What’s in it for Me? An Examination of Accounting Students’ Likelihood to Report Faculty Misconduct

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 645-667

  Jones, Joanne C ^a   Spraakman, Gary ^a   Sánchez Rodríguez, Cristóbal ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anger; Faculty misconduct; Inappropriate grading and testing policies; Perceptions of unfairness; Self interest; Student whistleblowing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957945528     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-2015-5     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Allmon, D., Page, D., & Roberts, R. (2000). Determinants of perceptions of cheating: Ethical orientation, personality and demographics. Journal of Business Ethics,23, 411–424.
2. Anderson, M. S. (1999). Uncovering the covert: Research on academic misconduct. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Perspectives on scholarly misconduct in the sciences (pp. 283–314). Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
3. Anderson, M. S., Louis, K. S., & Earle, J. (1994). Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education,65, 331–350.
4. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies,2, 285–324.
5. Barnett, T. (1992). A preliminary investigation of the relationship between selected organizational characteristics and external whistleblowing by employees. Journal of Business Ethics,11(12), 949–959.
6. Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1994). Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business. Journal of Business Ethics,13, 469–480.
7. Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1996). Religiosity ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer’s wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics,15, 1161–1174.
8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51, 1173–1182.
9. Bayer, A. E. (2000). Academic faculty deviance. In C. D. Bryant (Ed.), Encyclopedia of criminology and deviant behavior (pp. 1–3). London: Taylor and Francis.
10. Bernardi, R., Banzhoff, C., Martino, A., & Savasta, A. (2011). Cheating and whistleblowing in the classroom. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting,15, 165–191.
11. Blenkinsopp, J., & Edwards, M. (2008). Chapter 8: On not blowing the whistle: Quiesecent silence as an emotion episode. In W. J. Zerbe, C. E. J. Härtel, & N. M. Ashkanasy (Eds.), Emotions, ethics and decision-making (research on emotion in organizations, volume 4) (pp. 181–206). London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
12. Bloodgood, J., Turnley, W., & Mudrack, P. (2008). The influence of ethics instruction, religiosity, and intelligence on cheating behavior. Journal of Business Ethics,82, 557–571.
13. Braxton, J. (2010). The criticality of norms to the functional imperatives of the social action system of college and university work. Journal of Higher Education,81(3), 416–429.
14. Braxton, J. M., & Bayer, A. E. (Eds.). (2004). Faculty and student classroom improprieties. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
15. Braxton, J., Bayer, A., & Noseworthy, J. (2002). Students as tenuous agents of social control of professional misconduct. Peabody Journal of Education,77(3), 101–124.
16. Braxton, J., Proper, E., & Bayer, A. (2011). Professors behaving badly: Faculty misconduct in graduate education. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
17. Bray, N. J., & Del Favero, M. (2004). Sociological explanations for faculty and student classroom incivilities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning,99, 9–19.
18. Brennan, N., & Kelly, J. (2007). A study of whistleblowing among trainee auditors. The British Accounting Review,39, 61–87.
19. Brief, A. P., & Motowildo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviours. Academy of Management Review,11(4), 710–725.
20. Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2006). Managing academic dishonesty in Australian universities: Implications for teaching, learning and scholarship. Accounting, Accountability and Performance,2(1), 32–63.
21. Bruhn, J. G., Zajac, G., Al-Kazemi, A. A., & Prescott, L. D. (2002). Moral positions and academic conduct: Parameters of tolerance for ethics failure. Journal of Higher Education,73(4), 461–493.
22. Burton, B. K., & Near, J. P. (1995). Estimating the incidence of wrongdoing and whistle-blowing: Results of a study using randomized response technique. Journal of Business Ethics,14, 17–30.
23. Cahn, S. M. (1986). Saints and scamps: Ethics in academia. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
24. Chapell, M., Casey, D., De La Cruz, C., Ferrell, J., Forman, J., Newsham, M., et al. (2004). Bullying in college by students and teachers. Adolescence,39, 53–64.
25. Chen, G., Gully, S., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods.,4, 62–83.
26. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Chory-Assad, R. (2002). Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Communication Quarterly,50(1), 58–77.
28. Christensen Hughes, J., & McCabe, D. L. (2006). Understanding academic misconduct. Canadian Journal of Higher Education,36(1), 49–63.
