The relationships between student responsive behaviors, student socio-communicative style, and instructors' subjective and objective assessments of student work

Communication Education

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 295-312

  Mottet, Timothy P ^a   Beebe, Steven A ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interpersonal Needs Theory; Objective and Subjective Assessment Practices; Public Speaking Assessment; Student Responsiveness and Assertiveness; Student Socio Communicative Style

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745530626     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: 14795795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520600748581     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Babad, E. Y. (1985). Some correlates of teachers' expectancy bias. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 175-183.
2. Baringer, D., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). Immediacy in the classroom: Student immediacy. Communication Education, 49, 178-186.
3. Beard, R. (1976). Teaching and learning in higher education (3rd ed.). New York: Penguin.
4. Bernard, M. E. (1979). Does sex behavior influence the way teachers evaluate students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 553-562.
5. Bock, D. G., & Bock, E. H. (1977). The effects of sex on experimenter, expectancy inductions, and sex of the rater, on leniency, halo, and trait errors in speech rating behavior. Communication Education, 26, 298-306.
6. Bohn, C. A., & Bohn, E. (1985). Reliability of raters: The effects of rating errors on the speech rating process. Communication Education, 34, 343-351.
7. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
8. Brownell, J. (1996). Listening: Attitudes, principles, and skills. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9. Chory-Assad, R. M. (2002). Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Communication Education, 53, 253-273.
10. Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004). Antisocial classroom communication: Instructor influence and interactional justice as predictors of student aggression. Communication Quarterly, 52, 98-114.
11. Cissna, D., & Seiberg, E. (1995). Patterns of interactional confirmation and disconfirmation. In M. V. Redmond (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Readings in theory and research (pp. 230-239). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
12. Civikly, J. M. (1982). Self-concept, significant others, and classroom communication. In L. L. Barker (Ed.), Communication in the classroom (pp. 146-168). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Cockburn, A. D. (2000). Elementary teachers' needs: Issues of retention and recruitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 223-238.
14. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
15. Comstock, J. (1999, November). Mutual influence in teacher-student relationships: Applying IAT to access teacher adaptation to student classroom involvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
16. Cox, R. (1967). Examinations and higher education. Universities Quarterly, 21, 292-340.
17. Education Science Reform Act of 2002. (2002). Retrieved July 5, 2005, from the Institute of Education Science http://www.edu.gov/about/offices/list/ ies/index.html
18. Elbow, P. (1993). Ranking, evaluating, and liking: Sorting out three forms of judgment. College English, 55, 187-206.
19. Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26, 264-291.
20. Frymier, A. B. (1994). The use of affinity-seeking in producing liking and learning in the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 87-105.
21. Frymier, A. B. (2005a). Students' classroom communication effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 53, 197-212.
22. Frymier, A. B. (2005b, April). Teachers' rhetorical and relational goals in teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
23. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer.
24. Gottman, J., & DeClaire, J. (2001). The relationship cure: A five-step guide for building better connections with family, friends, and lovers. New York: Crown.
25. Goulden, N. R. (1990). A program of rater training for evaluating public speeches combining accuracy and error approaches. Basic Communication Course Annual, 2, 143-165.
26. Goulden, N. R. (1992). Theory and vocabulary for communication assessments. Communication Education, 41, 258-269.
27. Harper, B. H., & Hughey, J. D. (1986). Effects of communication responsiveness upon instructor judgment grading and student cognitive learning. Communication Education, 35, 147-156.
28. Hu, S. (Ed.). (2005). Beyond grade inflation: Grading problems in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, Vol. 30, No. 6. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Knapp, M., Se Vangelisti, A. (2000). Interpersonal communication and relationships (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30. Laing, R. D. (1961). The self and others; further studies in insanity and madness. London: Tavistock.
31. Legg, S. M. (1998). Reliability and validity. In W. Wolcott 8c S. M. Legg (Eds.), An overview of writing assessment: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 124-142). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
32. Maki, P. L. (2004). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution. Stylus, VA: Stylus.
33. Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., & Chesebro, J. L. (1997). Students' perceptions of instructors' socio-communicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation. Communication Research Reports, 14, 431-441.
