Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: The mediating role of emotions

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 652-668

  Murphy, Kristina ^a   Tyler, Tom ^b  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46849084551     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.502     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2. Adams, J. S., & Freedman, S. (1976). Equity theory revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster, (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 43-90) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Ambrose, M., & Cropanzano, R. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: An examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 266-275.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Chebat, J. C., & Slusarczyk, W. (2005). How emotions mediate the effect of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations: An empirical study. Journal of Business Research, 58, 664-673.
6. Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 293-299.
7. Dijker, A. (1987). Emotional reactions to ethnic minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 305-325.
8. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
9. Feld, L., & Frey, B. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3, 87-99.
10. Fiske, S., Cuddy, A., & Glick, P. (2001). Emotions up and down: Inter-group emotions result from perceived status and competition. In D. Mackie & E. Smith, (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 247-264). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
11. Gordijn, E., Yzerbyt, V., Wigboldus, D., & Dumont, M. (2006). Emotional reactions to harmful intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 15-30.
12. Greenberg, J. (1990a). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: the hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-568.
13. Greenberg, J. (1990b). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 111-157.
14. Hegtvedt, K. A., & Killian, C. (1999). Fairness and emotions: Reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Social Forces, 78, 269-303.
15. Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
16. Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. London: Taylor & Francis.
17. Krehbiel, P. J., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Procedural justice, outcome favourability and emotion. Social Justice Research, 13, 339-360.
18. Lange, B. (2002). The emotional dimension of legal regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 29, 197-225.
19. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
20. Mackie, D., Devos, T., & Smith, E. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
21. Makkai, T., & Braithwaite, J. (1994). Trust and compliance. Policing and society, 4, 1-12.
22. Maxfield, M. G., & Babbie, E. (2008). Research methods for criminal justice and criminology (5th ed). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
23. Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769-783.
24. Montada, L. (1994). Injustice in harm and loss. Social Justice Research, 7, 5-28.
25. Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313-344.
26. Mowday, R. T. (1991). Equity theory predictions of behaviour in organizations. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter, (Eds.), Motivation and work behaviour (5th ed, pp. 111-131). New York: McGraw Hill.
27. Murphy, K. (2002a). The Australian tax system survey of tax scheme investors. Canberra: The Centre for Tax System Integrity, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University.
28. Murphy, K. (2002b). Procedural justice and the Australian Taxation Office: A study of scheme investors. Centre for tax system integrity working paper series no. 35. Canberra: The Australian National University.
29. Murphy, K. (2003). Procedural justice and tax compliance. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38, 379-408.
30. Murphy, K. (2004a). The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 187-209.
31. Murphy, K. (2004b). The Australian tax system survey of tax scheme investors: A follow-up survey. Canberra: The Centre for Tax System Integrity, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National. University.
32. Murphy, K. (2005). Regulating more effectively: The relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy and tax non-compliance. Journal of Law and Society, 32, 562-589.
33. Murphy, K., & Harris, N. (2007) Shaming, shame and recidivism: A test of reintegrative shaming theory in the white-collar crime context. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 900-917.
34. Murphy-Berman, V., Cross, T., & Fondacaro, M. (1999). Fairness and health care decision making: Testing the group value model of procedural justice. Social Justice Research, 12, 117-129.
35. Smith, E. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In D. Mackie & D. Hamilton, (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297-315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 513-547.
37. Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Measurement and analysis of crime and justice: Criminal justice (Vol. 4). Washington DC: US Department of Justice.
38. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
39. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law? New Haven, CT: Yale University.
40. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage.
41. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
42. van den Bos, K. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 482-498.
43. van den Bos, K., Maas, M., Waldring, I. E., & Semin, G. R. (2003). Toward understanding the psychology of reactions to perceived fairness: The role of affect intensity. Social Justice Research, 16, 151-168.
44. VanYperen, N. W., Hagedoorn, M., Zweers, M., & Postma, S. (2000). Injustice and employees' destructive responses: The mediating role of state negative affect. Social Justice Research, 13, 291-312.
45. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46. Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786-794.
47. Wenzel, M. (2002). Principles of procedural fairness in reminder letters: A field-experiment. Centre for tax system integrity working paper no. 42. Canberra: The Australian National University.
48. Williams, S. (1999). The effects of distributive and procedural justice on performance. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 183-193.