29. Cohen, J., Holder-Webb, L., Sharp, D., & Pant, L. (2007). The effects of perceived fairness on opportunistic behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research,24, 1119–1138.
30. Cohen, J., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, D. J. (2001). An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics,30(4), 319–336.
31. Curtis, M. B., & Taylor, E. (2009). Whistleblowing in public accounting: Influence of identity disclosure, situational context, and personal characteristics. Journal of Accounting and the Public Interest,9(1), 191–220.
32. DeCoo, W. (2002). Crisis on campus: Confronting academic misconduct. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Dill, D. (2003). The degradation of the academic ethic: Teaching, research, and self regulation. Plenary Session of the Society for Research in Higher Education Conference (SRHE), December 17, 2003, London, UK.
34. Dozier, J. B., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Academy of Management Review,10, 823–836.
35. Eden, D., & Kinnar, J. (1991). Modeling Galatea: Boosting self-efficacy to increase volunteering. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 770.
36. Edwards, M., Ashkanasy, N., & Gardner, J. (2009). Deciding to speak up or remain silent following observed wrongdoing: The role of discrete emotion and climate of silence. In J. Greenberg & M. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organization (pp. 83–109). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
37. Elliott, T., Marquis, L., & Neal, C. (2012). Business ethics perspectives: Faculty plagiarism and fraud. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1234-S.
38. Firmin, M., Burger, A., & Blosser, M. (2009). Affective responses of students who witness classroom cheating. Educational Research Quarterly,32, 3–15.
39. Flint, N., & Johnson, B. (2011). Towards fairer university assessment. London: Routledge.
40. Flory, S., Phillips, T., Reidenbach, R., & Robin, R. (1992). A multidimensional analysis of selected issues in accounting. The Accounting Review,67(2), 284–302.
41. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research,18, 39–50.
42. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39(1), 175–184.
43. Fritzsche, D. J., & Oz, E. (2007). Personal values’ influence on the ethical dimension of decision making. Journal of Business Ethics,75(4), 335–343.
44. Geisser, S. (1975). The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association,70, 320–328.
45. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review,12(June), 9–22.
46. Grimes, P. W. (2004). Dishonesty in academics and business: A cross-cultural evaluation of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics,49, 273–290.
47. Gundlach, M., Douglas, S., & Martinko, M. (2003). A decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Academy of Management Review,28(1), 107–123.
48. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review,108, 814–834.
49. Haidt, J., Koller, S., & Dias, M. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65, 613–628.
50. Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, G. T. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
51. Henik, E. (2008). Mad as hell or scared stiff? The effects of value conflict and emotions on potential whistleblowers. Journal of Business Ethics,80, 111–119.
52. Hollings, J. (2012). Let the story go: The role of emotion in the decision-making process of reluctant, vulnerable witness or whistleblower. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1361-z.
53. Houston, M. B., & Bettencourt, L. A. (1999). But that’s not fair! An exploratory study of student perceptions of instructor fairness. Journal of Marketing Education,21, 84–96.
54. Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,100, 719–737. doi:10.1037/a0022408.
55. Jenkel, & Haen, (2012). Influences on students’ decisions to report cheating: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Academic Ethics,10, 123–136.
56. Jones, J., & Spraakman, G. (2011). A case of academic misconduct: Does self-interest rule? Accounting Perspectives,10(1), 1–22.
57. Kelley, P., & Chang, P. (2007). A typology of university ethical lapses: Types, levels of seriousness and originating location. Journal of Higher Education,78(4), 402–429.
58. Kelly, P., Agle, B., & DeMott, J. (2005). Mapping our progress: Identifying, categorizing, and comparing universities’ ethics infrastructures. Journal of Academic Ethics,3(2–4), 205–229.
59. King, G. (1999). The implications of an organization’s structure on whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics,20(4), 315–326.
60. Kirsch, I. (1995). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy: A concluding commentary. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 341–345). New York, NY: Plenum.
61. Kisamore, J., Stone, T., & Jawahar, I. (2007). Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics,75, 381–394.
62. Knoll, & Van Dick, (2013). Do I hear the whistle….? A first attempt to measure four forms of employee silence and their correlates. Journal of Business Ethics,113, 349–362.
63. Lawson, R. (2004a). Business students’ willingness to engage in academic dishonesty and whistleblowing. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting,9, 1–19.
64. Lawson, R. (2004b). Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the “Real World”? Journal of Business Ethics,49(2), 189–199.
