The Impact of Voice and Justification on Students’ Perceptions of Professors’ Fairness

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 177-186

  Schmidt, Thomas A ^a   Houston, Mark B ^b   Bettencourt, Lance A ^c   Boughton, Paul D ^d  

^a SIMPSON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ANOVA; experiment; fairness; interactional justice; procedural justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992838822     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: 15526550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475303254024     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2, edited by L. Berkowitz, 267-299. New York: Academic Press.
2. Alexander, S., and M. Ruderman. 1987. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research 1 (March): 117-198.
3. Ambrose, M. L., L. K. Harland, and C. T. Kulik. 1991. Influence of social comparisons of perceptions of organizational fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (April): 239-246.
4. Angelo, T. A. 1994. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Paper presented at the annual teaching/learning conference, ACC, University of Kentucky, 14-15 October, Ashland, KY.
5. Bies, R. J. 1987. The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 9, edited by L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw, 289-319. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
6. Bies, R. J., and D. L. Shapiro. 1988. Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal 31 (September): 676-685.
7. Brockner, J. 2002. Makingsense of procedural fairness: How high proce dural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Academy of Management Review 27 (January): 58-76.
8. Cahn, E. 1949. The sense of injustice. New York: New York University Press.
9. Clayson, D. E., and D. A. Haley. 1990. Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured? Journal of Marketing Education 12 (Fall): 9-17.
10. Clemmer, E. C., and B. Schneider. 1996. Fair service. In Advances in services marketing and management, Vol. 5, edited by T. Swartz, D. E. Bowen, and S. W. Brown, 109-126. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
11. Cropanzano, R., and J. Greenberg. 1997. Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In International review of industrial and organizational psychology, edited by C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson, 317-372. New York: John Wiley.
12. Cropanzano, R., and M. A. Konovsky. 1995. Resolving the justice dilemma by improving the outcomes: The case of employee drug screening. Journal of Business and Psychology 10 (winter): 221-243.
13. Desai, S., E. Damewood, and R. Jones. 2001. Be a good teacher and be seen as a good teacher. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (August): 136-143.
14. Deutsch, M. 1985. Distributive justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Dowell, D. A., and J. A. Neal. 1982. A selective view of the validity of student ratings of teaching. Journal of Higher Education 53 (January-February): 51-62.
16. Feldman, K. A. 1989. The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Research in Higher Education 30 (December): 583-645.
17. Folger, R. 1977. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (February): 108-119.
18. Folger, R., and R. Cropanzano. 1998. Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Folger, R., and J. Greenberg. 1985. Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 3, edited by K. Rowland and G. Ferris, 141-183. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
20. Folger, R. and M. A. Konovsky. 1989. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal 32 (May): 115-130.
21. Greenberg, J. 1986. Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (May): 340-342.
22. Greenberg, J. 1987. A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review 12 (June): 9-22.
23. Greenberg, J. 1990. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management 16 (June): 399-432.
24. Greenberg, J., and R. Folger. 1983. Procedural justice, participation and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Basic group processes, edited by P. B. Paulus, 235-256. New York: Springer-Verlag.
25. Houston, M. B., and L. A. Bettencourt. 1999. But that's not fair! An exploratory study of student perceptions of instructor fairness. Journal of Marketing Education 21 (August): 84-96.
26. Kelley, H. H. 1972. Attribution in social interaction. In Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior, edited by E. E. Jones, E. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, and B. Weiner, 1-26. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
27. Konovsky, M. A. 2000. Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management 26 (3): 489-511.
28. Konovsky, M. A., and R. Cropanzano. 1991. Perceived fairness of employee drugtestingas a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (October): 698-707.
29. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? In Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, edited by K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, and R. H. Willis, 27-55. New York: Plenum.
30. Leventhal, G. S., J. Karuza, and W. R. Fry. 1980. Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In Justice and social interaction, edited by G. Mikula, 167-218. New York: Springer-Verlag.
31. Lind, E. A., and T. R. Tyler. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
32. Lowman, J. 1984. Mastering the techniques of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Marks, R. B. 2000. Determinants of student evaluations of global measures of instructor and course value. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (August): 108-119.
34. Marsh, H. W., and L. A. Roche. 1997. Makingstudents'evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist 52 (November): 1187-1197.
35. Masterson, S. S., K. Lewis, B. M. Goldman, and M. S. Taylor. 2000. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal 43 (August): 738-748.
36. Rodabaugh, R. C., and D. A. Kravitz. 1994. Effects of procedural fairness on student judgments of professors. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 5 (2): 67-84.
37. Schlenker, B. R. 1980. Impression management. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
38. Schminke, M., M. L. Ambrose, and R. S. Cropanzano. 2000. The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2): 294-304.
39. Shapiro, D. L., and B. L. Kirkman. 1999. Employees'reactions to the change to work teams: The influence of “anticipatory” injustice. Journal of Organizational Change Management 12: 51-66.
40. Sheppard, B. H. 1984. Third party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. In Research in organizational behavior, edited by B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, 141-190. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
41. Sheppard, B. H. 1985. Justice is no simple matter: Case for elaboratingout model of procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (October): 953-962.
42. Smart D. T., C. A. Kelley, and J. S. Conant. 1999. Marketingeducation in the year 2000: Changes observed and challenges anticipated. Journal of Marketing Education 21 (December): 206-216.
43. Tax, S. S., S. W. Brown, and M. Chandrashekaran. 1998. Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing 62 (April): 60-76.
44. Thibaut, J. W., and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Tyler, T. R., and A. Caine. 1981. The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 (4): 642-655.
46. Tyler, T. R., and E. A. Lind. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. In Advances in experimental social psychology, edited by M. P. Zanna, 115-191. San Diego: Academic Press.
47. van den Bos, K., R. Vermunt, and H. Wilke. 1997. Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (January): 95-104.
48. Walsh, D. J., and M. J. Maffei. 1994. Never in a class by themselves: An examination of behaviors affecting the student-professor relationship. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 5 (2): 23-50.
49. Wong, P. T. B. and B. Weiner. 1981. When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40 (April): 650-663.