Preference Mapping of Soymilk with Different U.S. Consumers

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2016, Pages S463-S476

  Lawrence, S E ^a   Lopetcharat, K ^a   Drake, M A ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptance testing; Cross cultural; Descriptive analysis; Preference mapping; Soymilk

Indexed keywords

FLAVORING AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CAUCASIAN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; SOYBEAN MILK; TASTE; UNITED STATES; VISCOSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; FLAVORING AGENTS; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; SOY MILK; TASTE; UNITED STATES; VISCOSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84956714440     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: 17503841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13182     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson JW, Johnstone BM, Cook-Newell ME. 1995. Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids. N Engl J Med 333:276-82.
2. Banerjee S, Li Y, Wang Z, Sarkar FH. 2008. Multi-targeted therapy of cancer by genistein. Cancer Lett 269:226-42.
3. Carrao-Panizzi MC, Beleia AD, Prudencio-Ferreira SH, Oliveira MCN, Kitamura K. 1999. Effects of isoflavones on beany flavor and astringency of soymilk and cooked whole soybean grains. Pesq Agropec Bras 34(6):1045-52.
4. Cherdchu P, Chambers E, Suwonsichon T. 2013. Sensory lexicon development using trained panelists in Thailand and the U.S.A.: soy sauce. J Sens Stud 28(3):248-55.
5. Civille GV, Lyon BG, editors. 1996. Aroma and flavor lexicon for sensory evaluation terms, definitions, references, and examples. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials. p 158.
6. Chambers E, Jenkins A, Mcguire BH. 2006. Flavor properties of plain soymilk. J Sens Stud 21(2):165-79.
7. Day N'kouka K, Klein BP, Lee S-Y. 2004. Developing a lexicon for descriptive analysis of soymilks. J Food Sci 69(7):259-63.
8. Dharmasena S, Capps Jr, O. 2014. Unraveling demand for dairy-alternative beverages in the United States: the case of soymilk. Agr Res Econ Rev 43(1):140-57.
9. Digre H, Erikson U, Skaret J, Lea P, Gallart-Jornet L, Misimi E. 2011. Biochemical, physical and sensory quality of ice-stored Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) as affected by pre-slaughter stress, percussion stunning and AQUI-S™ anaesthesia. Eur Food Res Technol 233:447-56.
10. Hinze A, Karg C, Van Zyl M, Mohamed N, Steyn NP. 2004. The acceptability of different types of soymilks available in Cape Town in consumers from high and low socio-economic areas. Intl J Cons Stud 28(1):40-8.
11. Hong JH, Yoon EK, Chung SJ, Chung L, Cha SM, O'Mahony M, Vickers Z, Kim KO. 2011. Sensory characteristics and cross-cultural consumer acceptability ofbulgogi(Korean traditional barbecued beef). J Food Sci 76:S306-13.
12. Hwang SH, Hong JH. 2013. Sensory drivers of goso flavor in soymilk: understanding a complex traditional Korean sensory attribute. Food Qual Pref 29:113-25.
13. Keast RSJ, Lau JJ. 2006. Culture-specific variation in the flavor profile of soymilks. J Food Sci 71(8):S567-72.
14. Kim Y-K, Jombart L, Valentin D, Kim K-O. 2013. A cross-cultural study using Napping®: do Korean and French consumers perceive various green tea products differently? Food Res Intl 53:534-42.
15. Liu Z-S, Chang SKC. 2013. Nutritional profile and physicochemical properties of commercial soymilk. J Food Proc Pres 37(5):651-61.
16. Lozano PR, Drake MA, Benitez D, Cadwallader KR. 2007. Instrumental and sensory characterization of heat-induced odorants in aseptically packaged soy milk. J Agric Food Chem 55(8):3018-26.
17. Lydeking-Olsen E, Beck-Jensen J-E, Setchell KDR, Holm-Jensen T. 2004. Soymilk or progesterone for prevention of bone loss: a 2 year randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Nutr 43:246-57.
18. Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT. 2007. Descriptive analysis techniques, chapter 10. Sensory evaluation techniques, 4th ed. In: Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT, editors. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press.