65. Lerner, J., & Tiedens, L. (2006). Portrait of the anger decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,19, 115–137.
66. Loeb, S. (1990). Whistleblowing and accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education,6(2), 281–294.
67. Lohmo¨ller, J. B. (1989). Latent variables path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.
68. MacFarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2012). Academic integrity: A review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education,1, 1–20.
69. MacGregor, J., & Steubs, M. (2013). The Silent Samaritan syndrome: Why the whistle remains unblown. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1639-9.
70. MacNab, B., & Worthley, R. (2008). Self-efficacy as an intrapersonal predictor for internal whistleblowing: A US and Canada examination. Journal of Business Ethics,79, 407–421.
71. McCabe, D., Butterfield, K., & Trevino, L. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning and Education,5(3), 294–305.
72. McKay, R. B., Kidwell, L., & Kling, J. (2007). Faculty ethics from the perspective of college of business administrators. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues,10(1), 105–124.
73. Medina, B. (2011). To encourage ethical behavior by graduate advisers, 3 scholars call for detailed codes of conduct, The Chronicle of Higher Education (October 7).
74. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277–297.
75. Miceli, M., & Near, J. (1985). Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions. Personnel Psychology,38, 525–544.
76. Miceli, M., & Near, J. (2005). Standing up and standing by: What predicts blowing the whistle on organizational wrongdoing. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management,24, 95–136.
77. Miceli, M., Near, J., & Dworkin, T. (2008). Whistleblowing in organizations. New York: Routledge.
78. Miceli, M., Van Scotter, J. R., Near, J., & Rehg, M. (2001). Responses to perceived organizational wrongdoing: Do perceiver characteristics matter? In J. Darley, D. Messick, & R. Tyler (Eds.), Social influences on ethical behavior in organizations (pp. 119–136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
79. Mintz, s, & Morris, R. (2011). Ethical Obligations and Decision Making in Accounting. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
80. Mowday, R. T. (1991). Equity theory predictions of behaviour in organizations. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behaviour (5th ed., pp. 111–131). New York: McGraw Hill.
81. Murphy, K., & Tyler, T. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology.,38, 652–668.
82. Naidoo, R., & Jamieson, (2005). Empowering participants or corroding learning? Towards a research agenda on the impact of student consumerism in higher education. Journal of Education Policy,20(3), 267–281.
83. Near, J., & Miceli, M. (1985). Organizational dissendence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics,4, 1–16.
84. Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1986). Retaliation against whistleblowers: Predictors and effects. Journal of Applied Psychology,71(1), 137–145.
85. Near, J., & Miceli, M. (2011). Integrating models of whistleblowing and wrongdoing: A proposal for a new research agenda. In J. Jetten & M. Hornsey (Eds.), Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference, and defiance (pp. 302–323). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
86. Patel, C. (2003). Some cross-cultural evidence on whistle-blowing as an internal control mechanism. Journal of International Accounting Research,2, 69–96.
87. Perez-Pena, D. (2012). Harvard students in cheating scandal say collaboration was accepted. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/01/education/students-of-harvard-cheating-scandal-say-group-work-was-accepted.html?_r=0.
88. Pershing, J. (2003). To snitch or not to snitch? Applying the concept of neutralization techniques to the enforcement of occupational misconduct. Sociological Perspectives,46(2), 149–178.
89. Rabl, T., & Kuhlmann, T. M. (2008). Understanding corruption in organizations—development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics,82, 477–495.
90. Rennie, S. C., & Crosby, J. R. (2002). Students’ perceptions of whistle blowing: Implications for selfregulation. A questionnaire and focus group survey. Medical Education,36(2), 173–179.
91. Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger Publishers.
92. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, S. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, Hamburg, http://www.smartpls.de.
93. Robie, C., & Kidwell, R. (2003). The “ethical” professor and the undergraduate student: Current perceptions of moral behavior among business school faculty. Journal of Academic Ethics,1, 153–172.
94. Robinson, S. R., & Curtis, M. (2012). The effects of contextual and wrongdoing attributes on whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics,71, 109–124.
95. Rodriguez, N. (2010). Former University of Louisville dean Robert Felner faces 63 months in prison, restitution. Retrieved Dec 31, 2013 from http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20100108/NEWS01/1080376/Former-University-Louisville-dean-Robert-Felner-faces-63-months-prison-restitution.
