Epidural Electrical Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 107-119

  Levy, Robert M ^a   Harvey, Richard L ^b,c   Kissela, Brett M ^d   Winstein, Carolee J ^e   Lutsep, Helmi L ^f   Parrish, Todd B ^b   Cramer, Steven C ^g   Venkatesan, Lalit ^h  

^a Marcus Neuroscience Institute   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h St Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division   (United States)

Author keywords

cortical stimulation; hemiparesis; rehabilitation; stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOTOR ABILITY TEST; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIZZINESS; ELECTRICAL EPIDURAL MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAND FUNCTION; HEADACHE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR; INFECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; NECK PAIN; NEUROREHABILITATION; PAIN; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE GENERATOR; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STROKE PATIENT; SWELLING; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VERTIGO; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROTHERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STROKE REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AGED; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE REHABILITATION;

EID: 84955619933     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968315575613     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer RL, Ward E,. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987; 50: 714-719.
2. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ,. Probability of regaining dexterity in flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34: 2181-2186.
3. Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley L, Hewer RL,. Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989; 52: 1267-1272.
4. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail SM,. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983; 46: 521-524.
5. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS,. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75: 394-398.
6. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al.EXCITE Investigators. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006; 296: 2095-2104.
7. Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ,. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 1999; 21: 357-364.
8. Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD,. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke. 1999; 30: 573-579.
9. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997; 28: 2518-2527.
10. Johannson BB,. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. The Willis Lecture. Stroke. 2000; 31: 223-230.
11. Kato H, Izumiyama M, Koizumi H, Takahashi A, Itoyama Y,. Near-infrared spectroscopic topography as a tool to monitor motor reorganization after hemiparetic stroke: a comparison with functional MRI. Stroke. 2002; 33: 2032-2036.
12. Nudo RJ, Friel KM,. Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1999; 155: 713-717.
13. Nudo RJ,. Plasticity. NeuroRX. 2006; 3: 420-427.
14. Adkins-Muir DL, Jones TA,. Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurol Res. 2003; 25: 780-788.
15. Kleim JA, Bruneau R, Vandenberg P, MacDonald R, Mulrooney R, Pocock D,. Motor cortex stimulation enhances motor recovery and reduces peri-infarct dysfunction following ischemic insult. Neurol Res. 2003; 25: 789-793.
16. Plautz EJ, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Post-infarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery using concurrent cortical stimulation and rehabilitative training: a feasibility study in primates. Neurol Res. 2003; 25: 801-810.
17. Ameli M, Grefkes C, Kemper F, et al. Differential effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex in cortical and subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. Ann Neurol. 2009; 66: 298-309.
18. Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N, Rothwell JC,. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005; 65: 466-468.
19. Kim YH, You SH, Ko MH, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2006; 37: 1471-1476. Erratum in Stroke. 2006;37:2861.
20. Yozbatiran N, Alonso-Alonso M, See J,. Safety and behavioral effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke. Stroke. 2009; 40: 309-312.
21. Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonati SP, Nitche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F,. Repeated sessions of non-invasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007; 25: 123-129.
22. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005; 128: 490-499.
23. Harvey RL, Nudo RJ,. Cortical brain stimulation: a potential therapeutic agent for upper limb motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007; 14 (6): 54-67.
24. Opitz A, Zafar N, Bockermann V, Rohde V, Paulus W,. Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions. Neuroimage Clin. 2014; 4: 500-507.
25. Deng ZD, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV,. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs. Brain Stimul. 2013; 6: 1-13.
26. Wongsarnpigoon A, Grill WM,. Computer-based model of epidural motor cortex stimulation: effects of electrode position and geometry on activation of cortical neurons. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012; 123: 160-172.
