Nutritional profile and physicochemical properties of commercial soymilk

Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 651-661

  Liu, Zhi Sheng ^a   Chang, Sam K C ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ATTRIBUTES; CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; NUTRIENT CONTENTS; NUTRITIONAL PROFILES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; TOTAL CARBOHYDRATES; TOTAL SOLID CONTENT;

RETAIL STORES; SALES;

CARBOHYDRATES;

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 84885856931     PISSN: 01458892     EISSN: 17454549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.2012.00696.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ACHOURI, A., IRENE, J. and ZAMANI, Y. 2007. Changes in soymilk quality as a function of composition and storage. J. Food Qual. 30, 731-744.
2. AOAC INTERNATIONAL. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th Ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Gaithersburg, MD.
3. BAI, Y., WILSON, L.A. and GLATZ, B.A. 1998. Quality of commercial shelf-stable soymilk products. J. Food Prot. 9, 1161-1164.
4. BELTSVILLE HUMAN NUTRITION RESEARCH CENTER (BHNRC). 2009. Community nutrition products and services, community nutrition: NMap. http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=10709 (accessed May 2, 2009).
5. BUS, A.E.M. and WORSLEY, A. 2003. Consumers' health perceptions of three types of milk: a survey in Australia. Appetite 40, 93-100.
6. CHANTRAPORNCHAI, W., CLYDESDALE, F.M. and MCCLEMENT, D.J. 1998. Influence of droplet size and concentration on the color of oil-in-water emulsion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 2914-2920.
7. COURREGELONGUE, S., SCHLICH, P. and NOBLE, A.C. 1999. Using repeated ingestion to determine the effect of sweetness, viscosity and oiliness on temporal perception of soymilk astringency. Food Qual. Prefer. 10, 273-279.
8. COX, S.D. and MILLER, J.L. 2002. Interactions of precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) with proteins in the calcium fortification of dairy and non-dairy beverages. 2002 - IFT Annual Meeting, June 15-19, 2006, Anaheim, California.
9. GINN, P.W., HOSKEN, R.W., COLE, S.J. and ASHTON, J.F. 1998. Physicochemical and sensory evaluation of selected Australian UHT processed soy beverages. Food Aust. 50, 347-351.
10. IWUOHA, C.I. and UMUNNAKWE, K.E. 1997. Chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of soymilk as affected by processing method, temperature and duration of storage. Food Chem. 59, 373-379.
11. LIU, Z.S. and CHANG, S.K.C. 2004. Effect of soy milk characteristics and cooking conditions on coagulant requirements for making filled tofu. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 3405-3411.
12. LIU, Z.S. and CHANG, S.K.C. 2006. Selected physicochemical properties of commercial soymilk/beverage. 2006 - IFT Annual Meeting, June 24, 2006-June 28, 2006, Orlando, FL, U.S.A.
13. LIU, Z.S. and CHANG, S.K.C. 2007. Soymilk viscosity as influenced by heating methods and soybean varieties. J. Food Proc. Preserv. 31, 320-333.
14. MITTAL, M., QUADRI, A., KUSHWAH, H.S. and DATTA, I.C. 1976. Comparative chemical analysis of soymilk vs cow's milk. Ind. J. Nutr. Dietet. 13, 185-188.
15. NIELSEN, S.S. 2010. Nutrition labeling. In: Food Analysis, 3rd Ed., (S.S. Nielsen, ed.) pp. 35-52, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.
16. PHILLIPS, L.G., MCGIFF, M.L., BARBANO, D.M. and LAWLESS, H.T. 1995. The influence of fat on the sensory properties, viscosity, and color of low-fat milk. J. Dairy Sci. 78, 1258-1266.
17. REDDY, P.V. and MITAL, B.K. 1992. Physical and chemical characteristics of soy milk. J. Food Sci. Technol. 29, 193-194.
18. SAS INSTITUTE. 2005. SAS/SAT Software, Version 9.1.3 for Windows. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
19. SAXENA, S. and SINGH, G. 1997. Suitability of new soybean cultivars in the production of soy milk. J. Food Sci. Technol. 34, 150-152.
20. SHURTLEFF, W. and AOYAGI, A. 1990. Tofu and Soymilk Production: The Book of Tofu, Vol. II. Soyfoods Center, Lafayette, CA.
21. SOYATECH, INC. & SPINS. 2009. Soyfoods: The U.S. Market 2009.
22. SOYFOODS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA. 1996. Voluntary standards for the composition and labeling of soymilk in the United States.
23. TOBACMAN, J.K. 2001. Review of harmful gastrointestinal effects of carrageenan in animal experiments. Environ. Health Perspect. 109(10), 983-994.
24. UNITED SOYBEAN BOARD. 2009. Consumer attitudes report. http://www.soyfoods.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/ConsumerAttitudes2009.pdf (accessed May 2, 2009).
25. VILLEGAS, B., CARBONELL, I. and COSTELL, E. 2008. Color and viscosity of milk and soybean vanilla beverages. Instrumental and sensory measurements. J. Sci Food Agric. 88, 397-403.
26. WANG, B., XIONG, Y. and WANG, C. 2001. Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of flavored soymilk during refrigeration storage. J. Food Qual. 24, 513-526.