96. Rose, M., & Fischer, K. (1998). Do authorship policies impact students’ judgments of perceived wrongdoing? Ethics and Behavior,8(1), 59–79.
97. Rosvosky, M., & Hartley, M. (2002). Evaluation and the academy: Are we doing the right thing? Grade inflation and letters of recommendation. Cambridge: Academy of Arts and Sciences.
98. Rothschild, J., & Meithe, T. (1999). Whistleblower disclosures and management retaliation: The battle to control information about organizational corruption. Work and Occupation,26, 107–128.
99. Schmidt, T., Houston, M., Battencourt, L., & Bughton, P. (2003). The impact of voice and justification on students’ perceptions of professors’ fairness. Journal of Marketing Education.,25(2), 177–186.
100. Schoderbek, P. P., & Deshpande, S. P. (1996). Impression management, overclaiming, and perceived unethical conduct: the role of male and female managers. Journal of Business Ethics,15(4), 409–415.
101. Schweitzer, M., & Gibson, D. (2007). Fairness, feelings, and ethical decision-making: Consequences of violating community standards of fairness. Journal of Business Ethics,77, 287–301.
102. Simon, C., Jim, R., Carr, J., Mccullough, C., Morgan, S., Oleson, T., et al. (2004). Gender, student perceptions, institutional commitments and academic dishonesty: Who reports in academic dishonesty cases? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,29(1), 75–90.
103. Spooner, R. (2012). Curtin’s cash for grades scandal widens. WAtoday. Retrieved May 13, 2013 from http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/curtins-cash-for-grades-scandal-widens-20121207-2b1c7.html.
104. Stevens, R. E., Harris, O. J., & Williamson, S. (1993). A comparison of ethical evaluations of business school faculty and students: A pilot study. Journal of Business Ethics,12(8), 611–619.
105. Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,36, 111–147.
106. Stone, T., Kisamore, J., Kluemper, J., & Jawahar, J. (2012). Whistle-blowing in the classroom? Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice,12(5), 11–26.
107. Styles, A., & French, K. (2010). Curtin lecturer implicated in ‘sex-for-marks’ scandal with students. WA Today.
108. Swazey, J. P., Anderson, M. S., & Lewis, K. S. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist,81, 542–553.
109. Treviño, L. K., & Victor, B. (1992). Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Academy of Management Journal,35(1), 36–64.
110. Treviño, L., & Weaver, G. (2003). Managing Ethics in Business Organizations: Social Scientific Perspectives. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.
111. Turner, S. (1999). Research universities and scientific misconduct: Histories, policies and the future. In J. M. Braxton & A. E. Bayer (Eds.), Perspectives on scholarly misconduct in the sciences (pp. 75–98). Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
112. Twale, D., & De Luca, B. (2008). Faculty incivility: The rise of the academic bully culture and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
113. Vadera, A., Aguilera, R., & Caza, B. (2009). Making sense of whistle-blowing’s antecedents: Learning from research on identity and ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly,19(4), 553–586.
114. Valentine, S., & Kidwell, L. (2008). Business students’ ethical evaluation of faculty misconduct. Quality Assurance in Education,16(3), 287–300.
115. Van Scotter, J., Miceli, M., Near, J., & Rehg, M. (2004). What difference can one person make? Organizational dependence relations as predictors of whistleblowing effectiveness. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Change Management,4, 11–20.
116. Venard, B., & Hanafi, M. (2008). Organizational isomorphism and corruption in financial institutions: Empirical research in emerging countries. Journal of Business Ethics,81, 481–498.
117. Victor, B., Trevino, L., & Shapiro, D. (1993). Peer reporting of unethical behavior: The influence of justice evaluations and social context factors. Journal of Business Ethics,12, 235–263.
118. Wasley, P. (2010). Auburn U. Settles With Professor Who Handed Out Easy Grades to Athletes The Chronicle of Higher Education. 53.49.
119. Wold, H. (1979) Model Construction and Evaluation When Theoretical Knowledge is Scarce: An Example of the Use of Partial Least Squares (Cahiers du De′partement D E′conome′trie, Faculte′ des Sciences E′ conomiques et Sociales, Universite′ de Gene`ve, Gene`ve).
120. Youngblood, S., Trevino, L., & Favia, M. (1992). Reactions to unjust dismissal and third-party dispute resolution: A justice framework. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal,5, 283–307.