27. Brown JA, Lutsep HL, Weinand M, Cramer SC,. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery. 2006; 58: 464-473.
28. Levy R, Ruland S, Weinand M, Lowry D, Dafer R, Bakay R,. Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiparetic stroke: a multicenter feasibility study of safety and efficacy. J Neurosurg. 2008; 108: 707-714.
29. Harvey RL, Winstein CJ,. Design for the Everest randomized trial of cortical stimulation and rehabilitation for arm function following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 32-44.
30. Berglund K, Fugl-Meyer AR,. Upper extremity function in hemiplegia: a cross-validation study of two assessment methods. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986; 18: 155-157.
31. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG,. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983; 63: 1606-1610.
32. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglin S,. The post stroke hemiplegic patient I: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7: 13-31.
33. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G,. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, action research arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005; 19: 404-411.
34. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Gowland C,. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 1993; 73: 447-454.
35. Gladstone DJ, Daniells CJ, Black SE,. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of tis measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002; 16: 232-240.
36. Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghianian L, Cramer S,. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22: 78-90.
37. Bravi L, Stoykov ME,. New directions in occupational therapy: implementation of the task-oriented approach in conjunction with cortical stimulation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007; 14 (6): 68-73.
38. Cup EH, Scholte op, Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, van Kuyk-Minis MA,. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003; 17: 402-409.
39. Eyssen IC, Beelen A, Dedding C, Cardol M, Dekker J,. The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Clin Rehabil. 2005; 19: 888-894.
40. Chae J, Labatia I, Yang G,. Upper limb motor function in hemiparesis: concurrent validity of the arm motor ability test. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 82: 1-8.
41. Nouri S, Cramer SC,. Anatomy and physiology predict response to motor cortex stimulation after stroke. Neurology. 2011; 77: 1076-1083.
42. Cameron T,. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100 (3 suppl spine): 254-267.
43. Zrinzo L, Foltynie T, Limousin P, Hariz MI,. Reducing hemorrhagic complications in functional neurosurgery: a large case series and systematic literature review. J Neurosurg. 2012; 116: 84-94.
44. Coley E, Farhadi R, Lewis S, Whittle IR,. The incidence of seizures following deep brain stimulating electrode implantation for movement disorders, pain and psychiatric conditions. Br J Neurosurg. 2009; 23: 179-183.
45. Falowski S, Wang D, Sabesan A, Sharan A,. Occipital nerve stimulator systems: review of complications and surgical techniques. Neuromodulation. 2010; 13: 121-125.
46. Page SJ, Gauthier LV, White S,. Size doesn't matter: cortical stroke lesion volume is not associated with upper extremity motor impairment and function in mild, chronic hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94: 817-821.
47. Lindenberg R, Zhu LL, Rüber T, Schlaug G,. Predicting functional motor potential in chronic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012; 33: 1040-1051.
48. Jang SH, Kim K, Kim SH, Son SM, Jang WH, Kwon HG,. The relation between motor function of stroke patients and diffusion tensor imaging findings for the corticospinal tract. Neurosci Lett. 2014; 572: 1-6.
49. Kwon YH, Son SM, Lee J, Bai DS, Jang SH,. Combined study of transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor tractography for prediction of motor outcome in patients with corona radiata infarct. J Rehabil Med. 2011; 43 (5), 430-434.
50. Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR,. Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials. Int J Stroke. 2009; 4: 2000-2005.
51. Harvey RL, Roth HR, Tappan RS, Kermen R, Laine J, Stinear J, Rogers LM,. The Contrastim Stroke Study: improving hand and arm function after stroke with combined non-invasive brain stimulation and task-oriented therapy-a pilot study. Stroke. 2014; 45 (suppl 1): A152.
52. Morimoto T, Yasuhara T, Kameda M, et al. Striatal stimulation nurtures endogenous neurogenesis and angiogenesis in chronic phase ischemic stroke rats. Cell Transplant. 2011; 20: 1049-1064.
53. Adkins DL, Hsu JE, Jones TA,. Motor cortical stimulation promotes synaptic plasticity and behavioral improvements following sensorimotor cortex lesions. Exp Neurol. 2008; 212: 14-28.
54. Levin M, Kleim JA, Wolf SL,. Point of view: enhancing interdisciplinary perspectives: what do motor recovery and compensation mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 313-319.
55. Kitago T, Liang J, Huang VS, et al. Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy: recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013; 27: 99-109.