The Role of Oral Participation in Student Engagement

Communication Education

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 83-104

  Frymier, Ann Bainbridge ^a   Houser, Marian L ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Engagement; Learning; Motivation; Oral Participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955653564     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: 14795795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1066019     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. M.Ainley, (1993). Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationships with strategy use and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 395–405. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.395
2. P.A.Andersen,, & L.K.Guerrero, (1989, February). Avoiding communication: Verbal and nonverbal dimensions of defensiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, Spokane, WA.
3. P.G.Barker, (2011). Conceptions of engagement held by high school seniors perceived by their teachers as being quiet: A phenomenographic study (dissertations available from ProQuest. Paper AAI3455413). Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3455413
4. S.Birch,, & G.Ladd, (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children's early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 61–79. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00029-5
5. D.M.Brooks,, & A.E.Woolfolk, (1987). The effects of students’ nonverbal behavior on teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 88(1), 50–63. doi:10.1086/461523
6. T.A.Brown, (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7. D.J.Cegala, (1981). Interaction involvement: A cognitive dimension of communicative competence. Communication Education, 30(2), 109–121. doi:10.1080/03634528109378460
8. A.J.Clark,, & J.Yeager, (1995). WTC and PRCA scores a indices of classroom communication participation in a high school setting. The Florida Communication Journal, 23, 16–23.
9. D.Dancer,, & P.Kamvounias, (2005). Student involvement in assessment: A project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 445–454. doi:10.1080/02602930500099235
10. P.Ekman,, & M.O'Sullivan, (2006). From flawed self-assessment to blatant whoppers: The utility of voluntary and involuntary behavior in detecting deception. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24, 673–686. doi:10.1002/bsl.729
11. P.A.Fassinger, (1995). Understanding classroom interaction: Students’ and professors’ contributions to students’ silence. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(1), 82–96. doi:10.2307/2943952
12. N.R.Faylor,, S.A.Beebe,, M.L.Houser,, & T.P.Mottet, (2008). Perceived differences in instructional communication behaviors between effective and ineffective corporate trainers. Human Communication, 11, 145–156.
13. A.Field, (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
14. W.S.Z.Ford,, A.D.Wolvin, & S.Chung, (2000). Students’ self-perceived listening competencies in the basic speech communication course. International Journal of Listening, 14(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/10904018.2000.10499032
15. J.A.Fredricks,, P.C.Blumenfeld,, & A.H.Paris, (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
16. J.Fredricks,, W.McColskey,, J.Meli,, J.Mordica,, B.Montrosse,, & K.Mooney, (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011-No. 098). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
17. B.N.Frisby,, & S.A.Myers, (2008). The relationships among perceived instructor rapport, student participation, and student learning outcomes. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 33, 27–34.
18. L.M.Fritschner, (2000). Inside the undergraduate college classroom: Faculty and students differ on the meaning of student participation. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 342–362. doi:10.2307/2649294
19. A.B.Frymier, (2005). Students’ classroom communication effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 53, 197–212. doi:10.1080/01463370500089896
20. A.B.Frymier,, & M.L.Houser, (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/10510979909388466
21. A.B.Frymier,, G.M.Shulman,, & M.L.Houser, (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45, 181–199. doi:10.1080/03634529609379048
22. J.P.Guilford, (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23. L.Harris, (2011). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of student engagement: Engagement in learning or in schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 376–386. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.006
24. S.R.Hart,, K.Stewart,, & S.R.Jimerson, (2011). The student engagement in schools questionnaire (SESQ) and the teacher engagement report form-new (TERF-N): Examining the preliminary evidence. Contemporary School Psychology, 15, 67–79.
25. H.T.Hurt,, M.D.Scott,, & J.C.McCroskey, (1978). Communication in the classroom. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. J.F.Jones, (1999). From silence to talk: Cross-cultural ideas on students’ participation in academic group discussion. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 243–259. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00059-8
27. R.C.Jones, (2008). The “why” of class participation: A question worth asking. College Teaching, 56(1), 59–63. doi:10.3200/CTCH.56.1.59-64
28. G.Lee, (2009). Speaking up: Six Korean students’ oral participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 142–156. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2009.01.007