34. McCroskey, J. C. (1982). Communication competence and performance: A research and pedagogical perspective. Communication Education, 31, 1-7.
35. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1996). Fundamentals of human communication: An interpersonal perspective. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
36. Merrill, D. W., & Reid, R. H. (1981). Personal styles and effective performance: Make your work style work for you. Radnor, PA: Chilton Book.
37. Miller, D. T., & Turnbull, W. (1986). Expectancies and interpersonal processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 233-256.
38. Morreale, S. P. (1994). Public speaking. In W. G. Christ (Ed.), Assessing communication education: A handbook for media, speech and theatre educators (pp. 219-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Mottet, T. P. (2000). Interactive television instructors' perceptions of students' nonverbal responsiveness and their influence on distance teaching. Communication Education, 49, 146-164.
40. Mottet, T. P., Beebe, S. A., & Fleuriet, C. (2006). Students' influence messages. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 143-166). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
41. Mottet, T. P., Beebe, S. A., Raffeld, P. C., & Medlock, A. L. (2004). The effects of student verbal and nonverbal responsiveness on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Communication Education, 53, 150-163.
42. Mottet, T. P., Beebe, S. A., Raffeld, P. C., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004). The effects of student verbal and nonverbal responsiveness on teachers' liking of students and willingness to comply with student requests. Communication Quarterly, 52, 27-38.
43. Mottet, T. P., Beebe, S. A., Raffeld, P. C., & Paulsel, M. L. (2005). The effects of student responsiveness on teachers granting power to students and essay evaluation. Communication Quarterly, 53, 421-436.
44. Myers, S. A. (1998). Instructor socio-communicative style, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom. Communication Research Reports, 15, 141-151.
45. Natriello, G., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1983). Bringing behavior back in: The effects of student characteristics and behavior on the classroom behavior of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 29-43.
46. Nelson, J. A., & Hutcherson, D. E. (1970). A pilot study of the relationships of student teaching grades to FIRO compatibility among the student teacher, supervising teacher, and university supervisor. Journal of Teacher Education, 21, 44-46.
47. Norton, R. (1983). Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48. Richmond, V. P., Lane, D. R., & McCroskey, J. C. (2006). Teacher immediacy and the teacher-student relationship. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 167-193). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
49. Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). Communication: Apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
50. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
51. Rubin, R. B. (1999). Evaluating the product. In A. L. Vangelisti, J. A. Daly, & G. W. Friedrich (Eds.), Teaching communication: Theory, research, and methods (2nd ed.) (pp. 425-444). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Scannell, D. P., & Tracy, D. B. (1975). Testing and measurement in the classroom. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
53. Schutz, W. (1958). FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York: Rinehart.
54. Schutz, W. (1966). The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
55. Seiberg, E., & Larson, C. (1971, May). Dimensions of interpersonal response. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.
56. Speck, B. W. (2000). Grading students' classroom writing: Issues and strategies: ASHE Higher Education Research Report, Vol. 27, No. 3. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education & Human Development.
57. Spitzberg, B. H. (1983). Communication competence as knowledge, skill, and impression. Communication Education, 32, 323-329.
58. Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2004). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
59. Streich, D. J., & Hellweg, S. A. (1988, February). Job satisfaction as a function of interpersonal needs: An analysis of superior-subordinate relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
60. Turman, P. D., & Barton, M. H. (2004). Bias in the evaluation process: Influences of speaker order, speaker quality, and gender of rater error in the performance based course. Basic Communication Course Annual, 16, 1-35.
61. Wade, B. (1978). Responses to written work. Educational Review, 30, 149-158.
62. Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (1998). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
63. Wanzer, M. B., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). Teacher socio-communicative style as a correlate of student affect toward teacher and course material. Communication Education, 47, 43-52.
64. Ward, A. W., Stoker, H. W., & Murray-Ward, M. (1996). Educational measurement: Origins, theories, and explications: Vol. 1. Basic concepts and theories. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
65. Wiemann, J. M., & Backlund, P. (1980). Current theory and research in communicative competence. Review of Educational Research, 50, 185-199.
66. Wolvin, A., & Coakley, C. G. (1996). Listening (5th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
67. Wooten, A. G., & McCroskey, J. C. (1996). Student trust of teacher as a function of socio-communicative style of teacher and socio-communicative orientation of student. Communication Research Reports, 13, 94-100.