The antagonism of ghrelin alters the appetitive response to learned cues associated with food

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 303, Issue , 2016, Pages 191-200

  Dailey, Megan J ^a   Moran, Timothy H ^b   Holland, Peter C ^c   Johnson, Alexander W ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cue potentiated feeding; Ghrelin; GHSR; Pavlovian instrumental transfer

Indexed keywords

GHRELIN; HISTIDYL DEXTRO TRYPTOPHYLALANYLTRYPTOPHYL DEXTRO PHENYLALANYLLYSINAMIDE; PROTEIN C FOS; SUCROSE; GHRELIN RECEPTOR; GHRP-6, LYS(3)-; OLIGOPEPTIDE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; APPETITE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUE POTENTIATED FEEDING TEST; DIET RESTRICTION; EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIORAL TEST; FOOD INTAKE; MALE; MOTIVATION; NONHUMAN; PAVLOVIAN TO INSTRUMENTAL TRANSFER TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RAT; REWARD; AMYGDALA; ANIMAL; ANTAGONISTS AND INHIBITORS; ASSOCIATION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DRUG EFFECTS; HYPOTHALAMUS; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LONG EVANS RAT; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

AMYGDALA; ANIMALS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; CUES; HYPOTHALAMUS; MALE; OLIGOPEPTIDES; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; RECEPTORS, GHRELIN;

