Students as tenuous agents of social control of professorial misconduct

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 101-124

  Braxton, John M ^a   Bayer, Alan E ^b   Noseworthy, James A ^c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c General Board of Higher Education and Ministry   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952789406     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327930PJE7703_6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Becker, H. S. (1968). On labeling outsiders. In E. Rubington & M. S. Weinberg (Eds.), Deviance: The interactionist perspective (pp. 13–17). New York: Macmillan.
2. Ben-Yehuda, N. (1985). Deviance and moral boundaries: Witchcraft, the occult, science fiction, deviant sciences and scientists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 195–203.
4. Braxton, J. M. (1995). Disciplines with an affinity for the improvement of undergraduate education. In N. Hativa & M. Marincovich (Eds.), Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice (pp. 59–64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Braxton, J. M., & Bayer, A. E. (1999). Faculty misconduct in collegiate teaching. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Braxton, J. M., Bayer, A. E., & Noseworthy, J. (2001, April). The effects of teaching norm violations on the welfare of students as clients of college teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Sociological Society, Atlanta, GA.
7. Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variations among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XI, pp. 1–46). New York: Agathon.
8. Braxton, J. M., Olsen, D., & Simmons, A. (1998). Affinity disciplines and the use of principles of good practice for undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 39, 299–318.
9. Braxton, J. M., & Toombs, W. (1982). Faculty uses of doctoral training: Consideration of a technique for the differentiation of scholarly effort from research activity. Research in Higher Education, 16, 265–282.
10. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1999). A classification of institutions of higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11. Chickering, A. (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. DeJong, A. J. (1992). Making sense of church-related higher education. In D. S. Guthrie & R. L. Nofzger, Jr. (Eds.), New Directions for Higher Education: Vol. 79. Agendas for churchrelated colleges and universities (pp. 19–27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology (J. A. Spaulding & G. Simpson, Trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published 1897)
14. Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1912)
15. Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47–53.
16. Feldman, K., & Newcomb, T. (1969). The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Finnegan, D. E. (1993). Segmentation in the academic labor market: Hiring cohorts in comprehensive universities. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 621–656.
18. Goode, W. J. (1957). Community within a community. American Sociological Review, 22, 194–200.
19. Goode, W. J. (1969). The theoretical limits of professionalization. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), The semiprofessions and their organization (pp. 266–313). New York: Free Press.
20. Goode, W. J., & Hatt, P. K. (1952). Methods of social research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC: Project on the Status of Women and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.
22. Heath, D. (1968). Growing up in college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Horne, C. (2001). Sociological perspectives on the emergence of social norms. In M. Hechter & K. D. Opp (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 3–34). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Leslie, L. L. (1972). Are response rates essential to valid surveys? Social Science Research, 1, 323–334.
26. Lodahl, J. B., & Gordon, G. G. (1972). The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review, 37, 57–72.
27. McGee, R. (1971). Academic janus. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
29. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Pattillo, M., & Mackenzie, D. M. (1966). Church-sponsored higher education in the United States. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
32. Platt, G., Parsons, T., & Kirshstein, R. (1978). Undergraduate teaching environments: Normative orientations to teaching among faculty in the higher education system. Sociological Inquiry, 43, 3–21.
33. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
34. Sedlacek, W. E., & Brooks, G. C. (1976). Racism in American education. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
35. Trujillo, C. J. (1986). A comparative examination of classroom interactions between professors and minority and nonminority college students. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 629–642.
36. Wilson, E. K. (1982). Power, pretense, and piggybacking: Some ethical issues in teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 53, 268–281.
37. Zuckerman, H. E. (1977). Deviant behavior and social control in science. In E. Sagarin (Ed.), Deviance and social change (pp. 87–138). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Zuckerman, H. E. (1988). The sociology of science. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 511–574). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.