of information tehcnology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003, 27(3):425-478.
13. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
14. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology?: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 1989, 35(8):982-1003.
15. Agarwal R, Prasad J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?. Decision Sciences. 1999, 30 (2).
16. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989, 13(3):319-340.
17. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management. 2003, 40(3):191-204.
18. Wu J-H, Wang S-C. What drives mobile commerce?. Information & Management. 2005, 42(5):719-729.
19. Morrisey MA. Healthcare. 2008. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved April 17, 2015 from the World Wide Web: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/HealthCare.html
20. Dasgupta A, Sansgiry SS, Sherer JT, Wallace D, Sikri S. Application of the extended technology acceptance model in predicting pharmacists' intention to use personal digital assistants. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2009, 49(6):792-796.
21. Fox BI. Explaining pharmacists' intention to use personal digital assistants as clinical resources during patient care interventions. PhD dissertation, Aurburn University, 2005.
22. Kuiper R. Metacognitive factors that impact student nurse use of point of care technology in clinical settings. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2010, 7 (1).
23. Siracuse MV, Sowell JG. Doctor of pharmacy students' use of personal digital assistants. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2008, 72(1):7.
24. Yi MY, Jackson JD, Park JS, Probst JC. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Information & Management. 2006, 43(3):350-363.
25. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research. 2000, 1997(4):342-365.
26. Venkatesh V, Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science. 2000, 46(2):186-204.
27. Moon J, Kim Y. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management. 2001, 38(4):217-230.
28. Van der Heijden H. Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management. 2003, 40(6):541-549.
29. Joseph A. Comparing the usability of Apple and Plam handheld computing devices among physicians: A randomized crossover study. Master thesis, Duke University, 2009.
30. Vishwanath A, Brodsky L, Shaha S. Physician adoption of personal digital assistants (PDA): testing its determinants within a structural equation model. Journal of Health Communication. 2009, 14(1):77-95.
31. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991, 50(2):179-211.
32. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research. 1991, 2(3):173-191.
33. Ajzen I, Madden TJ, Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1986, 22(5):453-474.
34. Barnes SJ, Vidgen, R. User acceptance and corporate intranet quality: An evaluation with iQual. Information & Management, 2012, 49(3-4):164-170.
35. Cheung R, Vogel, D. Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computer & Education, 2013, 63:160-175.
36. Motaghian H, Hassanzadeh A, Moghadam DK. Factors affecting university instructors' adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran. Computer & Education, 2013, 61:158-167.
37. Dale JC, LeFlore J. Personal digital assistants: making the most use of them in clinical practice. Journal of Pediatric Healthcare. 2007, 21(5):339-42.
38. Adigüzel T, Capraro RM, Willson VL. An examination of handheld computers. International Journal of Special Education. 2011, 26(3):12-27.
39. Wu I-L, Li J-Y, Fu C-Y. The adoption of mobile healthcare by hospital's professionals: An integrative perspective. Decision Support Systems. 2011, 51(3):587-596.
40. Braun MT. Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(3):673-680.
41. De grove F, Bourgonjon J, Van Looy J. Digital games in the classroom? A contextual approach to teachers' adoption intention of digital games in formal education. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, 28(6):2023-2033.
42. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1992, 22(14):1111-1132.
43. Lee MKO, Cheung CMK, Chen Z. Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management. 2005, 42(8):1095-1104.
44. Zhang L, Zhu J, Liu Q. A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012, 28(5):1902-1911.
45. Domina T, Lee SE, MacGillivray M. Understanding factors affecting consumer intention to shop in a virtual world. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2012, 19(6):613-620.
46. Mäntymäki M, Salo J. Teenagers in social virtual worlds: Continuous use and purchasing behavior in Habbo Hotel. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(6):2088-2097.
47. Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 1993, 38(3):475-478.
48. Hackbarth G, Grover V, Yi, MY. Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management. 2003, 40(3):221-232.
49. Bruner GC, Kumar A. Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of Business Research. 2005, 58(5):553-558.
50. Ha I, Yoon Y, Choi M. Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management. 2007, 44(3):276-286.
51. Bhatti T. Exploring factors influencing the adoption of mobile commerce. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce. 2007, 12 (3).
52. Kim H, Kim T, Shin SW. Modeling roles of subjective norms and e-trust in customers' acceptance of airline B2C e-vommerce websites. Tourism Management. 2009, 30(2):266-277.
53. Lambert DM, Harrington TC. Measuring nonresponse bias in customer service mail surveys, Journal of Business Logistics, 1990, 11(2):5-25.
54. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations, 4th ed., Free Press, New York, 1995.
55. Agarwal R, Prasad J. The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption. Decision Support Systems. 1998, 22(1):15-29.
56. Lu J, Yao JE, Yu C-S. Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2005, 14(3):245-268.
57. Lewis W, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V. Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empiric study. MIS Quarterly. 2003, 27(4):657-678.
58. Bandura A, McClelland DC. Social learning theory, Prentice Hall, 1977, 305-316.
59. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1986.
60. Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly. 1995, 19(2):189.
61. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences. 1996, 27(3):451-481.
62. Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V, Stair RM. Research report?: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy - An emprical assesment. Information Systems Research. 2000, 11(4):418-430.
63. Thompson R, Compeau D, Ontario W. Intentions to use information technologies?: An Integrative Model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. 2006, 18(3):22.
64. Gu J-C, Lee S-C, Suh Y-H. Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications. 2009, 36(9):11605-11616.
65. Taylor S, Todd P. Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 1995, 12(2):137-155.
66. Armstrong JS, Overton TS. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 1977, 14(3):396-402.
67. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended twostep approach. Psychological Bulletin. 1988, 103(3):411-423.
68. Jöreskog, K, Sörbom D. LISREL software, v8.80, Scientific Software International, Chicago, 2006.
69. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC, Multivariate data analysis, 5th ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood cliffs, New Jersey, 1998.
70. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Phillips LW. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1991, 36(3):421.
71. Fornell C, Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981, 18(1):39-50.
72. Chen L, Gillenson ML, Sherrell DL. Consumer acceptance of virtual stores: A theoretical model and critical success factors for virtual stores. ACM SIGMIS Database. 2004, 35 (2).
73. Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA. Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated, SAGE Publications, 2000.
74. Roca JC, Chiu C-M, Martínez FJ. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2006, 64(8):683-696.
75. Chen J, Park Y, Putzer G. An examination of the components that increase acceptance of smartphones among healthcare professionals. Electronic Journal of Health Informatics. 2010, 5(2):1-12.
76. Roca JC, Gagné M. Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A selfdetermination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior. 2008, 24(4):1585-1604.
77. Son H, Park Y, Kim C, Chou J-S. Toward an understanding of construction professionals' acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Automation in Construction. 2012, 28:82-90.
78. Jan AU, Contreras V. Technology acceptance model for the use of information technology in universities. Computers in Human Behavior. 2011, 27(2):845-851.