EID: 84957664609     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.01.040     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Danaei G., Finucane M.M., Lu Y., Singh G.M., Cowan M.J., Paciorek C.J., et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2·7 million participants. Lancet 2011, 378:31-40.
2. Ng M., Fleming T., Robinson M., Thomson B., Graetz N., Margono C., et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014, 384:766-781.
3. Berthoud H.R. The neurobiology of food intake in an obesogenic environment. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2012, 71:478-487.
4. Johnson A.W. Eating beyond metabolic need: how environmental cues influence feeding behavior. Trends Neurosci. 2013, 36:101-109. 10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.002.
5. Ferriday D., Brunstrom J.M. How does food-cue exposure lead to larger meal sizes?. Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 100:1325-1332.
6. Birch L.L., McPhee L., Sullivan S., Johnson S. Conditioned meal initiation in young children. Appetite 1989, 13:105-113.
7. Fedoroff I.C., Polivy J., Herman C.P. The effect of pre-exposure to food cues on the eating behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. Appetite 1997, 28:33-47.
8. Oakes M.E., Slotterback C.S. The good, the bad, and the ugly: characteristics used by young, middle-aged, and older men and women, dieters and non-dieters to judge healthfulness of foods. Appetite 2002, 38:91-97.
9. Teff K.L. How neural mediation of anticipatory and compensatory insulin release helps us tolerate food. Physiol. Behav. 2011, 103:44-50.
10. Cornell C.E., Rodin J., Weingarten H. Stimulus-induced eating when satiated. Physiol. Behav. 1989, 45:695-704.
11. Holland P.C., Hatfield T., Gallagher M. Rats with basolateral amygdala lesions show normal increases in conditioned stimulus processing but reduced conditioned potentiation of eating. Behav. Neurosci. 2001, 115:945-950.
12. Weingarten H.P. Conditioned cues elicit feeding in sated rats: a role for learning in meal initiation. Science 1983, 220:431-433.
13. Zamble E. Augmentation of eating following a signal for feeding in rats. Learn. Motiv. 1973, 4:138-147.
14. Ferriday D., Brunstrom J.M. 'I just can't help myself': effects of food-cue exposure in overweight and lean individuals. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 2011, 35:142-149.
15. Vereecken C.A., Maes L. Television viewing and food consumption in Flemish adolescents in Belgium. Soz. Praventiv. Med. 2006, 51:311-317.
16. Sun X., Kroemer N.B., Veldhuizen M.G., Babbs A.E., de Araujo I.E., Gitelman D.R., et al. Basolateral amygdala response to food cues in the absence of hunger is associated with weight gain susceptibility. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35:7964-7976.
17. Holland P.C., Gallagher M. Double dissociation of the effects of lesions of basolateral and central amygdala on conditioned stimulus-potentiated feeding and Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 17:1680-1694.
18. Walker A.K., Ibia I.E., Zigman J.M. Disruption of cue-potentiated feeding in mice with blocked ghrelin signaling. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 108:34-43.
19. Sherwood A., Holland P.C., Adamantidis A., Johnson A.W. Deletion of melanin concentrating hormone receptor-1 disrupts overeating in the presence of food cues. Physiol. Behav. 2015, 152:402-407.
20. Dickinson A., Dearing M. Appetitive-aversive Interactions and Inhibitory Processes 1979, Herlblum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
21. Rescorla R.A., Solomon R.L. Two-process learning theory: relationships between pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychol. Rev. 1967, 74:151-182.
22. Kanoski S.E., Fortin S.M., Ricks K.M., Grill H.J. Ghrelin signaling in the ventral hippocampus stimulates learned and motivational aspects of feeding via PI3K-Akt signaling. Biol. Psychiatry 2012.
23. Olszewski P.K., Shaw T.J., Grace M.K., Hoglund C.E., Fredriksson R., Schioth H.B., et al. Complexity of neural mechanisms underlying overconsumption of sugar in scheduled feeding: involvement of opioids, orexin, oxytocin and NPY. Peptides 2009, 30:226-233.
24. Wren A.M., Small C.J., Abbott C.R., Dhillo W.S., Seal L.J., Cohen M.A., et al. Ghrelin causes hyperphagia and obesity in rats. Diabetes 2001, 50:2540-2547.
25. Davidson T.L., Kanoski S.E., Tracy A.L., Walls E.K., Clegg D., Benoit S.C. The interoceptive cue properties of ghrelin generalize to cues produced by food deprivation. Peptides 2005, 26:1602-1610.
26. Keen-Rhinehart E., Bartness T.J. Peripheral ghrelin injections stimulate food intake, foraging, and food hoarding in Siberian hamsters. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2005, 288:R716-22.
27. St-Onge V., Watts A., Abizaid A. Ghrelin enhances cue-induced bar pressing for high fat food. Horm. Behav. 2015, 78:141-149.
28. Kroemer N.B., Krebs L., Kobiella A., Grimm O., Pilhatsch M., Bidlingmaier M., et al. Fasting levels of ghrelin covary with the brain response to food pictures. Addict. Biol. 2013, 18:855-862.
29. Malik S., McGlone F., Bedrossian D., Dagher A. Ghrelin modulates brain activity in areas that control appetitive behavior. Cell Metab. 2008, 7:400-409.
30. Perello M., Sakata I., Birnbaum S., Chuang J.-C., Osborne-Lawrence S., Rovinsky S.A., et al. Ghrelin increases the rewarding value of high-fat diet in an orexin-dependent manner. Biol. Psychiatry 2010, 67:880-886.
31. Abizaid A., Liu Z.-W., Andrews Z.B., Shanabrough M., Borok E., Elsworth J.D., et al. Ghrelin modulates the activity and synaptic input organization of midbrain dopamine neurons while promoting appetite. J. Clin. Invest. 2006, 116:3229-3239.
32. El-Amamy H., Holland P.C. Dissociable effects of disconnecting amygdala central nucleus from the ventral tegmental area or substantia nigra on learned orienting and incentive motivation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 25:1557-1567.
33. Murschall A. Inactivation of the ventral tegmental area abolished the general excitatory influence of Pavlovian cues on instrumental performance. Learn. Mem. 2006, 13:123-126.
34. Wyvell C.L., Berridge K.C. Intra-accumbens amphetamine increases the conditioned incentive salience of sucrose reward: enhancement of reward wanting without enhanced liking or response reinforcement. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:8122-8130.
35. Petrovich G.D. Amygdalar and Prefrontal pathways to the lateral hypothalamus are activated by a learned cue that stimulates eating. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:8295-8302.