19. Messina M, Hughes C. 2003. Efficacy of soyfoods and soybean isoflavone supplements for alleviating menopausal symptoms is positively related to initial hot flush frequency. J Med Food 6:1-11.
20. Neely EA, Lee Y, Lee S-Y. 2010. Drivers of liking for soy-based Indian-style extruded snack foods determined by U.S. and Indian consumers. J Food Sci 75:S292-9.
21. Nti CA, Larweh PM. 2003. Production and sensory characteristics of flavoured soymilk samples. Intl J Cons Stud 27.3:181-4.
22. Park JH, Kang SN, Shin D, Hur IC, Kim IS, Jin SK. 2013. Antioxidant activities of Achyranthes japonica Nakai extract and its application to the pork sausages. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 26(2):287-94.
23. Park JW. 2005. Codex code for frozen surimi. Surimi and surimi seafood. In: Park JW., editor. Boca Raton, Fla.: Taylor and Francis group. p 869-85.
24. Palacios OM, Badran J, Spence L, Drake MA, Reisner M, Moskowitz HR. 2010. Measuring acceptance of milk and milk substitutes among younger and older children. J Food Sci 75.9:S522-6.
25. Prakash D, Upadhyay G, Singh, BN, Singh HB. 2007. Antioxidant and free radical-scavenging activities of seeds and agri-wastes of some varieties of soybean (Glycine max). Food Chem 104:783-90.
26. Prescott J, Young O, O'Neill L, Yau NJN, Stevens R. 2002. Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and New Zealand. Food Qual Pref 13:489-95.
27. Rawdkuen S, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W, Lanier TC. 2004. Chicken plasma protein: proteinase inhibitory activity and its effect on surimi gel properties. Food Res Intl 37(2):156-65.
28. Russell TA, Drake MA, Gerard PD. 2006. Sensory properties of whey and soy proteins. J Food Sci 71(6):S447-55.
29. Savitry A, Prakash M. 2004. Sing a song of soy. Prepared Foods 4:25-8.
30. Soyfoods Association Of North America. 2015. Sales by product type, 1996-2011. Soyfoods Association of North America, Washington, DC, USA. Available from: http://www.soyfoods.org/wp-content/uploads/SANA-sales-data-1996-2011-for-web.pdf. Accessed March 27, 2015.
31. Suknark K, Mcwatters K, Phillips RD. 1998. Acceptance by American and Asian consumers of extruded fish and peanut snack products. J Food Sci 63:721-5.
32. Suppavorasatit I, Lee SY, Cadwallader KR. 2013. Effect of enzymatic protein deamidation on protein solubility and flavor binding properties of soymilk. J Food Sci 78(1):C1-7.
33. Terhaag MM, Almeida MB, Benassi MT. 2013. Soymilk plain beverages: correlation between acceptability and physical and chemical characteristics. Food Sci Technol 33(2):387-94.
34. Torres-Penaranda AV, Reitmeier CA. 2001. Sensory descriptive analysis of soymilk. J. Food Sci 66(2):352-56.
35. Torres-Penaranda AV, Reitmeier CA, Wilson LA, Fehr WR, Narvel JM. 1998. Sensory characteristics of soymilk and tofu made from lipoxygenase-free and normal soybeans. J Food Sci 63(6):1084-7.
36. Vara-Ubol S, Chambers E, Chambers DH. 2004. Sensory characteristics of chemical compounds potentially associated with beany aroma in foods. J Sens Stud 19:15-26.
37. Villegas B, Carbonell I, Costell E. 2009. Acceptability of milk and soymilk vanilla beverages: demographics consumption frequency and sensory aspects. Food Sci Tech Intl 15(2):203-10.
38. Wansink B. 2003. Overcoming the taste stigma of soy. J Food Sci 68:2604-6.
39. Weidner C, Krempf M, Bard J, Cazaubiel M, Bell D. 2008. Cholesterol-lowering effect of soy drink enriched with plant sterols in a French population with moderate hypercholesterolaemia. Lipid Health Dis 7:35-42.
40. Wong WW, Smith EO, Stuff JE, Hachey DL, Heird WC, Pownell HJ. 1998. Cholesterol-lowering effect of soy protein in normocholesterolaemic and hypercholesterolaemic men. Am J Clin Nutr 68:1385S-9S.
41. Wright L, Nancarrow C, Kwok P. 2001. Food taste preferences and cultural influences on consumption. Br Food J 103:348-57.
42. Yao E, Lim J, Tamaki K, Ishii R, Kim K-O, O'Mahony M. 2003. Structured and unstructured 9-point hedonic scales: a cross cultural study with American, Japanese and Korean consumers. J Sens Stud 18:115-39.
43. Yeh LL, Kim KO, Chompreeda P, Rimkeeree H, Yau NJN, Lundahl DS. 1998. Comparison in use of the 9-point hedonic scale between Americans, Chinese, Koreans, and Thai. Food Qual Pref 9(6):413-9.