Reliability and validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure in stroke patients

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 402-409

  Cup, E H C ^a   Scholte op Reimer, W J M ^b   Thijssen, M C E ^a   van Kuyk Minis, M A H ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORK CAPACITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CANADA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0038779502     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr635oa     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Townsend E ed. Enabling occupation. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE, 1997.
2. Pollock N. Client-centred assessment. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 298-301.
3. Pollock N, Baptiste S, Law M, McColl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H. Occupational performance measures: a review based on the guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990; 57: 77-81.
4. Cardol M, Brandsma JW, Groot de IJM, Bos van den GAM, Haan de RJ, Jong de BA. Handicap questionnaires: what do they assess? Disabil Rehabil 1999; 21: 97-105.
5. de Haan R, Limburg M, Schuling J, Broeshart J, Jonkers L, van Zuylen P. Klinimetrische evaluatie van de Barthel Index; een meetinstrument voor beperkingen in activiteiten vn bet dagelijks leven. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 1993; 137: 917-21.
6. Schuling J, de Haan R, Limburg M, Groenier KH. The Frenchay activities Index; assessment of functional health status in stroke patients. Stroke 1993; 24: 1173-77.
7. van Straten A, de Haan RJ, Limburg M, Schuling J, Bossuyt PM, van den Bos GAM. A Stroke Adapted 30-item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke 1997; 28: 2155-61.
8. de Haan R, Limburg M, Bossuyt P, van der Meulen J, Aaronson N. The clinical meaning of Rankin 'handicap' grades. Stroke 1995; 26: 2027-30.
9. Dickerson AE. Should Choice Be a Component in Occupational Therapy Assessments? Occup Ther Health Care 1996; 10: 23-32.
10. Gibson W, Schkade JK. Occupational Adaptation Intervention with patients with cerebrovascular accident: a clinical study. Am J Occup Ther 1997; 51: 523-29.
11. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, third edition. 1998, Toronto: CAOT Publications ACE, 1998.
12. CAOT. Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice. Toronto: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, 1991.
13. Davis SE, Mulcahey MJ, Smith BT, Betz RR. Outcome of functional electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of a child with C-5 tetraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med 1999; 22: 107-13.
14. Bailey A, Starr L, Alderson M, Moreland J. A comparative evaluation of a fibromyalgia rehabilitation programme. Arthr Care Res 1999; 12: 336-40.
15. Law M, Russell D, Pollock N, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, King G. A comparison of intensive neurodevelopmental therapy plus casting and a regular occupational therapy programme for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39: 664-70.
16. Bodiam C. The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for the assessment of outcome on a neurorehabilitation unit. Br J Occup Ther 1999; 62: 123-26.
17. Carpenter L, Baker GA, Tyldesley B. The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome of a pain management programme. Can J Occup Ther 2001; 68: 16-22.
18. Gilbertson L, Langhorne P. Home-based occupational therapy: stroke patients'satisfaction with occupational performance and service provision. Br J Occup Ther 2000; 63: 464-68.
19. Trombly CA, Radomski MV, Davis ES. Achievement of self-identified goals by adults with traumatic brain injury: phase I. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 52: 810-18.
20. Chan CCH, Lee TMC. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Occup Ther Int 1997; 4: 229-47.
21. McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, Doubt L, Law M. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 2000; 67: 22-30.
22. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford Medical Publications, 1998.
23. Wressle E, Samuelsson K, Henriksson C. Responsiveness of the Swedish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scand J Occup Ther 1999; 6: 84-89.
24. Effing T, Dirx M, Sleegers E, van Meeteren N. De responsiviteit van de COPM, ARA en SODA voor veranderingen in handvaardigheid bij plastisch-chirurgische handpatiënten. Ned Tijdschr Ergother 1999; 27: 109-16.
25. Group TE. Euroqol: A new facility for the measurement of of health related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 19: 199-208.
26. Ottenbacher KJ, Cusick A. Goal attainment scaling as a method of clinical service evaluation. Am J Occup Ther 1990; 44: 519-25.