36. Petrovich G.D., Gallagher M. Control of food consumption by learned cues: a forebrain-hypothalamic network. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 91:397-403.
37. Mani B.K., Walker A.K., Soto E.J.L., Raingo J., Lee C.E., Perello M., et al. Neuroanatomical characterization of a growth hormone secretagogue receptor-green fluorescent protein reporter mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. 2014, 522:3644-3666.
38. Johnson A.W., Canter R., Gallagher M., Holland P.C. Assessing the role of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor in motivational learning and food intake. Behav. Neurosci. 2009, 123:1058-1065.
39. Drazen D.L., Vahl T.P., D'Alessio D.A., Seeley R.J., Woods S.C. Effects of a fixed meal pattern on ghrelin secretion: evidence for a learned response independent of nutrient status. Endocrinology 2006, 147:23-30.
40. Corbit L.H., Janak P.H., Balleine B.W. General and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer: the effect of shifts in motivational state and inactivation of the ventral tegmental area. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 26:3141-3149.
41. Balleine B. Instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation depends on incentive learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 1992, 18:236-250.
42. Balleine B.W., Garner C., González F., Dickinson A. Motivational control of heterogeneous instrumental chains. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 1995, 21:203-217.
43. Johnson A.W., Bannerman D., Rawlins N., Sprengel R., Good M.A. Targeted deletion of the GluR-1 AMPA receptor in mice dissociates general and outcome-specific influences of appetitive rewards on learning. Behav. Neurosci. 2007, 121:1192-1202.
44. Hall J., Parkinson J.A., Connor T.M., Dickinson A., Everitt B.J. Involvement of the central nucleus of the amygdala and nucleus accumbens core in mediating Pavlovian influences on instrumental behaviour. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2001, 13:1984-1992.
45. Holland P.C., Hsu M. Role of amygdala central nucleus in the potentiation of consuming and instrumental lever-pressing for sucrose by cues for the presentation or interruption of sucrose delivery in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 2014, 128:71-82.
46. Zigman J.M., Jones J.E., Lee C.E., Saper C.B., Elmquist J.K. Expression of ghrelin receptor mRNA in the rat and the mouse brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 494:528-548.
47. Landgren S., Engel J.A., Hyytiä P., Zetterberg H., Blennow K., Jerlhag E. Expression of the gene encoding the ghrelin receptor in rats selected for differential alcohol preference. Behav. Brain Res. 2011, 221:182-188.
48. Corbit L.H. Double dissociation of basolateral and central amygdala lesions on the general and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:962-970.
49. Holland P.C. Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2004, 30:104-117.
50. Berridge K.C., Valenstein E.S. What psychological process mediates feeding evoked by electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus?. Behav. Neurosci. 1991, 105:3-14.
51. Cowley M.A., Smith R.G., Diano S., Tschöp M., Pronchuk N., Grove K.L., et al. The distribution and mechanism of action of ghrelin in the CNS demonstrates a novel hypothalamic circuit regulating energy homeostasis. Neuron 2003, 37:649-661.
52. Holland P., Petrovich G. A neural systems analysis of the potentiation of feeding by conditioned stimuli. Physiol. Behav. 2005, 86:747-761.
53. Esler W.P., Rudolph J., Claus T.H., Tang W., Barucci N., Brown S.E., et al. Small-molecule ghrelin receptor antagonists improve glucose tolerance, suppress appetite, and promote weight loss. Endocrinology 2007, 148:5175-5185.
54. Patel K., Dixit V.D., Lee J.H., Kim J.W., Schaffer E.M., Nguyen D., et al. The GHS-R blocker D-[Lys3] GHRP-6 serves as CCR5 chemokine receptor antagonist. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2012, 9:51-58.
55. Cole S., Mayer H.S., Petrovich G.D. Orexin/hypocretin-1 receptor antagonism selectively reduces cue-induced feeding in sated rats and recruits medial prefrontalcortex and thalamus. Sci. Rep. 2016, 2015:1-11.
56. Galarce E.M., Crombag H.S., Holland P.C. Reinforcer-specificity of appetitive and consummatory behavior of rats after Pavlovian conditioning with food reinforcers. Phys. Behav. 2007, 91:95-105.
57. Galarce E.M., McDannald M.A., Holland P.C. The basolateral amygdala mediates the effects of cues associated with meal interruption on feeding behavior. Brain Res. 2010, 1350:112-122.
58. Konorski J. Integrative Activity of the Brain 1967, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
59. Overduin J., Figlewicz D.P., Bennett-Jay J., Kittleson S., Cummings D.E. Ghrelin increases the motivation to eat, but does not alter food palatability. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2012, 303(3):R259-R269.
60. Johnson A.W., Sherwood A., Smith D.R., Wosiski-Kuhn M., Gallagher M., Holland P.C. An analysis of licking microstructure in three strains of mice. Appetite 2010, 54:320-330.
61. Berridge K.C., Robinson T.E. Parsing reward. Trends Neurosci. 2003, 26:507-513.
62. Wyvell C.L. Incentive sensitization by previous amphetamine exposure: increased cue-triggered wanting for sucrose reward. J. Neurosci. 2001.
63. Gao Q., Horvath T.L. Neurobiology of feeding and energy expenditure. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30:367-398.
64. Allman M.J., Deleon I.G., Cataldo M.F., Holland P.C., Johnson A.W. Learning processes affecting human decision making: an assessment of reinforcer-selective Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer following reinforcer devaluation. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2010, 36:402-408.
65. Wellman P.J., Davis K.W., Nation J.R. Augmentation of cocaine hyperactivity in rats by systemic ghrelin. Regul. Pept. 2005, 125:151-154.
66. Disse E., Bussier A.-L., Veyrat-Durebex C., Deblon N., Pfluger P.T., Tschop M.H., et al. Peripheral ghrelin enhances sweet taste food consumption and preference, regardless of its caloric content. Physiol. Behav. 2010, 101:277-281.
67. Banks W.A., Tschöp M., Robinson S.M., Heiman M.L. Extent and direction of ghrelin transport across the blood-brain barrier is determined by its unique primary structure. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 302:822-827.
68. Egecioglu E., Jerlhag E., Salomé N., Skibicka K.P., Haage D., Bohlooly-Y M., et al. Ghrelin increases intake of rewarding food in rodents. Addict Biol. 2010, 15:304-311.