Application of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model in predicting pharmacists' intention to use personal digital assistants

Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 792-796

  Dasgupta, Anandaroop ^a   Sansgiry, Sujit S ^b   Sherer, Jeff T ^b   Wallace, David ^b   Sikri, Samir ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^c MarketRx   (India)

Author keywords

Intention to use; Perceptions; Personal digital assistants

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; MIDDLE AGED; PHARMACIST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHARMACISTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 75349091086     PISSN: 15443191     EISSN: 15443450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08136     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Liang H, Felkey BG. Implementing PDA initiatives in health system pharmacies. Hosp Pharm. 2002;37:1348-50.
2. Grasso BC, Genest R. Use of personal digital assistants in reducing medication error rates. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:883-4,886.
3. Morris CG, Church L, Vincent C, Rao A. PDA usage and training: targeting curriculum for residents and faculty. Fam Med. 2007;39:419-24.
4. Barrett JR, Strayer SM, Schubart JR. Information needs of residents during inpatient and outpatient rotations identifying effective personal digital assistants applications. AMIA Annual Symp Proc. 2003:784.
5. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46:186-204.
6. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3):319-40.
7. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceived characteristics of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res. 1991;2:192-222.
8. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
9. Agarwal R, Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decis Sci. 1997;28:557-582.
10. Chismar WC, Patton S. Test of the technology acceptance model for the Internet in pediatrics. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:155-9.
11. Carroll AE, Christakis DA. Physician use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants. Pediatrics. 2004;113:238-42.
12. Agarwal R, Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decis Sci. 1997;28:557-82.
13. Hu PJ, Chau PYK, Liusheng OL, Tam KY. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J Manag Inf Syst. 1999;16:91-112.
14. Siracuse MV, Sowell J. Doctor of pharmacy students' use of personal digital assistants. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72:7.