The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 15-29

  Agarwal, Ritu ^a,c   Prasad, Jayesh ^b,d  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON   (United States)

^c INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT CALCUTTA   (India)

^d INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Communication channels; Expert system adoption; Information technology adoption; Personal innovativeness

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); DECISION MAKING; EXPERT SYSTEMS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

PERSONAL INNOVATIVENESS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0031707633     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9236(97)00006-7     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. D.A. Adams, R.R. Nelson, P.A. Todd, Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication, MIS Quarterly 16 (1992) 227-247.
2. I. Ajzen, M. Fishbein, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
3. R.M. Baron, D.A. Kenny, The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1173-1182.
4. J.C. Brancheau, J.C. Wetherbe, The adoption of spreadsheet software: testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing, Information Systems Research 1 (1990) 41-64.
5. L.A. Brown, Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective, Methuen, New York.
6. T. Burns, G. Stalker, The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London, 1961.
7. R. Cooper, R.W. Zmud, Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach, Management Science 36 (2) (1990) 123-139.
8. L.J. Cronbach, Essentials of Psychological Testing, Harper & Row, New York, 1970.
9. R.L. Daft, R.H. Lengel, Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design, Management Science 32 (1986) 554-571.
10. T.H. Davenport, J.E. Short, The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign, Sloan Management Review (1990) 11-27.
11. F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly 13 (1989) 318-339.
12. F.D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38 (1993) 475-487.
13. F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi, P.R. Warshaw, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science 35 (1989) 982-1003.
14. A.L. Delbecq, P.K. Mills, Managerial practices that enhance innovation, Organizational Dynamics 14 (1985) 24-34.
15. W.H. DeLone, E.R. McLean, Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research 3 (1992) 60-95.
16. L. Fidler, J.D. Johnson, Communication and innovation implementation, Academy of Management Review 9 (1984) 704-711.
17. M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
18. P. Fishburn, Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York, 1970.
19. L.R. Flynn, R.E. Goldsmith, A validation of the Goldsmith and Hofacker innovativeness scale, Educational and Psychological Measurement 53 (1993) 1105-1116.
20. K.F. Goss, Consequences of diffusion of innovations, Rural Sociology 44 (1979) 754-772.
21. M. Keil, P.M. Beranek, B.R. Konsynski, Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations, Decision Support Systems 13 (1995) 75-91.
22. T.H. Kwon, R.W. Zmud, Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation, in: R. Boland, R.A. Hirscheim, (Eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, Wiley, Chichester, 1987.
23. J.-J. Laffont, The Economics of Uncertainty and Information, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. D. Leonard-Barton, I. Deschamps, Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology, Management Science 34 (1988) 1252-1265.
25. A.E. Liska, A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude-behavior model, Social Psychology Quarterly 47 (1984) 61-74.
26. H. Lucas, Performance and the use of information systems, Management Science 21 (1975) 908-919.
27. V. Mahajan, E. Muller, F.M. Bass, New product diffusion models in marketing: a review and directions for research, Journal of Marketing 54 (1990) 1-26.
28. K. Mathieson, Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior, Information Systems Research 2 (1991) 173-191.
29. G.C. Moore, I. Benbasat, Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Information Systems Research 2 (1991) 192-222.
30. E. Mumford, D. Henshall, A Participative Approach to Computer Systems Design, Associated Business Press, London, 1979.
31. J. Neter, W. Wasserman, M.H. Kutner, Applied Linear Statistical Models, Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1985.
32. S. Nilakanta, R.W. Scamell, The effects of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation on a data base development environment, Management Science 36 (1990) 24-40.
33. J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.
34. H. Raiffa, Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1970.
35. S.S. Roach, Technology imperatives, Unpublished speech on the restructuring imperative, Morgan Stanley & Co., 1992.
36. E.M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York, 1983.
37. V. Saga, R.W. Zmud, The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion, in: L. Levine (Ed.), Diffusion, Transfer, and Implementation of Information Technology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994.
38. S. Taylor, P. Todd, Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models, Information Systems Research 6 (1995) 144-176.
39. L.G. Tornatzky, K.J. Klein, Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-29 (1982) 28-45.
40. J.L. Wynekoop, J.A. Senn, S.A. Conger, The implementation of CASE tools: an innovation diffusion approach, in: K.E. Kendall et al. (Eds.). The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies on Information Systems Development, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992.
41. G. Zaltman, R. Duncan, J. Holbek, Innovations and Organizations, Wiley, New York, 1973.
42. R.W. Zmud, The effectiveness of external information channels in facilitating innovation within software development groups, MIS Quarterly 7 (1983) 43-58.