29. G.A.D.Liem,, & A.J.Martin, (2012). The motivation and engagement scale: Theoretical framework, psychometric properties, and applied yields. Australian Psychologist, 47(1), 3–13. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00049.x
30. A.J.Martin, (2007a). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413–440. doi:10.1348/000709906X118036
31. A.J.Martin, (2007b). The motivation and engagement scale. Sydney: Lifelong Achievement Group. Retrieved from www.lifelongachievement.com
32. A.J.Martin, (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic life span. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 794–824. doi:10.1177/0013164409332214
33. A.J.Martin, (2010). Building classroom success: Eliminating academic fear and failure. London: Continuum.
34. A.J.Martin,, & K.Hau, (2010). Achievement motivation among Chinese and Australian school students: Assessing differences of kind and differences of degree. International Journal of Testing, 10, 274–294. doi:10.1080/15305058.2010.482220
35. J.P.Mazer, (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 99–125. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
36. J.C.McCroskey, (1982). Oral communication apprehension: A reconceptualization. In M.Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 135–170). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37. K.Meyer, (2007, November). Student engagement in the classroom: An examination of student silence and participation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
38. K.Meyer, (2008, November). Student classroom engagement: A multiple linear regression analysis of the variables predicting student silence and participation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
39. R.B.Miller,, B.A.Greene,, G.P.Montalvo,, B.Ravindran,, & J.D.Nichols, (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388–422. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0028
40. T.P.Mottet, (2000). Interactive television instructors’ perceptions of students’ nonverbal responsiveness and their influence on distance teaching. Communication Education, 49, 146–164. doi:10.1080/03634520009379202
41. T.P.Mottet,, & S.A.Beebe, (2006). The relationships between student responsive behaviors, student socio-communicative style, and instructors’ subjective and objective assessments of student work. Communication Education, 55, 295–312. doi:10.1080/03634520600748581
42. National Research Council & Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43. National Survey of Student Engagement. (2000). The NSSE report: National benchmarks of effective educational practice. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning.
44. K.Petress, (2006). An operational definition of class participation. College Student Journal, 40, 821–823.
45. M.M.Reda, (2010, September 5). What's the problem with quiet students? Anyone? Anyone? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://chronicle.com/article/Whats-the-Problem-With-Quiet/124258/
46. R.Reinsch,., & J.R.Wambsganss, (1994). Class participation: How it affects results on examinations. Journal of Education for Business, 70(1), 33–37. doi:10.1080/08832323.1994.10117721
47. L.Remedios,, D.Clarke,, & L.Hawthorne, (2008). The silent participant in small group collaborative learning contexts. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 201–216. doi:10.1177/1469787408095846
48. V.P.Richmond, (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181–195. doi:10.1080/03634529009378801
49. V.P.Richmond, J.S.Gorham,, & J.C.McCroskey, (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M.L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 10, pp. 574–590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. V.P.Richmond,, D.R.Lane,, & J.C.McCroskey, (2006). Teacher immediacy and the teacher–student relationship. In T.P.Mottet, V.P.Richmond, & J.C.McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical & relational perspective (pp. 167–193). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
51. P.Riley, (2011). Attachment theory and the teacher–student relationship: A practical guide for teachers, teacher educators, and school leaders. New York, NY: Routledge.
52. K.A.Rocca, (2009). Participation in the college classroom: The impact of instructor immediacy and verbal aggression. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 43, 22–33.
53. K.A.Rocca, (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59, 185–213. doi:10.1080/03634520903505936
54. U.D.Sharkey,, S.You,, & K.Schnoebelen, (2008). Relations among school assets, individual resilience, and student engagement for youth grouped by level of family functioning. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 402–418. doi:10.1002/pits.20305
55. E.A.Skinner,, & M.J.Belmont, (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
56. D.G.Smith, (1977). College classroom interactions and critical thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 180–190. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.69.2.180
57. J.J.Velez,, & J.Cano, (2008). The relationship between teacher immediacy and student motivation. Journal of Agricultural Education, 49(3), 76–86. doi:10.5032/jae.2008.03076
58. R.R.Weaver,, & J.Qi, (2005). Classroom organization and participation: College students’ perceptions. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 570–601. doi:10.1353/jhe.2005.0038
59. G.G.Wehlage,, R.A.Rutter,, G.A.Smith,, N.L.Lesko,, & R.R.Fernandez, (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. Philadelphia, PA: Farmer Press.
60. P.L.Witt,, L.R.Wheeless,, & M.Allen, (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184–207. doi:10.1080/036452042000228054